All Activity

Our countries are being run by people who would be denied parole.

Add to the above "defense minister" and Thaksins proxy puppet will be at the mercy of the shin clan, and do as he's told.

Find someone who has a bank account. The Cash Deposit <-> Exchange options all take heavy commissions (15%+). Check Binance P2P or Paxful. But if you have a non-o visa (I am not 100% sure if needed) you could check https://www.orbixtrade.com/ and open an account and deposit by going into the bank with cash + passport or use a Cash Deposit Machine, however I think the machines need to have some Thai ID card now, didn't try for a long time. And then buy USDT or BTC or whatever and open another exchange account with your US bank somewhere else. Result would be probably around 1% fees.

Buy another bottle and drink that. When you have emptied that second bottle all the above ideas will seem far more achievable!

Well done that Chinese couple.

I had a girlfriend at University and she ended up at the old Bailey it was a huge money case and fighting over the children

Sound like a big money divorce case.

Evidence is not Evidence until it is admitted in Court. One only has to look at the Georgia case where the Raffensperger 'find me 11K votes' phone call was the impetus for the whole investigation and indictment. Recording and transcript readily available. Tossed by Judge McAfee on an indictment wording technicality.

Just face it... Thais are inferior... right guys... in fact anyone who is not just like you is inferior... losers.

Thailand now under the control of someone on parole.... Thailand really has hit rock bottom.

A very good description. I was shocked at how primitive the theater was, but that's where the savings are. Five years ago I was told that it costs over a million dollars to set up a dental practice in Vancouver. That year a dentist told me that he pays $10,000 per month for imaging software (that wasn't working properly). You'll get none of that from Dr. Warin.

Dad is probably the only reason he got such a light sentence

police will need to interview the surrounding neighbors and the land office to find out who is wanting this concession the most. let's see some old fashioned detective work

Mother will get the chef to prepare something nice..

You are a very very sad sack... at what point do you stop blaming the victims and go after the nefarious abusers... it may well be a moral issue... but do not forget that it is a CRIME.

Eating many small meals was the norm for people living in high temperature, humid environments back when there was no refrigeration or electricity. Preparing too much food caused rot & wastage. Also helped regulate the carbs load to maximize energy needed for farming. Unfortunately, the habits of a mostly agrarian society didn't change with the introduction of refrigeration, sugar, packaged foods, and a more sedate lifestyle.

No, Sukhumvit is a long road...... South side between 3rd and Buakhao.

They have none..

The answer apparently, is never, it's too difficult and involves doing actual work rather than just talking about things.

Removed quickly to try to cover up all the other rotten apples.

The terrorist Iranian regime's unprecedented recent attack on Israel, which included 185 drones, 36 cruise missiles, and 110 surface-to-surface missiles, is an unambiguous casus belli—an act of war—under international law. Of course, Iranian proxies spread across the Middle East, such as Lebanon-based Hezbollah, Gaza-based Palestinian Islamic Jihad, and the Yemen-based Houthis, have committed countless previous acts of war against Israel. But last weekend was something different entirely: For the very first time since fanatical Islamists overthrew Shah Mohammad Reza Pahlavi and took power in 1979, Iran launched such attacks directly from its own soil. The regime's attack against the Jewish state, a tactical failure in which 99% of Iran's varying projectiles were successfully intercepted by the Israel Defense Forces and a U.S.-led multinational coalition, is highly revealing. No longer can anyone deny the Iranian regime's role as "head of the snake" of Middle East chaos; nor can anyone now deny the regime's genocidal intentions. It turns out that when they chant "Death to Israel" in the streets of Tehran, they really mean it. (They also chant "Death to America," incidentally.) The obvious question: How? How did we reach the point where Iran feels so emboldened, and so unafraid of any repercussions, that it lobs hundreds of offensive weapons from its own territory toward another sovereign nation—especially one so closely allied with the U.S. and interconnected with the broader Western order? The answer is just as clear as it is troubling: The Middle East "realignment" so doggedly pursued by President Joe Biden, and by former President Barack Obama before him, got us here. Under the Obama-Biden foreign policy doctrine, an Iran so emboldened that it feels free to wage offensive war against Israel in such brazen fashion is not a bug—it's a feature. Steeped in pseudo-academic theories such as postcolonialism and surrounded by left-wing ideologues who held America and Western civilization responsible for collective global sin, Obama sought to remake the Middle East map. On the one hand, he sought to hamstring the region's sole outpost of Western civilization, Israel, as well as America's traditional Sunni Arab allies such as Egypt, Saudi Arabia, and the United Arab Emirates. On the other hand, he bolstered those countries' natural foes: Iran, Qatar, and the political Islam of the Muslim Brotherhood. The apotheosis of the Obama-Biden Middle East "realignment" was the terrible Iran nuclear deal of 2015, laundered to a skeptical American people by failed novelist-turned-Obama White House apparatchik Ben Rhodes via a cynical, astroturfed "echo chamber" of a P.R. campaign. In 2016, Obama secretly delivered $400 million in wooden pallets of cash to the mullahs—on the same day the nuke deal went into effect. More recently, the Biden administration agreed to cough up a whopping $6 billion in return for five illegally detained U.S. citizens—just weeks before the Iran-sponsored Hamas pogrom of Oct. 7. And just last month, Biden approved a fresh $10 billion sanctions waiver for Iran. There are too many other examples to count. But it is all in service of the Obama-Biden doctrine: Punish America's allies in the Middle East and reward its enemies. Just as bad, the Iranian regime has also shown itself capable of infiltrating and co-opting America's corridors of power: Last September, Semafor scooped emails revealing an Iranian regime-supported intelligence operation seeking to influence high-ranking government offices, think tanks, and academic institutions in the U.S. The man at the center of it all? Robert Malley, Obama's lead negotiator for the 2015 nuke deal and Biden's now-suspended special envoy for Iran. Most recently, Iranian reporter Vahid Beheshti just revealed a stunning internal Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps document that inculpates the Iranian regime in helping to orchestrate America's day of anarchic, crippling, pro-Hamas "demonstrations" on Monday. The Trump administration, something of an interregnum between the two "realignment" presidencies, pursued the precise opposite policies: Punish America's enemies and reward its friends. That is what basic logic would dictate, and the results were historic: new peace deals forged between Israel and the UAE, Bahrain, and Morocco under the umbrella of the Abraham Accords. It turns out that the obvious thing is often also the best thing. The Hamas pogrom and the ensuing war in Gaza was the first real test for the Accords—and the Iran-containment coalition they represent. Crucially, none of the Arab signees have severed relations with Israel. Even more remarkably, Saudi Arabia—not part of the Accords—acknowledged on Monday that it assisted the U.S.-led coalition that foiled Iran's weekend attack. All of this is a tribute to the statesmanship of former President Donald Trump and Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, who shepherded the Accords across the finish line. And it is a glimmer of hope that more peace—and less Iran-emboldening Obama-Biden foolishness—might be just around the corner. 2024-04-20 Source

The US military has announced a groundbreaking milestone in aviation history: the first known test dogfight between an AI-controlled fighter jet and a human pilot. Conducted over Edwards Air Force Base in California, the aerial combat drill pitted two F-16 fighter jets against each other, one manned by a human pilot and the other operated by an AI algorithm. During the dogfight, which reached speeds of up to 1,200mph and saw the jets come within 600 meters of each other, the AI-controlled aircraft showcased its capabilities in real-world combat scenarios. The AI algorithm, embedded in a modified version of the F-16 known as the X-62A or VISTA (variable in-flight simulator test aircraft), relied on machine learning to analyze historical data and make decisions in the heat of battle. While AI agents had previously defeated human pilots in simulations, this test marked the first time the technology was put to the test in the air. Pilots were onboard the AI-controlled jet as a safety precaution but did not need to intervene during the dogfight, demonstrating the AI's ability to autonomously handle complex aerial maneuvers. DARPA, the US Department of Defense's research and development agency, hailed the test as a "transformational moment in aerospace history." Secretary of the Air Force Frank Kendall lauded the breakthrough accomplishment, emphasizing the potential for autonomous air-to-air combat to revolutionize combat aviation. Colonel James Valpiani, a commandant at the US Air Force test pilot school, highlighted the significance of machine learning in enhancing the safety and effectiveness of air combat. He emphasized the X-62A's role not only in advancing test capabilities but also in preparing the next generation of test leaders. The successful test underscores the growing role of AI in military operations and raises questions about the future of aerial combat. As technology continues to evolve, the integration of AI into military aircraft could fundamentally reshape the nature of warfare, offering new possibilities for efficiency and effectiveness while posing ethical and strategic challenges. 2024-04-20 Source

Don't see the correlation..... maybe a few less Indian tourists getting mowed down.

Such nonsense. You'd have us produce a tax guide that was full of blank pages, just because people like you disagreed that some points were implicit and not explicit. That's what the list of unknowns/unclear issues is for.

Amidst a pro-Palestine demonstration in London last Saturday, an unsettling incident unfolded as Gideon Falter, the head of the Campaign Against Antisemitism (CAA), was confronted by Metropolitan Police officers. The encounter, captured on video and shared widely on social media, revealed a troubling narrative of perceived discrimination against Falter solely based on his Jewish identity. In the footage, Falter, donning a traditional Jewish skull cap known as a kippah, was prevented from crossing a road near the demonstration in London's Aldwych area. Officers informed him that his presence, being "quite openly Jewish," could potentially lead to a "breach of peace" amidst the pro-Palestinian march. One officer went as far as to assert that Falter's mere existence was "antagonising" the demonstrators. This incident has reignited discussions surrounding the prevalence of antisemitism and the perceived vulnerability of Jewish individuals, particularly in contexts where tensions related to the Israeli-Palestinian conflict run high. Falter's experience sheds light on the complex dynamics at play during such demonstrations, where identities and allegiances intersect in volatile ways. In the aftermath of the encounter, Falter expressed dismay over the Metropolitan Police's handling of the situation, decrying what he perceived as "no-go zones for Jews" in London. Despite reassurances of safety, particularly during events like the pro-Palestine march, Falter's encounter with law enforcement cast doubt on the efficacy of such promises. The implication that Jewish individuals should avoid certain areas of the city to prevent potential confrontations raises profound concerns about inclusivity and equal treatment under the law. The Campaign Against Antisemitism issued a statement detailing the circumstances leading up to the incident, emphasizing that Falter and his companions were not engaging in any political activity or provocation. Instead, they were merely exercising their right to navigate public spaces as Jewish individuals, a right that was seemingly curtailed by the perceived risk of unrest. The incident occurred against the backdrop of heightened tensions surrounding the Israel-Hamas conflict, with pro-Palestinian demonstrators rallying in London to call for a ceasefire and condemn arms sales to Israel by the UK government. The juxtaposition of these protests with Falter's encounter highlights the complexities of navigating political discourse and identity-based tensions in public spaces. In response to the incident, the Metropolitan Police acknowledged the concerns raised by the video and reiterated their commitment to ensuring the safety of all individuals in the capital. However, questions linger regarding the underlying factors that led to Falter's treatment and the broader implications for freedom of movement and expression in diverse and contentious environments. As discussions continue surrounding the incident, it serves as a stark reminder of the ongoing challenges faced by minority communities, including Jewish individuals, in navigating public spaces amidst heightened political tensions and social unrest. Moving forward, there is a pressing need for greater awareness, dialogue, and proactive measures to address discrimination and ensure the protection of all individuals' rights and freedoms, regardless of their identity or affiliation. 2024-04-20 Source