Exsexyman
-
Posts
1677 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Downloads
Posts posted by Exsexyman
-
-
I'd say he's odds on to release a Country and Western Song in the next 6 weeks
This one would be favourite!
-
I suppose it must be a bit difficult to accuse another country of genocide when you are President of a country that was founded on genocide.
-
Missteps? HaHaHa. Hilarious. Does anyone remember when Lady Hillary "Misremembered" when she told her barefaced lie about landing under fire in Bosnia? Some things you might "Misremember", i doubt if landing under sniper fire would be one of them!! The woman is a pathological liar, as is her husband, she just can't help herself. I am not American but i have to say if the electorate there vote for this woman they deserve all the approbation that will be coming their way from the rest of the world a few months into her "reign"! Most of us are already resigned to the end of this experiment with non dynastic politics, time now for the American electorate to go back to voting for Clinton or Bush! Fast forward to to 2025, it will be a choice between Chelsea Clinton and Jenna Bush! No wonder the rest of us are having a good laugh! At least when an attempt was made to parachute Tony Blair's son into a safe Labour seat in Liverpool UK there was uproar and the plan was swiftly dropped. Democracy my Ar--e.
-
1
-
-
Although the U.S seems to get most of the blame for the deposing of Gadaffi I believe it was the French who were the prime movers. Gadaffi even warned that it was his regime that stopped an exodus of (sic) refugees from sailing to Europe. In so doing he protected Liberal democracies from their own Liberalism. If the European leaders complicit in the ouster of Gadaffi had even a shred of self awareness they should hang their heads in shame.
Although the US deliberately kept a low key role in NATO's toppling of Gaddafi, allowing the leaders of the UK, France and Italy to grab the 'Glory', the were undoubtedly calling the shots behind the scenes. They didn't spend $1 billion on the Libyan revolution for nothing. How quiet they all are now, all keeping their heads down,'Nothing to do with me guv'! What a contrast to those scenes in Tripoli with Cameron, Hague, Sarkozy and the Italian Foreign Minister standing on the back of a lorry, linked hands aloft, basking in their victory! And the Secretary Of State, Lady Clinton, with her evil cackling interview after the 70 year old Gaddafi had been raped to death with a rusty knife up the bottom. "We came, we saw, he died". A deathly silence now though, as the chickens have well and truly come home to roost. The impotent hand wringing as hundreds, soon to be thousands of refugees perish in the Mediterranean Sea. Today we hear that this is part of the ISIS strategy, they will send half a million more. The leaders of the West can't say they weren't warned though, many experts warned before they got involved in the Libyan conflict that this would be the likely result of the vacuum they would leave behind in Libya. Gaddafi himself was quite categoric in his warnings to NATO, "Europe will be invaded by thousands of immigrants if he is toppled from power". He was the only one stopping them. Remember he was the first world leader to warn against Al Qaeda, te first to call for the arrest of Bin Laden, long before 9-11. He also warned that Jihadists would subjugate Northern Africa inflicting widespread violence and terror if his regime fell. All of which has come to pass. Reading some of these articles from just a few years ago is chilling frankly. As you quite rightly say, our so called leaders should hang their heads in shame. But i won't be holding my breath. They clearly have no sense of shame in the first place!
http://www.express.co.uk/news/world/233238/Colonel-Gaddafi-Immigrants-will-invade-Europe
-
BangRon clearly hasn't seen Thai cigarettes before. How novel and exciting for him.
When he grows up in a few years he will be old enough to start smoking!
-
Becoming a fighter pilot is never "cushy". It takes a lot of work and is dangerous job. Any more silly, discredited talking points?
This comes lot closer and is actually on topic:
This is the main problem with Hillary, she just can't help herself. Whenever she sees a chance of "bigging herself up", or just getting herself out of a hole, her first instinct is to tell a whopping great big lie. No matter that it should be obvious that the lie will very quickly be exposed as such, she still does it. A massive character flaw which at the very least should raise serious questions as to whether somebody with this problem is a fit and proper person to hold the position she aspires to. When she is President and gets caught out doing it she will be crucified. My particular favourite "whopper", which i have posted before but is worth a second showing because is quite funny as a classic example of it not even crossing her mind that the lie will very quickly be exposed as such, rightly subjecting her to ridicule, which as President would surely demean the office.
When she went to New Zealand in her role as Secretary of State she gave a press conference during which, in an attempt to ingratiate herself with her hosts, she announced that she had been named after their most famous son, Sir Edmund Hillary the mountaineer who was the first person to climb Everest. To which Sir Edmund later responded, amid much laughter, "Why should this be? In 1947 when she was born i was an anonymous schoolmaster!" Anyone with an ounce of nous would have checked the dates first before making a fool of themselves with such a claim, but oh no, not our Hillary. As i said before she just can't help herself.
-
good publicity for the NRA
what is the saying again ? guns don't kill people ?
BULLETS DO
'Guns don't kill people. 3 year old boys do' Has a certain ring to it, perhaps the NRA will use it as their next slogan.
-
Me too.. i like it to be the redshirts.. but I don't see the connection, if these guys are involved then it is highly likely they are not redshirts and just "normal" terrorists. Scary then that they have started to bomb tourist area's
Me too.. i like it to be the redshirts.
What a sad man you are!!
If there is somoene sad its you.. personal attacks.. never any facts. Go play around.
My reasons for wanting it to be redshirts is easy.. if it is the insurgents the problems are far worse then when it are the redshirts. The redshirts might be bad but the insurgents are worse.. them extending to tourist area's would be a disaster. So it being redshirts would be preferable.
Oh dear, is that the best you can do? You made a comment, ie, you would LIKE it to have been the Red Shirts, which perfectly exposes your blind prejudices, then try to justify said comment with another silly one. 'Red Shirts are not as bad as Insurgents so Red Shirts would be preferable'! Preferable?!. When you are in a hole, stop digging!
-
1
-
-
- Popular Post
- Popular Post
Can you count to 67?
If so, post a list of the 67 US Senators who have publicly stated they will "keep this thing in check".
Will Senate Democrats really help kill an Obama nuclear deal with Iran?
March 30
"The negotiations over the future of Iran’s nuclear program are coming down to the wire, with last-minute snags developing around the question of whether Iran will agree to allow its atomic fuel to be shipped out of the country. Other unresolved issues include the pace at which sanctions would be lifted, how many centrifuges Iran could continue operating, what research and development would be allowed on more advanced centrifuges, and what monitoring would look like.
But even if the framework of a deal is reached in the short term — the immediate goal of the talks — there is a real possibility, the White House believes, that Congress could kill a final deal even before it is agreed upon, with the willing participation of Senate Democrats.Emphasis mine more - Washington Post/ReutersI realise this may be difficult for you Americans to understand, but this is an INTERNATIONAL agreement reached by some of the worlds biggest powers. Your congress can huff and puff until the cows come home but it can't 'kill anything. The rest of the world is sick and tired of the US constantly bombing other countries, destabilizing them, facilitating the takeover by ISIS in Iraq, Libya, and Syria next if they have their way. The vast majority of the civilized world will welcome this agreement with open arms, they want peace not conflict. But for the right wing in America, and indeed some on here, peace is not wanted, only the constant urging for more war. War means money, peace doesn't bring home the bacon. Of course Netanyahu's Israel will be spitting feathers over this agreement, and as we speak he will certainly be looking for ways to scuttle it, but thankfully Netanyahu is no longer welcome in polite society, never should have been but better late than never. Blessed are the peacemakers! And for the tiny minority who only want more and more wars, try not to choke on those sour grapes.
-
6
-
This is a fascinating thread. I've been wondering for a while now whether certain members, who have been unconcerned about the Junta, or have been outright supporters, would react to an obvious turn to a more autocratic situation in Thailand.
It turns out that invoking Article 44 is no big deal either.
And this is why:
- we are not affected personally
- nobody we talked to seems to be concerned
- the Shinawatras were very bad
- summary executions have not happened
- true democracies don't really exist
- things are so much better now, sort of
Now I feel so reassured. Don't you?
Some of those posters have been conspicuous by their absence today. They are being given fewer tools to work with however, in the wake of more widespread consternation of the current political situation: 'The EU, US, Australia, UN should keep out of it' argument is sounding increasingly hollow as the list of countries expressing concern grow..
Indeed.
http://www.theguardian.com/world/2015/apr/02/thailand-west-get-tough-prayuth-chan-ocha-junta-bangkok
-
Yoko Ono was not available for comment.... for a change.
You really should engage your brain and check before posting such utter nonsense. Yoko Ono has been paying tribute to Cynthia all day in numerous media outlets.
-
2
-
-
- Popular Post
- Popular Post
Whatever the outcome, I don't give that producer much chance of another producer job. The man that got Jeremy sacked and resulted in the Beeb losing millions of pounds, plus gaining much hatred from the viewing public is going to be notorious.
You really are in denial. Your hero got himself sacked by launching an unprovoked assault on a junior colleague. The producer is being backed by his employers and will do just fine. Sky have already said they will not be touching Clarkson with a barge pole, after the Andy Gray/ Richard Keys episode, they cannot afford to employ a known workplace bully, they would be crucified as soon as Clarkson went off on his next one. Also the advertisers would pull the rug as soon as Clarkson started one of his trademark attempts at humour by slagging off perfectly good products, coupled with his casual racism. Maybe we will see him on Channel 5 in a couple of years hosting a crappy chat show! But it really is quite sad to see grown men hero worshipping this bully, even to the extent of issuing death threats to a senior BBC person. Behaving like babies throwing a tantrum after having their favourite toy confiscated.
I Love the broom broom show and the bad Irishman make it go bye bye!
http://static1.holidayextras.com/images/family-travel/crying-baby.jpg
-
3
-
Is James May auditioning to be the next Dr Who? I think we should be told!
-
Well, Andreas Lubitz, this was an incredibly EVIL act.
If you wanted to die in a plane, why didn't you just use a small plane on your day off? Why did 149 other people have to die?
The thing that puzzles me about the suicide theory is that on a relatively short flight like this how could Lubitz have possibly known that the Captain would need to leave the cockpit to use the toilet. He can't have. So could this have been a spontaneous act, a moment of madness? Doesn't really seem likely. Whatever, a truly horrendous act if it was deliberate. The poor passengers, their last few minutes on earth just doesn't bear thinking about.
-
You might find that it was in his contract that he was entitled to a hot meal at the end of the day and it was the producers responsibilty to ensure that it should have been there.
I have not seen the contract so I cannot say for sure but it certainly would not be unusual neither would overnight accommodation when and if required.
He'd have got that hot meal had he not decided to go out drinking instead, and not return to the hotel until after the kitchen was closed.
Exactly. He had a table booked in the hotel restaurant for 8-30 PM, he decided to go on the p**s until 10-30, keeping a helicopter waiting on standby for this time which can't have been cheap, all at taxpayers expense, turned up more than 2 hours late for his reservation to find that unsurprisingly chef had gone home. Then launches into his 20 minute tirade at his junior colleague, including the immortal line, "i'll have your job for this, you will be sacked on Monday", followed by a 30 second physical assault on said junior colleague who was probably half his size, which required hospital treatment. And still somehow there are yobbo supporters of Clarkson who refuse to accept that he is anything other than a victim, and are sending death threats to the junior producer. To the best of my knowledge Clarkson has yet to condemn those issuing these threats. He is a nasty, spiteful bully who has rightfully received his comeuppance.
The hotel was some 70 odd miles from the filming location so they needed helicopter...
They kept the helicopter waiting two hours while in the pub, how much did that cost the BBC? was that the nearest hotel of acceptable standard? next time the BBC asks parliament for more money maybe time for our MP's looked at the BBC's extravagant spending in detail.
Ah so now it's the BBCs fault! I'm sure that was the only hotel of an acceptable standard to someone with Clarkson's sense of entitlement. The point is, the helicopter was kept waiting for 2 hours at taxpayers expense because Clarkson wanted to go drinking instead of honouring his table reservation. But of course this is the fault of the BBC! Anything to excuse Clarkson's yobbish behaviour eh!
-
1
-
-
- Popular Post
- Popular Post
You might find that it was in his contract that he was entitled to a hot meal at the end of the day and it was the producers responsibilty to ensure that it should have been there.
I have not seen the contract so I cannot say for sure but it certainly would not be unusual neither would overnight accommodation when and if required.
He'd have got that hot meal had he not decided to go out drinking instead, and not return to the hotel until after the kitchen was closed.
Exactly. He had a table booked in the hotel restaurant for 8-30 PM, he decided to go on the p**s until 10-30, keeping a helicopter waiting on standby for this time which can't have been cheap, all at taxpayers expense, turned up more than 2 hours late for his reservation to find that unsurprisingly chef had gone home. Then launches into his 20 minute tirade at his junior colleague, including the immortal line, "i'll have your job for this, you will be sacked on Monday", followed by a 30 second physical assault on said junior colleague who was probably half his size, which required hospital treatment. And still somehow there are yobbo supporters of Clarkson who refuse to accept that he is anything other than a victim, and are sending death threats to the junior producer. To the best of my knowledge Clarkson has yet to condemn those issuing these threats. He is a nasty, spiteful bully who has rightfully received his comeuppance.
-
6
-
- Popular Post
- Popular Post
I can't believe anyone would even defend him over this. Joking about stuff whilst 'in character' on a tv show is one thing, but tv shows are made by actual people in an actual workplace - you can't physically assault them and expect to get away with it.
Yes, amazing that there are so many morons around. A million of them signing a petition basically saying that Clarkson should be treated differently than lesser mortals because they like him on the telly, basically saying that he should have the freedom to verbally abuse and physically assault his junior colleagues. Many of these supporters actually issuing death threats against the victim! They should be traced and dealt with firmly.
The idea that Clarkson will now go to a commercial channel and be a roaring success with his same format is nonsense. Does anybody seriously believe that he would have got away with slagging off perfectly competent cars in the name of 'comedy', or his ongoing casual racism on a commercial channel? Advertisers would have pulled the rug from under his career years ago. The BBC is a public service broadcaster which doesn't have to tip their cap to outside commercial interests. The truth is Clarkson needed the BBC far more than they needed him. He will go the same way as Chris Moyles, Des Lynam, Jonathon Ross, even Morecambe and Wise, to name but a few who all thought the grass would be greener, but soon found out the reality was different.
To all you Clarkson fanboys, what level of offence do you think he should be fired for if not assault? How far would you let him go before you stopped hero worshipping him and seeing him as a great 'dude'. What line would he have to cross for you?
-
6
-
Saw he used a tank to run an almost million signature petition to the BBC.
Seems to me he is what he is, like him or tune out, not that something so simple is an option in a PC Nanny State.
So let me get this straight then, if a drunken colleague smacked you in the mouth in an unwarranted attack, you'd be happy just to ignore it if your employer just said "Oh let it go, he makes us lots of money"?
Sadly i suspect he probably would.
-
The alternative to DC is to dire to think about. At least the country is booming with unemployment low and very favorable taxes compared to the rest of Europe, where most countries are struggling badly
Anyone that wants Labor in after the last time is crazy, and to vote UKIP is just a waste they will barely win 3 seats, but give the keys to Downing street to Red Ed though the back door
Red Ed!! If you really believe that you must be somewhere to the right of Attila The Hun!
-
1
-
-
USA destabilized Libya and the whole region. The selfish reason was to keep those nations fighting interior and exterior forces while leaving USA alone. That worked. However, just like every other place the USA has touched (S. America, etc.) and destabilized, the actual ongoing results are a horror for the ordinary people, constant upset and fighting, and broken national economies. This is how USA has ruled for over sixty years, often with the addition of repressive strong-man leaders like Saddam and Noriega that USA inserts, props up, and then takes out. It is how USA has ruled Thailand, too.
Ask Libya people which situation they want........ now or ten yrs ago? And ten years ago they had Gaddafi but also stability and oil was steadily coming out to USA. Now a real mess there, but likely not sending any bombers to the USA for now.
NATO destabilized Libya,not the US in what was the biggest f..k up in that organizations history !!
It was no <deleted> up by NATO, the destabilization of Libya was deliberate. Before NATO's intervention Libya was a fully functioning, modern, secular nation, with absolutely no tolerance shown to Al Queda or any of the other Islamic jihadists. The first world leader to warn against Al Qaeda was Ghaddafi, he was also the first world leader to call for the arrest of Bin Laden, long before the events of 9-11. The problem Ghaddafi had was that he was planning to set up an African currency based on gold called the African Dinar to trade in oil, bypassing the US dollar. He also built a massive reservoir to supply fresh water to the country as well as many other infrastructure projects to benefit the people, at the cost of mind boggling amounts of money, all without any loans from any Western central banking system. So of course this could not be tolerated. He had to go. Now look at the place, total anarchy, various competing Islamic Jihadists overunning the country, reports this week that the ISIS fighters who launched the attack in Tunisia trained at Libyan training camps. The reservoir and the rest of the infrastructure destroyed by NATO bombings. A result as far as NATO are concerned, Libya now a dysfunctional state which was clearly the purpose of the exercise, after all, just about every expert on the region warned that this would be the result of the intervention so they can hardly wring their hands now and pretend that this outcome could not have been foreseen. Obama, Cameron and Hague, Sarkozy and of course Lady Hillary of Benghazi are responsible for this mess, and should be held accountable. But of course they never will, they will just move on to do it all over again somewhere else. The manner of Ghaddafi's death was appalling, a 70 year old man raped to death with a dagger up his behind. And this is the reaction of the US Secretary of State commenting on it. God help us all if this obvious psychopath becomes the 'Leader of the free world'.
-
2
-
-
- Popular Post
- Popular Post
Are most indivuduals in Gaza Islamic Jihadists?
They elected Islamic Jihadists to represent them. That is pretty much the same thing. They are responsible for their own mistakes.
Just as Israeli's have elected a vile racist and pathological liar who is recognized as such by the majority of the civilized world to represent them. Now they have to take responsibility for this as they increasingly achieve pariah status in the world community.
Time to break out the champagne, is it?
Don't be so childish. You really are showing your true colours, you are clearly implying that i am somehow anti-semitic. Nothing could be further from the truth. I will feel free to call Netanyahu for what he is, and if you choose to use your well worn and well past it's sell by date tactic of accusing any critic of Israel of anti semitism in order to deflect said criticism so be it. That card has been played too many times, it used to be the tactic of last resort, now it is the first card out of the deck. It is no longer effective, people can see it for what it is and are no longer intimidated by it. By your almost obsessive tactic of playing this card you besmirch the memories of the real victims of anti semitism, and probably smooth the path of true anti semites to ply their foul trade. Well done.
-
4
-
- Popular Post
- Popular Post
Are most indivuduals in Gaza Islamic Jihadists?
They elected Islamic Jihadists to represent them. That is pretty much the same thing. They are responsible for their own mistakes.
Just as Israeli's have elected a vile racist and pathological liar who is recognized as such by the majority of the civilized world to represent them. Now they have to take responsibility for this as they increasingly achieve pariah status in the world community.
-
8
-
- Whatever the rights and wrongs of this incident;
- whatever the merits or otherwise of Top Gear in it's present format;
- whatever the talents or lack of same of Clarkson
I would like to ask certain members a question.
You are constantly posting about how you find Top Gear boring rubbish and how you find Clarkson an oafish, thuggish boor.
Yet you are following and salivating over his every movement as though you were prepubescent girls and he a member of One Direction!
Why?
I occasionally watch Top Gear, usually for a few minutes only whilst channel surfing. I personally find it boring, the one called Hammond really gets on my wick, he is just like the school weed, desperately trying to seek Clarkson's approval. But that is just my opinion, plenty will disagree with me. What cannot be in dispute however is that Clarkson is an oafish thug, his actions in the hotel foyer in front of witnesses, including a family with children, must put this beyond doubt. Despite your obvious hero worship of the man, which quite frankly is a bit sad.
Presumably you come from the school of thought that says, "If a chap comes home after work having stopped off in the pub for a couple of hours, and the wife puts a cold meat salad down in front of him when he wanted a nice juicy steak, if a chap can't put her in her place by hurling abuse at her, calling her a useless f*****G c*** etc, followed up with a good smack in the mouth, without some do gooders accusing a chap of being a thuggish bully, whatever is the world coming to"?!
You would be in good company though, the British Prime Minister somehow sees Clarkson as some kind of victim in this sorry saga.
-
It would appear that the foul mouthed bully has been sacked. But of course like all bullies he refuses to accept that his behaviour may have contributed to the decision.
www.theguardian.com/media/2015/mar/20/jeremy-clarkson-foul-mouthed-rant-bbc-top-gear
-
1
-
Cheeky Carpark Attendant
in General Topics
Posted
It sounds to me as if the car park attendant was just making his idea of a cheeky joke. All this talk about "grooming" and the like is way over the top, the tabloid newspapers have a lot to answer for!
The OP should look on the bright side, at least it has given him the opportunity to let us all know that his kids go to a "Prestigious school", and that he spends four times as much on aircon and new tyres than the car park peasant earns in a year!