Jump to content

kingkenny

Advanced Member
  • Posts

    608
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by kingkenny

  1. 49 minutes ago, spidermike007 said:

    I have a quick question for my fellow posters. Has anyone on this forum ever met one of these so-called "Hi-So" people who have any redeeming qualities whatsoever? They seem like such a waste, they seem like they're so detached from the rest of society and so caught up in a high level of arrogance based on nothing but their wealth. Do they have any redeeming qualities, do they do anything for society, or do they just take up a lot of space and wander around with an over entitled sense of self? 

     

    I worked directly for 3rd generation for one of the wealthiest families here. one sister and 3 brothers. All are wonderful and caring, very generous and helpful.

  2. 18 minutes ago, newbee2022 said:

    Again the brakes...

    Fading brakes don't come overnight.

    It's the fading responsibility of owner/driver.

    Sad story again 🙏

     

    He doesn't actually say his vehicle had faulty brakes, he mentions a braking issue in the front vehicle, the car in front braked and he says this is the issue. his speed and weight meant he couldn't stop in time, not brake failure.

    • Like 2
  3. 6 hours ago, Gottfrid said:

    What are you trying to do? Of course I am well aware of the difference between meters and square meters. That was besides the point here. In this case, it is definitely as you say, too long time before you studied, and probably other factors starting to make you forget more easy.

    If not so, you can tell me how a chute they describe as 3 x 3 sqm, can look rectangular as in the picture. the 3 x 3 definition stands for that all sides are same long, which would describe a quadrant or a rhombus. If you can contest that, feel free to continue you arrogant posting of studies and such stuff.

    There is clearly an overhang on the right hand side, a ledge that makes the picture appear the opening of the chute is rectangular, however looking down the chute it is square.

  4. 15 hours ago, Yellowtail said:

    You have no idea how to get the boy back, so you dodge any questions by pretending you've already answered them, now you're pretending you'll answer if PMed. 

     

    How funny is that? 

     

    How stupid are you? Every question you have asked in answered by me in this thread, you are boring to the point of tedium.

     

    request for PM is to not answer your questions, it is to free others up from having to read your constant drivel on a subject you clearly have no understanding on, if you want answers to any of your questions read my posts, if your carer can't explain the answers to you then feel free to PM me.

    • Thumbs Up 1
    • Haha 1
  5. 2 hours ago, Yellowtail said:

    That's what I thought, dodging any questions by pretending you've answered them, and that you've grown tired of the discussion.

     

    You have no idea how to get the boy back. 

     

     

     

     

    Read through my friend, it is very clear how to get the boy back, now if you want to squabble send me a PM so people are not bored any longer by you, even my backside has fallen asleep.

    • Haha 1
  6. 16 minutes ago, Yellowtail said:

    When I suggested the father pick the boy up from school, you claimed: "Yes he can go to the school and collect his son, even take the divorce documents with him to show the school who has full legal custody, but would it solve the issue?"

     

    Now you are (apparently) claiming that solving the issue is unimportant, it's only the law that is important. 

     

    You've answered none of my questions, and you just repeat that because the father has custody: "...the child will be returned to the father and will be under his custody until he either gets married or reaches 20 years of age." yet you seem to have absolutely no idea how the child will be returned to the father, much less how the boy will "...remain under his custody until he either gets married or reaches 20 years of age."

     

    There is nothing stopping the boy from visiting his mother if he wants to. 

    As I said, you can bore a glass eye to sleep.

     

    to solve being repetitive and arguing with someone that clearly has nothing better to do other than arguing I will let you have what you will probably think is some victory. All my thoughts are in this thread and if anyone chooses to read them, followed by the tripe you have written they are free to do so.

  7. 1 hour ago, Yellowtail said:

    Yes

    No. I think it should happen, but I don't think it needs to happen. 

    If the father instructs who? While the mother is obligated to follow that law, she is not compelled to follow the father's instructions. Do we agree on this? 

    If law requires the mother drag the child out to the car and deliver them to the husband against the child's will any time the husband instructs her to do so, then yes, that is not how I understand the law. 

    How would you block her access in the future, if your boys were fifteen, and kept going to visit her on the way to school? 

    So how is the issue solved without any cooperation from the mother? 

    I do not doubt if the law requires the boy be dragged from the mother's home and returned to the father, the police will drag the boy from the mother's home and return him to the father. 

     

    But how would that solve the issue? 

    So, the plan is that after the cooling off period, the boy comes back and that's the end of it. 

    I never said it would solve the issue, I am focussed on what the law is and who has legal custody of the child in this instance, and if the father chooses to exercise his rights then yes, the child will be returned to the father and will be under his custody until he either gets married or reaches 20 years of age.

  8. 1 hour ago, BritManToo said:

    Splitting up siblings merely because you want a VISA doesn't seem like 'doing the correct thing' to me.

    Anyway, kid will be 15 next week, so nothing you can do, or any Thai authority will enforce, after that.

    You said this on page 1, I already countered that, please read below, this is factual:

     

    The child is subject to parental control of the parents until the child is legally determined to be an adult. Adulthood occurs when the child reaches the age of majority which is 20 years old in Thailand or when the child gets married. Until this time, parents have rights and obligations to their child.

    In this instance the father has legal custody of the child. 

  9. 5 minutes ago, BritManToo said:

    I've always avoided rocking the boat in foreign countries.

    You may think that's cowardly, but I always thought it was being sensible.

     

    I was always happy to look after and pay all expenses for kids living with me.

    But once out of my house they got nothing.

     

    Splitting up siblings just seems wrong to me.

    I'd find another way of getting a VISA or simply move to another country.

    I have read both your posts. I am not sure how doing the correct thing is rocking the boat. In 19 years I have had 2 dealings with the courts, both successful, both related to employees. It's the fear of doing the correct thing that allows the bad apples to function. 

×
×
  • Create New...