Peter Denis
-
Posts
6166 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Downloads
Posts posted by Peter Denis
-
-
- Popular Post
- Popular Post
18 minutes ago, covidiot said:The Exorcist ... ha ha.
-
1
-
4
-
- Popular Post
- Popular Post
49 minutes ago, WhiteBuffaloATM said:peter,really ? Zen vs two hundred years of western scientific method , right.....
any Zen (or whatever else is being smoked) induced “feelings” of euphoria or enlightment are long since proven as chemical brain reactions......as is love, marvellous as these emotions are are of course..... even the wonderful
“human spirit” is an evolutionary outcome.....
to Peter and others, I shall conclude “on topic” with this ;
ALL the scientific proof so far very strongly indicates No God so then the question “what are the odds?”must be asked, millions to one perhaps, same odds as the Flying Spaghetti Monster orbitting a distant star ? certainly in the realm of Narnia-like childish fantasy.....
“but you cannot disprove God” say the believers..... their ultimate weapon..
response being “that’s an impossible test ....and I dont have to “.........
Hi Unpigmented Tatanka
I posted this before but it remains highly relevant...
and it would also have cut short the last 3 pages of discussions on this thread, yes @robblok talking to you...
-
2
-
1
-
6 hours ago, WhiteBuffaloATM said:
anyone else been trolled by the pea- brained, charmless jerk “Peter Denis” ?
rudely dismisses my logic-based post as “ignorance”, “hate” & “excretement”, in a pathetic but amusing personal attack, no specific point rebuttal, all points dismissed as “already dealt with”; the normal recourse of charlatans and fools with no case / no debating skills.
comes over either as a religious zealot....or flat earther / conspiracy theorist perhaps......furiously & petulantly reacts to free speech, logic, facts & science......
Peter, if you have truly read the entire 394 pges of subject topic posts you badly need to get a life...
Hi Milky Bison,
My use of non-scientific 'shock' therapy to expose non-awareness as practiced by a.o. Gurdjieff and the Japanese Zen-masters seems to have worked. ????
Now go and read some of the great posts in this thread challenging your statement that only what can be indisputedly proved with scientific evidence is of real value....
Cheers - Peter
-
1
-
-
2 minutes ago, WhiteBuffaloATM said:
unlimited freedom of expression , with consequences.
so propose nonsense and expect ridicule, dismissal & lost reputation.
personal choice..........
people believe all kinds of nonsense; keep it private and dont impose it......
what can be indisputedly proved with scientific evidence is of real value....
people who can be, or purport to be, fooled & outwitted by superstition & childish stories are seldom really held in high regard........
even when making money from it........so called priests etc.
human morality is clearly genetic and therefore pre- dates religion.......
A truly amazing piece of ignorance you have written there, clearly you haven't read or absorbed anything from this long-running thread as all your pet-hates have been addressed and dealt with in depth on those pages.
Let me make use of my 'unlimited freedom of expression' to qualify your post as the biggest pile of White Buffalo excrement I have come across in ages... ????
-
1
-
-
2 minutes ago, rockyysdt said:
The Peter.
For risk of hijacking the thread (the issue of authenticity being relevant).
The Note 10 Lite has no waterproofing.
Is this an issue in Thailand?
Hi, I am not an expert on this (far from actually).
But when you buy a 'wallet' for your mobile phone (those wallets are incredibly cheap on Lazada, you would be able to get one for your Samsung for approx 100 THB) I guess your mobile phone will be well-protected , both against scratches on the screen as well as water-droplets when carrying it with you in your pocket when it rains.
Cheers!
-
37 minutes ago, rockyysdt said:
...
I'm currently viewing 2 x Samsung Galaxy Note 10 Lite phones both associated with Lazada LazMall.
One is advertised for 11,990 and the other featuring "Samsung Official Store" advertised for 15,488.
Both are 8/128 with 4,500 battery, the only difference is the less expensive model is black.
Judging by your and others comments, am I safe to buy the less expensive one, or is it possible it's a copy?
I'm out of the country but would ship to new owner who may not be able to determine authenticity.
...
The only thing I can advise is:
1 - take a good look at the specs for both models as advertised,
2 - when they are indeed identical (except that the cheaper one only comes in black color), do look at the warranty.
I suspect that you would get full x-years warranty when buying from the official Samsung store, and that might not be the case when buying from the other seller, but do check if you get any guarantee from the other seller.
Also you wrote that BOTH are on LazMall, which means you would buy an absolutely genuine Samsung product (the LazMall guarantee).
So if they are indeed identical in specifications, I would go for the one that is +20% cheaper even if it has no or reduced warranty. When buying a genuine product - as you would be doing - the chance of you having to make use of the warranty is very very small (and a brand like Samsung will probably also provide warranty on their genuine products even when not bought in their official store).
Cheers and success!
-
1
-
-
4 minutes ago, Inderpland said:
Thanks for that!
Did try again and got the below message again. Went through your list and think I fulfill all the necessary requirements to do it online but no luck.
Oh well, will head down to Jomtien IO closer to the due date. Question; when doing it in person how early can I go?
Sorry to hear that. So it seems you need to go do it in person to your local Imm Office in Jomtien.
That can be done from 14 days before due date till 6 days after due date.
Better not do it too early (and keep trying on-line) as the due date of your next 90-day report will be determined by adding 90 days to the date of submitting/approving your current one.
> Also when doing it in person, you can ask the Imm Officer for a print-out of their submission as it is possible that you are not able to do it on-line because of something as simple as 1 letter different in the approved earlier 90-day report from you that they keep (and which should be fully aligned with your TM-30 data which they should have, as the 90-day report is nothing more than a confirmation that your official address for immigration purposes as notified by that TM-30 has not changed).
-
1
-
-
19 hours ago, Inderpland said:
So, it didn't work, just told me to go to the immigration office. Anyone knows what the latest document requirements are in Jomtien IO?
I just tried and it worked for me.
https://extranet.immigration.go.th/fn90online/online/tm47/TM47Action.do
But unfortunately when the program displays an error-message it does not provide the reason, so attached an online 90-day reporting trouble-shooting guideline, addressing the most common issues why 'it is not working'.
Hope this helps.
-
For sake of clarity re your friend's extension options.
1 - A 60-day Tourist Visa (or a 45-day Visa Exempt entry) is only eligible for ONE 30-day extension
2 - After that one-time 30-day extension your friend will only have 2 options when wanting to further stay in Thailand:
a) Applying for a 60-day covid-19 extension, which can be extended as long as Thai Immigration keeps on issuing them (as long as the current border restrictions are in place, it is unlikely that Immgration will stop providing such covid-19 extensions)
b) When +50 years of age, your friend can also apply for a 90-day Non Imm O Visa for reason of 'retirement', which has to be done when having still at least 15 days left on her permission to stay (some IOs require 21 or 23 days). Subsequently, in the last month of those 90 days, she can then apply for a 1-year extension of stay which must be done at the same Imm Office that provided the initial 90-day Non Imm O Visa.
-
1
-
-
3 minutes ago, Tanoshi said:
I get no such message.
NEW THAI DRIVING LICENCE | กรมการขนส่งทางบก (dlt.go.th)
Indeed the DLT offices did close or restrict services last year, but re-opened within a couple of months.
I renewed my 5 year licence in March this year no problem.
Unless they have closed again since Songkran and the increase in Covid infections, I'm not aware.
Your better to ring your local DLT to get a definitive answer on licence applications/renewals at this current time,
That banner which I posted stating suspension of services is featured on the Home-page of the DLT website
It boggles the mind that the opening page of the main website of DLT features incorrect information , when you were obviously able to renew your 5-year licence 2 months ago...
But TIT, always good for a surprise...
-
Prominent on the Home-page of the DLT-website it is stated that
All Land Transport Offices have suspended
all services to driving license and transport personnel license
from March 31 st 2020
until the state of emergency is terminated or until there is any other announcement.
We are now almost 14 months later, so I wonder whether that is still correct, as I need to apply for a driving license in order to be in compliance with motorcycle-insurance.
= = = = =
The DLT website also contains the procedure to apply for a 2-year driving license.
That procedure is almost 5 years old, so also here I wonder whether the steps outlined are still valid.
Date 15 July 2559
IN CASE OF FOREIGNER TEMPORARY (TWO YEAR) DRIVING LICENSE
HAVE TO PREPARE THE DOCUMENTS AS FOLLOW
-
1
PASSPORT WITH VISA (ORIGINAL AND PHOTO COPY)
-
2
ORIGINAL PRESENT RESIDENT ADDRESS IN THAILAND CERTIFY FROM EMBASSY / IMMIGRATION BUREAU (VALID FOR 1 YEAR) OR WORK PERMIT (WITH PRESENT RESIDENT ADDRESS IDENTIFIED) AND ORIGINAL PHOTO COPY
-
3
ORIGINAL MEDICAL CERTIFICATE (5 DISEASES FORM) FROM CLINIC OR HOSPITAL (VALID FOR 1 MONTH)
-
4
ORIGINAL AND PHOTO COPY OF INVALID INTERNATIONAL DRIVING LICENCE (1949 CONVENTION) OR LOCAL DRIVING LICENCE (TRANSLATE IN TO ENGLISH OR THAI LANGUAGE AND CERTIFY BY EMBASSY IF IT IS N'T IN ENGLISH LANGUAGE)
PROCEDURE
IF YOU ARE DISQUALIFIED IN NO.4 - FULL STEP FOLLOWING-
1
CHECK THE DOCUMENTS
-
2
PRINT THE APPLICATION FORM
-
3
IF YOU ARE QUALIFIED IN NO.4 ->
- * TAKE A TRAINING 1 HOURS
- * TAKE A PHYSICAL TEST
- TAKE A TRAINING 5 HOURS
- TAKE A PHYSICAL TEST
- TAKE A THEORY TEST
- TAKE A PRACTICAL TEST
-
4
PAY THE FEE / TAKE A PHOTO AND PRINT DRIVING LICENCE (Fee 205 baht for car, Fee 105 baht for motorcycle)
-
1
-
On one of the Forum threads I came across this promotion on LAZADA
> https://www.lazada.co.th/products/10mbps-dtac-12-i1929192284-s6099702345.html
So I did order that 10 Mbps dTac SIM-card, which arrived 2-3 days later.
That SIM only costs 1.390 THB and provides unlimited 10 Mbps mobile data for a full year!
Not only that, but it also features unlimited free calls on the dTac network, and for 50 THB a month this can be extended to ALL Thai providers. As I live in South Isaan where dTac is the most widely used network, the latter is not necessary for me (but good to know that it is available).
I now use that new 10 Mbps SIM and I did a speed-test which indeed shows that I can surf and download - as well as upload - at 10 Mbps (our house is fairly close to a dTac send-pole which probably explains that max speed I get).
Note: 10Mbps means that you can download 1.25 Mb per second, or 75 MB a minute or 4.5 GB per hour. Whether you get those speeds is of course dependent on the server that provides the downloaded content, but on some servers I get 3 GB per hour.
Obviously that SIM-card is really a worthwhile deal, and surely when you need mobile data if you do not have WiFi or cable in your home.
The only thing you need to do once your SIM-card is delivered by Lazada, is to register it on your or your wife/girlfriends name at a dTac shop. The SIM-card features also an instruction on how to do that yourself, but as it was in Thai I simply went to the local dTac shop (in my local super-market) and they had it fixed for me in 3 minutes.
-
1
-
-
3 minutes ago, johnnybangkok said:
And the '(+10.000 suspected deaths reported)'?
It's there for everyone to see so there's no denying you stated this.
Below attached a detailed summary of the suspected deaths reported as of 08-05-2021 on the EudraVigilance website for the 4 covid-19 vaccines.
Simply count them and you will see > well over 10.000 suspected deaths reported.
And I would be interested to receive the evidence to ascertain your claim that "the vast, vast majority of the deaths would have occured anyway as of course many of the recipients where particularly old, frail and ill already."
= = =
Here is the summary data through May 8, 2021.
Total reactions for the experimental mRNA vaccine Tozinameran (code BNT162b2,Comirnaty) from BioNTech/ Pfizer: 5,368 deaths and 170,528 injuries to 08/05/2021
- 12,435 Blood and lymphatic system disorders incl. 54 deaths
- 8,551 Cardiac disorders incl. 636 deaths
- 62 Congenital, familial and genetic disorders incl. 4 deaths
- 4,828 Ear and labyrinth disorders incl. 3 deaths
- 153 Endocrine disorders
- 5,413 Eye disorders incl. 9 deaths
- 37,167 Gastrointestinal disorders incl. 270 deaths
- 115,627General disorders and administration site conditions incl. 1719 deaths
- 279 Hepatobiliary disorders incl. 24 deaths
- 4,047 Immune system disorders incl. 25 deaths
- 12,099 Infections and infestations incl. 589 deaths
- 4,142 Injury, poisoning and procedural complications incl. 72 deaths
- 8,904 Investigations incl. 196 deaths
- 2,961 Metabolism and nutrition disorders incl. 109 deaths
- 59,217 Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders incl. 58 deaths
- 194 Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps) incl. 11 deaths
- 73,4 Nervous system disorders incl. 535 deaths
- 231 Pregnancy, puerperium and perinatal conditions incl. 9 deaths
- 83 Product issues
- 7,002 Psychiatric disorders incl. 81 deaths
- 1,143 Renal and urinary disorders incl. 82 deaths
- 1,241 Reproductive system and breast disorders incl. 2 deaths
- 16,257 Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders incl. 619 deaths
- 18,516 Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders incl. 46 deaths
- 564 Social circumstances incl. 9 deaths
- 142 Surgical and medical procedures incl. 9 deaths
- 9,851 Vascular disorders incl. 197 deaths
Total reactions for the experimental mRNA vaccine mRNA-1273(CX-024414) from Moderna: 2,865 deaths and 22,985 injuries to 08/05/2021
- 1,047 Blood and lymphatic system disorders incl. 19 deaths
- 1,674 Cardiac disorders incl. 301 deaths
- 8 Congenital, familial and genetic disorders incl. 2 deaths
- 535 Ear and labyrinth disorders
- 29 Endocrine disorders incl. 1 death
- 793 Eye disorders incl. 4 deaths
- 4,952 Gastrointestinal disorders incl. 100 deaths
- 16,192 General disorders and administration site conditions incl. 1255 deaths
- 98 Hepatobiliary disorders incl. 6 deaths
- 587 Immune system disorders incl. 4 deaths
- 1,906 Infections and infestations incl. 151 deaths
- 1,042 Injury, poisoning and procedural complications incl. 53 deaths
- 1,395 Investigations incl. 68 deaths
- 670 Metabolism and nutrition disorders incl. 58 deaths
- 7,143 Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders incl. 58 deaths
- 60 Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps) incl. 11 deaths
- 9,617 Nervous system disorders incl. 294 deaths
- 62 Pregnancy, puerperium and perinatal conditions
- 11 Product issues
- 1,118 Psychiatric disorders incl. 45 deaths
- 383 Renal and urinary disorders incl. 32 deaths
- 135 Reproductive system and breast disorders incl. 1 death
- 2,822 Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders incl. 255 deaths
- 2,901 Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders incl. 22 deaths
- 214 Social circumstances incl. 9 deaths
- 131 Surgical and medical procedures incl. 16 deaths
- 1,526 Vascular disorders incl. 100 deaths
Total reactions for the experimental vaccine AZD1222/VAXZEVRIA (CHADOX1 NCOV-19) from Oxford/ AstraZeneca: 2,102 deaths and 208,873 injuries to 08/05/2021
- 6,221 Blood and lymphatic system disorders incl. 86 deaths
- 8,504 Cardiac disorders incl. 261 deaths
- 83 Congenital, familial and genetic disorders incl. 2 deaths
- 5,774 Ear and labyrinth disorders
- 174 Endocrine disorders incl. 2 deaths
- 9,158 Eye disorders incl. 7 deaths
- 62,739 Gastrointestinal disorders incl. 99 deaths
- 158,518General disorders and administration site conditions incl. 604 deaths
- 319 Hepatobiliary disorders incl. 18 deaths
- 2,135 Immune system disorders incl. 8 deaths
- 12,002 Infections and infestations incl. 138 deaths
- 4,991 Injury, poisoning and procedural complications incl. 33 deaths
- 11,441 Investigations incl. 38 deaths
- 7,621 Metabolism and nutrition disorders incl. 31 deaths
- 93,094 Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders incl. 24 deaths
- 178 Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps) incl. 5 deaths
- 125,892Nervous system disorders incl. 318 deaths
- 128 Pregnancy, puerperium and perinatal conditions incl. 1 death
- 64 Product issues
- 10,895 Psychiatric disorders incl. 17 deaths
- 1,976 Renal and urinary disorders incl. 20 deaths
- 2,519 Reproductive system and breast disorders
- 18,411 Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders incl. 228 deaths
- 26,202 Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders incl. 13 deaths
- 475 Social circumstances incl. 4 deaths
- 431 Surgical and medical procedures incl. 14 deaths
- 10,653 Vascular disorders incl. 131 deaths
Total reactions for the experimental COVID-19 vaccine JANSSEN (AD26.COV2.S) from Johnson & Johnson: 235 deaths and 2,873 injuries to 08/05/2021
- 79 Blood and lymphatic system disorders incl. 7 deaths
- 169 Cardiac disorders incl. 22 deaths
- 3 Congenital, familial and genetic disorders
- 45 Ear and labyrinth disorders
- 3 Endocrine disorders incl. 1 death
- 110 Eye disorders incl. 1 death
- 783 Gastrointestinal disorders incl. 6 deaths
- 2,071 General disorders and administration site conditions incl. 67 deaths
- 20 Hepatobiliary disorders incl. 1 death
- 35 Immune system disorders
- 140 Infections and infestations incl. 6 deaths
- 117 Injury, poisoning and procedural complications incl. 2 deaths
- 507 Investigations incl. 11 deaths
- 56 Metabolism and nutrition disorders incl. 6 deaths
- 1,348 Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders incl. 9 deaths
- 4 Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)
- 1,852 Nervous system disorders incl. 32 deaths
- 5 Pregnancy, puerperium and perinatal conditions
- 4 Product issues
- 116 Psychiatric disorders incl. 2 deaths
- 35 Renal and urinary disorders incl. 3 deaths
- 29 Reproductive system and breast disorders
- 366 Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders incl. 18 deaths
- 172 Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders incl. 1 death
- 20 Social circumstances incl. 1 death
- 80 Surgical and medical procedures incl. 10 deaths
- 502 Vascular disorders incl. 29 deaths
-
1
-
1
-
17 minutes ago, johnnybangkok said:
Firstly, I cannot find a single link talking about 10,000 deaths. The best I could find would be in the region of 4,000 'suspected' deaths but even that's not verified. From the same artcile I quoted:-
' A post claimed that in Europe "3,964 people have died from adverse drug reactions for COVID-19 ‘vaccines’ – 162,610 injuries."
That’s a misrepresentation of information in an European database that tracks suspected reactions to medicines, including COVID-19 vaccines. The agency behind the database cautions that the information is only of suspected side effects, and that it should not be interpreted as meaning that the medicine caused the effects or that it’s unsafe'.
A detailed evaluation and scientific assessment of all available data is needed before drawing conclusions, the agency said. The COVID-19 vaccines have been administered to millions of people across Europe and the United States, and health agencies have vouched for their safety and effectiveness. We found no definitive proof that a COVID-19 vaccine caused someone’s death'.
Secondly, the site this originally came from was called The Gateway Pundit. From the same article:-
'The Gateway Pundit claimed two of the vaccines being used in the United States are behind thousands of deaths and injuries in Europe. The Gateway Pundit cites information from Global Research, a Canadian website run by the Centre for Research on Globalization, which was accused by NATO of posting conspiracy theories, spreading Russian disinformation and undermining Western media.'
Lastly, it's not only medical professional reporting this data. Anyone can go on the site and report reactions, syptoms or even deaths, which again you conveniently fail to mention and whilst vaccinations are highly effective they don't fully prevent Covid infection, with places such as the U.S. having reported cases of COVID-19 infection and deaths among fully vaccinated people still happening. There are also the many variants to contend with.
And you can stop your pearl clutching and attempts at faux indignation when I accuse you of misrepresenting the data because that's exactly what you did in your original post. You clearly stated 'That's more than 430.000 reports since the roll-out of the covid-19 vaccines, with symptoms ranging from 'mild rash' to 'death within days of getting the vaccine' (+10.000 suspected deaths reported).
This is blatantly false and since I have seen your posts before and I know you are an ardent ant-vaxxer (please confirm or deny this so people on this thread can understand your agenda), if you don't want to be called out for purposely misrepresenting data, then may I suggest you don't do it. There are FB groups and QAnon sites that cater specifically for these things.
Not biting...
and I stand for every fact that I wrote in my posts and am not taking back anything of it.
Why should I? I simply quoted easily verifiable FACTS (+430.000 reports as of 2 days ago) from the official EudraVigilance site, and it is not me but you that are quoting an outdated article which misrepresented these facts.
-
1
-
-
20 minutes ago, johnnybangkok said:
...
Your original statement was '+10.000 suspected deaths reported', with no explanation or context for this number, leaving any layman to think this is due to the vacine when it most certainly isn't.
...
Your statement is utterly ridiculous!
Why would a medical professional report a 'suspected death due to covid-19 vaccination' on the EudraVigilance site when 'it most certainly isn't'.
The reporting is done as an 'early warning signal' to get an insight in the number and nature of suspected adverse cases. When it is fully clear that the cause was NOT due to the vaccine, there is no point in reporting it.
And of course there will be reported cases of adverse reactions (and even death) that were not due to the vaccine. Hence the use of the term 'suspected'. Individual stand-alone cases will not trigger the warning signal, but when significant numbers of similar cases are reported an investigation is warranted.
You should be grateful that such a monitoring system is in place, and not accuse those that are looking at the data in that system of being dishonest when sharing relevant info about it.
-
27 minutes ago, johnnybangkok said:
You are being completely disingenuos with this post and you know it.
As much as there has been 'more than 430.000 reports' regarding this database, it is literally out of something in the region of 30 million reports and includes ALL adverse effects from a sore arm and rashes (as you correctly state) to deaths. But what you fail to state with your dramatic '(+10.000 suspected deaths reported)' in typical anti-vaxer 'I'll choose the numbers that suit my purpose' fashion is that the vast, vast majority of the deaths would have occured anyway as of course many of the recipients where particularly old, frail and ill already. Correlation does not mean causation and your spurios attempts to make it sound like there has been 10,000 deaths just from taking the vacine is deceptive and downright dishonest. There are many, many reports to prove this so lets just start with some good ol' fact checking and a quote of 'Taking the raw data of possible COVID-19 vaccination reactions at face value and using them without context is an oft-used tactic by people attempting to undermine public confidence in the vaccines, according to the New York Times. They frequently interpret the numbers from EudraVigilance or from its United States counterpart, the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System, as evidence of the vaccines’ dangers.I do not understand why people like yourself are being quite so dishonest in this fashion when there are lives at stake. Do you feel no responsibility for your fellow man? Do you not feel guilt about spreading false and misleading information or masking your anti-vaxer pseudoscience under information that people can trust to tell the opposite story?
You should be ashamed of yourself but I'm sure your echo chamber doesn't allow self-reflection.
An emotional, aggressive, name-calling and non-factual reaction from your part.
I challenge you to point out any false, misleading fact in my post.
FACT > There are at this moment 430.000 suspected covid-19 adverse reaction reports in the EudraVigilance database.
Since anybody can report an adverse drug reaction the data collected are only 'suspected' drug reaction reports, which I pointed out clearly.
It is also fair to point out that these reports will in majority address reactions that are not considered 'normal reactions to the vaccine' since most of them are posted by medical professionals (the reports actually provide that info - look it up).
And talking about dishonesty... how can you ascertain that "the vast, vast majority of the deaths would have occured anyway as of course many of the recipients where particularly old, frail and ill already."
Please note that I am NOT stating that these +10.000 deaths are due to the vaccine, but what's the point of the EU maintaining an official database, if one is not allowed to mention the official data of suspected adverse covid-19 vaccine reactions which it contains.
I am surely not 'ashamed of myself' for presenting facts based on actual and official data, which are - unfortunately - not so easily accessible and should not be sweeped under the table but warrant some serious scrutiny.
-
1
-
-
7 hours ago, shy coconut said:
Are these headline numbers purely deaths as a direct consequence of the vaccine
and if so is that one particular variety of a general result of all the vaccines?
Are these deaths and illnesses a result of covid 19 or does it include the multitude
of child vaccinations plus the TB prevelant in Asia?
Please don't ask me to read the link as I really don't understand a lot of the technical
language used (I'm more than happy to admit my ignorance) and detect a slight
whiff of flat earthers in the organisation that published the report.
The post you referred to contained links to EudraVigilance - the European database of suspected adverse drug reaction reports.That 2012 initiative allows health professionals and the public to report on any adverse drug reactions they came across.Since anybody can report an adverse drug reactions the data collected are only 'suspected' drug reaction reports. But the value of collecting these reports and making them accessible lies in the 'power of numbers' which transcends anecdotal individual reports.You can access the reports on the 4 covid-19 vaccines used in the EU.To consult the reports for COVID-19 vaccines, follow the link above, click on the letter 'C' and scroll down until “COVID-19”.Up to 15/05/2021 the number of individual cases identified in EudraVigilance for- COVID-19 MRNA VACCINE PFIZER-BIONTECH (TOZINAMERAN) is 179,658- COVID-19 MRNA VACCINE MODERNA (CX-024414) is 25,849- COVID-19 VACCINE ASTRAZENECA (CHADOX1 NCOV-19) is 222,071- COVID-19 VACCINE JANSSEN (AD26.COV2.S) is 4,162That's more than 430.000 reports since the roll-out of the covid-19 vaccines, with symptoms ranging from 'mild rash' to 'death within days of getting the vaccine' (+10.000 suspected deaths reported).-
1
-
-
- Popular Post
- Popular Post
1 hour ago, Andrew Dwyer said:I remember the good old days when this weekly topic was all about things that had happened in the past week interspersed with a reasonable amount of British humour and tales of scrabble and teaching at International schools.
Lately it seems to be a platform for one man’s opinions , those opinions can be aired on any of the numerous vaccine threads clogging up this forum. No need to turn what was a good Sunday read with a cuppa into a thread to raise the blood pressure, even more , of the TVF populate.
In these troublesome times we need your humour Rooster not your stance on current affairs . !!
Great post Andy and 100% spot-on!
Couldn't agree more.
> Rooster Robin being corrected by Andy the Batman in covid-times...
-
1
-
5
-
1 hour ago, Tanoshi said:
As one of the Insurance guru's of this forum, I sent you a link to download the PDF's pertaining to this particular Travel Insurance policy, which is not specific.
I certainly don't think this type of policy would be suitable for any Visa application in it's current form for entry to Thailand, which is quite specific on the requirements.
Appreciate your comments when you've had time to view the PDF's.
To meet the Thai Embassy requirement re 400K/40K health-insurance when applying for a Non Imm O-A Visa (currently also required when applying for a Non Imm O Visa for reason of retirement), applicants can make use of both foreign and Thai insurance policies to comply.
However, when opting for foreign insurance (often because you are already having such policy) you would need to have your insurer fill in and sign the Foreign Insurance Certificate, where they state that your insurance meets both the 400K in-patient and 40K out-patient coverage. The problem is of course having to convince your insurer to sign that document which refers to Thai legislation which they are not familiar with, and hence they will be reluctant to do so.
But when the foreign insurer is willing to fill in and sign that FIC, the applicant will meet the 400K/40K health-insurance requirement.
And indeed it would be best if the policy should cover the 12-month period a Non Imm O-A Visa entry could provide you on entry, but that is NOT required. And this for the simple reason that the policy expiry date will be mentioned by the Thai Embassy in a note on the Non Imm O-A Visa you will be provided. And when entering Thailand you would be stamped in for whichever is shorter:
- the 12 months a Non Imm O-A Visa entitles you to
OR
- till the expiry date of that health-insurance policy mentioned in the note on your passport.
This allows people that already have a health-insurance policy that meets the 400K/40K requirements to make use of their policy, even if it expires earlier.
But the consequence then is that those on a Non Imm O-A Visa of which the permission to stay was capped till expiry date of their foreign policy, would then have to apply for the 1-year extension of stay based on that original Non Imm O-A Visa for reason of retirement earlier than the normal 12 months. And doing so they will also have to subscribe at that earlier date to a THAI health-insurance policy. Hence my earlier comment that it is only in very specific cases that it would be advantageous to make use of a foreign policy that expires e.g. after 6 months.
Hope this clarifies the matter.
-
1
-
-
36 minutes ago, placeholder said:
Can you provide a link to that report?
45 minutes ago, Tanoshi said:There have been a lot of 'severe' reactions reported in Thai news outlets.
The 7 nurses at the training University who experienced 'stroke' like symptoms and were immediately transferred to a hospital, one of whom died days later.
...
Link to the article re the 9 student-nurses that experienced severe side-effects after receiving the vaccine.
https://thethaiger.com/coronavirus/9-student-nurses-experience-side-effects-from-sinovac-vaccine
The article is from 7 days ago and I did not yet come across an update.
If one of them died that would surely be reported on Thai media... -
27 minutes ago, DBath said:
...
That said, the ‘green pass’ suits me fine, with the added benefit of being able to avoid people like you and others here who want to try and dictate how I should live my life, simply because of those who are too stupid to responsibly do so. I’m healthy, happy, I always wear a mask and diligently wash and use hand gel every time I go out - and when I return. I avoid getting near or touching other people. I have everything I need and I certainly don’t need some stupid, crazy government law or any other person dictating how I should live my life.
Anyone here care to provide me statistics on what my risk percentages are for getting or passing covid to others? I’d sure be interested to know, as I haven’t seen anything intelligently written about that.
Regardless, it’s probably not going to change my opinion one iota.
Filed this post under:
> Life of the Party requests statistics to ignore...
-
1
-
-
- Popular Post
- Popular Post
... and The Expert Birdwatcher's Sister
-
1
-
4
-
The Expert Birdwatcher
-
2
-
-
25 minutes ago, Seeall said:
Too much talk when only the first year is needed to show where the funds came from, after that where ever.... dont make ity sound so complicated and mysterius man..
Nothing mysterious, it's just that you clearly did not understand the actual issue - lol.
The OP's mother's permission to stay did expire and on her return to Thailand she will re-apply for a NEW 90-day Non Imm O Visa. Since she did not liquidate the Fixed Deposit Account with +800K she had for 8 years already, providing proof of that might be accepted by Immigration when she applies for that new 90-day Non Imm O Visa. However, a - by the letter of the book - Imm Officer might refuse that for lack of evidence that those +800K originated from abroad, as the funds were transferred 8 years ago.
Word Association (2021)
in ASEAN NOW Community Pub
Posted
Cat-killer