Jump to content

richard10365

Advanced Member
  • Posts

    2895
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by richard10365

  1. On 7/29/2018 at 11:44 AM, GinBoy2 said:

    This may not be the answer you want, but in general, in the real world most Thai degrees aren't worth the paper they are written on outside of Thailand....

     

    I disagree. Two of my classmates took their Thai degrees to graduate schools in foreign universities. One was the London School of Economics and the other went to Harvard University. While the degree was required, it wasn't the only thing universities want.

     

    That's true with employment as well. Most of my western classmates went back to their countries and are happily employed thanks to their degree. Some even joined the US military. Many employers look at the whole individual and what they would bring to the organization and not just a piece of paper. 

    The paper, from whatever country it comes from, gets you looked at. The rest is up to you.

    • Like 2
  2. I could probably make a lot of money talking about ASEAN.

    There was never any intention to open the borders and allow free movement of labor. Even the MRAs come with requirements that must be met prior to allowing labor mobility. The much touted freedom of movement was a political ploy to gain votes of either people who were against it or those who were for it. Either way, most people are unable to understand the various ASEAN rules because they are too complicated for the average person to understand. ASEAN is pretty much delivering everything it promised. It is impossible to understand every part of ASEAN because ASEAN is gigantic. Most everything that applies to every part of your life is likely part of an ASEAN agreement. Keep in mind too that the AEC is only one third of this massive machine known as ASEAN.

    Here is an idea of the monster known as ASEAN. Most of the agreements are pretty technical but if you have a question about any please feel free to send me a message and I will try to point you in the right direction.
    post-19457-0-78607900-1453975764_thumb.p

    • Like 1
  3. Payap does have issues that distract from the education. I'm sure I've burnt some bridges complaining about them; however, I've also seen improvement over time. Depending on how a person complains, they do listen. From my experience, insisting the university conform to my western ideas of education never worked well. Finding out why they do things and suggesting alternate ways of doing it has had better results. Everyone has different experiences at a university for whatever reason. My advice for foreigners choosing to study in Thailand is to be proactive and try to fill in the educational gap if you think the university is not giving you the quality education you think you deserve. There are plenty of 21st century solutions to supplement your Thai international education experience.

  4. One of my Pakistani classmates graduated from Payap University in Chiang Mai with a BA in International Business Management and just graduated with her masters degree from Harvard University in the United States. Her Thai degree didn't seem to be a disadvantage with getting into Harvard. Another classmate is at the London School of Economics. A Burmese MBA classmate is studying his PH.D. in Australia. He's doing ok too. Of course if you're a lazy student you will not learn anything and it doesn't matter where you study.

  5. According to the announcement..."The Ministry of Education is establishing a center to develop Thailand as the education hub of ASEAN. The center will coordinate ASEAN-related affairs and implement the association’s policies at the local level."

    If ASEAN sets the agenda and Thailand follows, then yes...they can do it. Historically, the Blueprints for the ASEAN Political Security Community, ASEAN Economic Community, and ASEAN Social Cultural Community have been followed and implemented by Thailand. If they apply the same level of commitment to this as they have the Blueprints, then I think they can do it.

  6. I paid about the same price for tuition at a Thai university and ended up with a bachelor's and master's degree. I still did 90 day reports and 1 year visas but I think that it's worth it. Whatever a person thinks gives their life value is how you should judge the Thai Elite Card. For me, education was important and I needed the education visa. For others, their free time to do what they want may be important so they get the Elite Card.

    • Like 2
  7. Business English is not an international program at Rajamangala University. It is a Thai program with low English standards getting into the program and low standards to graduate. If she really wants to speak English well she should study at Payap....but chances are she is studying at Rajamangala because she cannot pass the basic English requirements to enroll in the international college at Payap.

  8. I have mixed feelings...

    Sure it's worrying about the power that article 44 allows, but that same power also allows for all of the red tape and bureaucracy to be side stepped in order to make meaningful changes in months rather than years or decades...

    I look at many western countries and see that the road to 'meaningful democracy' was paved with Violent revolutions, civil wars, protests and uprisings.... And to be honest, if you asked me about a year ago, seemed this was the path that Thailand was heading as well.

    So while I do not look through any rose tinted glasses and while I do look at article 44 with some trepidation and fear as to how it could be abused...

    I also do have some amount of hope that it could allow for real changes in Thailand government and institutions that could greatly benefit Thai society and democracy in the long term.

    So it will all come down to how things play out and how it is used, but personally I am willing to wait and see before I make any final judgements.

    I hope the USA is not your example of meaningful democracy.

    • Like 1
  9. I did some research on GDP composition this year from the perspective that a country's GDP composition made up of agriculture, industry and services. I discovered most countries where the agriculture component to GDP is higher than 5%, that country will have very low GDP per capita. Thailands was 12% in 2012 according to the World Bank. The proposed agriculture plan sounds like a very bad idea.

  10. <script type='text/javascript'>window.mod_pagespeed_start = Number(new Date());</script>

    As always, Gen Prayut makes another unrestrained attack on the US in defense of his military-led government. His inelegant and bombastic condemnation of the US comes on the eve when a Thai delegation is going to the US to argue fair and balanced treatment on Thailand's listing with Tier 3 countries. This delegation was going to "help" the US understand that Thailand is meeting all its obligations in stopping and preventing human trafficking.

    "We told them Thailand is unlike others." Thailand doesn't need US democracy but it wants unrestrictive access to all US markets.

    So fine, the US is also unlike others, will also stand behind its democratic principles, and impose Tier 3 sanctions on Thailand because it DOES UNDERSTAND what Gen. Prayut stands for.

    Yet the USA is quite happy to support a coup in Egypt, quite happy to support the King of Saudi Arabia that "bastion of democracy" and several other countries including supporting the people opposed to the Syrian government, it supports the Israelis against the palestinians and yet you say that the USA will stand by its "democratic principles".

    How many countries has the USA invaded in the last 150 years quoting "democratic principles"?

    Add Singapore and Malaysia, both have elections but in reality they are a farce, and both countries nowhere near real democracy. Does the USA say anything? Never seen it.

    <script type='text/javascript'>window.mod_pagespeed_start = Number(new Date());</script>

    I agree with him. The US has the worst form of democracy where a government can be bought and paid for. It was the same in Thailand also so hope he changes it for the better.

    And while were at it, how come the US is / has been totally quite about 'democracy' in Singapore and Malaysia?

    Don't you get it. Singapore and Malaysia have elections; we don't. USA have always spoke strongly against Singapore and Malaysia about the need to improve public participation and freedom of expression. They particularly single out the harsh ISA and the Public Order Act. These strong condemnation has influenced the thinking of the locals and beginning to be manifested in election results. That's what needed, voters being informed and making decision at the ballot box.
    Malaysia ' s present system of government started with a coup in 1969 and they are doing ok.
×
×
  • Create New...