Jump to content

Norlund

Member
  • Posts

    284
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Norlund

  1. I see it as pure desperation when someone claimes that public authorities in Thailand write something they don't mean on their websites and that you have to guess what they really mean. You also claim that lawyers, and especially an American lawyer with 30 years in Thailand and who has Thai citizenship, do not know what they are talking about. This must be the perfect "tool" to deny ALL THE FACTS in a discussion. Sorry this is just getting way too stupid.
  2. It is totally unnecessary because what the Immigration Office writes on its website is very simple and understandable. The problem may be that some people are unable to read it or perhaps have major problems accepting it because it does not fit into their view of the world.
  3. The reason why a Re Entry Permit came up in the discussion was that it proves that you have a VISA.
  4. Wrong. You change your VISA. Because technically the Immigration Office does not issue visas although with a TM87 you can apply for a Non Imm,igrant Visa because Immigration considers this also a conversion.
  5. Don't you know what a Re Entry Permit is? Maybe you should ask your friends the experts.
  6. Then you need to read what they write one more time.
  7. The "time frames" are NOT called "Permission To Stay". What you have is a VISA. That is why you can change your Tourist Visa to a Non Immigrant Visa at the Immigration Office. Every document you need in Thailand like a Thai drivers license, a Yellow Book, a Pink ID-card, a Thai bank account, Resident Permit, buy a car/motorbike in your own name and proof of residence from the Immigration Office is based on a Non Immigrant Visa. Why is this so difficult to understand?
  8. It is what I said. You arrive with a 60-days Tourist Visa. After 60 days you CHANGE the Tourist Visa to a Non Immigrant Visa. And then you Extend the Non immigrant Visa for 1 year more. "Permission To Stay" and "Extension Of Stay" do not exist.
  9. Iff you mean an extension of the 90-days Non Immigrant Visa I fully agree with you.
  10. When you enter Thailand on a Single Entry Visa you can leave the country as much as you please iff you have a Re Entry Permit Multiple Entry before the VISA expire. The TM86 is what the heading says. Change of VISA.
  11. Do you really believe that the Immigration Office writes "Change Of Visa" without meaning it? You should come up with something better than that.
  12. No they actually mean you have lost your visa and instead you have a "Permission To Stay".
  13. Absolutely no facts do you accept. But how about providing evidence for what you claim. The only thing you and "your friends" come up with is how ignorant and sloppy Thai officials are and that they mean something completely different than what they write online. Do you really believe that <deleted>? Iff someone is laughing it would be the people who reads that nonsense.
  14. The post "Kind of visa" is the VISA you have at the moment you apply for a Non Immigrant Visa. Frankly, it is a very poor argument that public offices and public officials are "sloppy" with the use of language just to fit their version of reality.
  15. This is a video I posted earlier in this thread, but I think some people don't fully understand the content. And in this video he explains what is the Difference Between a Thai Visa, Extension, and Permit to Stay? This is an American lawyer who has a Thai citizenship. There are videos of him that this forum itself has posted so his credibility should be something this forum accepts.
  16. This link comes from the Ministry Of Foreign Affairs in Thailand. And here there is proof that it is a VISA. But then again, these are probably also ignorant and lazy so when it says VISA, it should actually be "Permission To Stay". https://www.mfa.go.th/en/page/issuance-of-visa?menu=5e1ff6e057b01e001a03f7d3
  17. Be my guest please tell the Immigration Office the correct heading.
  18. Wrong. The VISA is the reason why you can stay in Thailand.
  19. I have proven that it is a VISA. It is only you who refuse to accept the facts by claiming that public officials are ignorant and lazy. Even the Immigration Office you refuse to believe. Where you have this nonsense with a "Permission To Stay" from could be interesting to know.
  20. When applying for a Resident Permit, one of the requirements is 3 consecutive years with a Non Immigrant Visa. But it is alleged that the Immigration Office and other public offices are so ignorant and lazy that it is actually 3 consecutive years with an "Extension Of Stay". "1. An applicant’s qualifications A foreign national may qualify to apply for a residence permit if he/she 1.1 holds a passport of his/her current nationality, which was granted a NON-IMMIGRANT VISA and has been permitted to stay in the Kingdom ofThailand on the basis of one year visa extension for the total of at least 3 consecutive years up to the application submission date." https://www.immigration.go.th/wp-content/uploads/2021/11/2.2คำแนะนำอังกฤษ-2565-legal.pdf
  21. So you mean that ALL government offices in Thailand don't know what they are doing? So ALL the evidence you refuse to accept on that basis?
  22. Do you think that Immigration Office is lazy too? https://www.immigration.go.th/en/?p=14714
  23. Then you know it has nothing to do with what we are discussing here.
×
×
  • Create New...