Jump to content

Neeranam

Advanced Member
  • Posts

    32555
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by Neeranam

  1. 20 minutes ago, MartinBangkok said:

    I'm running. Moving to another SE-Asian country first week of April. This after 15 years living in Thailand, spending approximately 2.1 million Baht a year (about 70% of my foreign income) in this country (multiple BMWs, Ducatis, Hondas, not to mention local girls, restaurants, nightlife, golf!)

    After the new tax rules were announced last year I have completely stopped spending money in this country. For golf I now only go to the local navy driving range and pay 20 Baht for a tray of 40 balls instead of thousands to pay courses where Thais get to play for a fraction of the price, not kidding, it's the hidden truth.

    There is zero chance I will ever pay the equivalent of 1 Baht tax to a country which gives me zero in return and where the only thing it gives me is a shocking amount of discrimination as a Farang. A month ago I was sent to Malaysia by my company for a 1 week assignment. What a wake up call. The people there (including government officials and police) so genuinly sincere and friendly. Another stratosphere compared to Thailand.

    Bye Thailand (I recommend those of you reading this carefully consider if Thailand is still worth it)

    Rather over the top. There must be other reasons you are not happy here.

    The course I play in Hua Hin only give 100 baht discount to me for being a Thai, hardly going to break the bank, 

    Btw, I was charged 5,000 baht more than my pal at Royal Melbourne Golf club for being a foreigner. 

  2. 15 hours ago, Mike Lister said:

    I don't think that is unearned income. But I do think that's tax evasion because the gift wasn't really a gift because she gave it back to you.

    It would make sense to give money from my UK income direct to my kids. No point sending to my bank then giving it to them here. Do you have any details about giving gifts to Thai citizens at university?

  3. 1 minute ago, WDSmart said:

    I just saw on CNN that the Israeli proposal is an exchange of 40 hostages for 700 prisoners, but there was no mention of a ceasefire or any other conditions. And it was reported that they didn't expect to receive a response from Hamas in a couple of days.

     as usual no parity

    • Like 1
    • Thumbs Up 1
  4. 22 minutes ago, WDSmart said:

    No, it's not "baiting at all. It's correcting your statements.

    For example, above, you say, "...if they were not there, then they would not be harmed..." Yes, and if the IDF were not there, they would not be harmed either. These Palestinians have a right to be there. Gaza is their home. The IDF has no right to be there except, in their mind, they have the right to engage in a revengeful invasion of Gaza, looking for anyone they consider to be Hamas to kill. 

    Well said, that's exactly the situation. 

    • Confused 1
    • Thumbs Up 1
  5. 5 hours ago, WDSmart said:

    Situation: The police are chasing a man who has just committed multiple homicides. He breaks into a house, gathers up a family (man, woman, and two kids), and barricades himself in a room with them. The police enter the house and break down the door to the room. The murderer is armed and is in a corner of the room holding the family, who are now bound, in front of him.

    Human shields should never be accepted as collateral damage or justified in the pursuit of military objectives. 

    • Agree 1
  6. 10 minutes ago, WDSmart said:

    My remark was in reference to your post blaming the killing of "human shields" on Hamas. The IDF is the group that is killing them. Hamas did put them there, but so did the Israelis allow the concert near the border with Gaza. I'm not blaming Israel for that, but if you use the same argument as you do about "human shields," you could.

    Good point. Not so much human shields but like flies, baiting Hamas. 

    • Thanks 1
    • Agree 1
  7. 2 hours ago, ozimoron said:

    Deputy Knesset speaker Nissim Vaturi from the ruling Likud party wrote on X, formerly known as Twitter, that Israelis had one common goal, “erasing the Gaza Strip from the face of the earth.”

    They are on course, thanks to the USA, who vote against ceasefire, provide the IDF with $billions and make the weapons that IDF use to reach their goal. 

    Not a good time to be an Israeli or Yank. Shame on you. 

    • Agree 2
  8. 7 minutes ago, Jingthing said:

    The priority for Israel now is war.

    This war that Hamas started.

    And the rest of the world is telling them to stop, including the US, who support them financially and give them bombs. Even the POTUS said they were bombing indiscriminately!! 

    This will not end well for Israel.  

    • Agree 1
  9. 1 minute ago, Jingthing said:

    Winning means being free of worrying  about further October 7 type attacks for many many years.

     

    Israel's long-term security depends on its ability to engage constructively with Palestine, uphold democratic values, and work towards a just and sustainable peace in the region. Sadly, they are not doing this and just care about getting the land, at any cost. 

    Do you condone Ethnic cleaning?

    • Like 1
    • Confused 1
    • Agree 1
  10. 4 minutes ago, Jingthing said:

    What would the UN do if they didn't have Israel to kick around anymore?

    What are you on about? Israel benefits from the UN - diplomatic support, peacekeeping, humanitarian assistance, and development cooperation.

    The UN address human rights abuses and violations of international law committed by Israeli, more than other countries as erm ..... you know why.

    • Confused 1
    • Agree 2
×
×
  • Create New...