LosLobo

Deleted

Perhaps you need to consider the reasons behind the dismissal of U.S. Attorney for the Southern District of New York, Geoffrey Berman, by Barr and later Trump, during the investigation of Individual No.1 after Cohen's 2019 arrest for campaign finance violations.

As they say the 'rotten apple doesn't fall far from the tree'. Donald's ancestry appears to have shaped the man he is today. The family patriarch and grandfather, Friedrich Drumpf, was expelled from his native Germany for failing to complete mandatory military service. He later moved to the United States, where he ultimately became the owner of a brothel. Historian finds German decree banishing Trump's grandfather | Donald Trump | The Guardian

Before the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA) was signed under the Obama administration, Iran’s breakout time – or the time it would have taken for Iran to gather enough fissile material to build a weapon – was only two to three months. The JCPOA was designed to increase Iran’s breakout time to one year or more. This was achieved by requiring Iran to reduce its stockpile of uranium by 98%, and keep its level of uranium enrichment at 3.67% — significantly below the enrichment level needed to create a bomb. As of now, the situation has changed. Iran’s nuclear program has been advancing. According to estimates from February 2024, Iran can now make weapons-grade uranium (WGU) for seven nuclear weapons in one month. This is a significant reduction in breakout time compared to the period immediately after the JCPOA was implemented. However, it’s important to note that Iran has not made the political decision to produce nuclear weapons, according to Western and Israeli intelligence. The Historic Deal that Will Prevent Iran from Acquiring a Nuclear Weapon | The White House (archives.gov) Iran nuclear deal: What it all means - BBC News What to Know About Iran’s Nuclear Program: Breakout Time (fdd.org) An Israeli attack on Iran’s nuclear weapons programme is unlikely – here’s why (theconversation.com)

'All legal'. Trump LLC was found guilty of tax fraud are you suggesting Trump's personal taxes would be any different? Jury Finds Trump Organization Guilty of Tax Fraud Scheme – NBC New York

Seems Trump may have violated the gag order......

This must go down as the excuse of the century along with 'the dog ate my homework'. 'Alina Habba has unlikely excuse for Trump falling asleep in court: ‘He reads a lot’ Alina Habba has unlikely excuse for Trump falling asleep in court

Donald Trump aka Dozo the Clown, the presumptive Republican National Committee (RNC) nominee for the 2024 leader of the free world. https://x.com/MeidasTouch/status/1780364225636118823 And ground hog day again on Day Two. Trump Fell Asleep AGAIN at Day Two of His Trial

Do you think that voters should have had all the information about the candidates, including any potential scandals, in order to make an informed decision during the 2016 election? Have you come across any news or reports about other jurisdictions where Trump's actions following the 2020 election necessitated indictments involving election interference? How so? Finally, will you accept the court's decision is this case?

Have you ever considered using logic and reasoning in your posts? Your statement using the logical fallacy 'Absence of Evidence' would suggest otherwise. Just because there hasn’t been a conviction yet, doesn’t mean the charges are invalid or untrue. Legal proceedings can take time and a lack of conviction doesn’t equate to innocence.

'Difficult to do both'. Logic would suggest otherwise. The statement presents a false dilemma and a dichotomy either/or fallacy. It suggests that the only two possibilities are that he was either dozing or paying close attention at the same time, when in reality, there could be a range of behaviors in between these two extremes over the four hours that he was in court.

If Sleepy Joe Don can fall asleep at the most important of his 4,000 odd court cases, how will he fair if he has to enter the codes....

The problem is that Trump allegedly interfered and attempted to influence the outcome of the elections in 2016, which could be seen as an attempt to deceive the American electorate in their decision-making process. Two of Trump's other criminal cases are about the 2020 election and likewise are alleged election interference. Similarly Russian collusion, and both impeachments, more election interference. Seems Trump doesn't give two hoots about letting the American people decide.

Now you're calling a quotation from the article you posted, supposedly supporting your beliefs, bull<delete>, is this representative of everything you post?

The summary in the second-to-last paragraph of your article struck a chord with me: "Trying Trump is good and necessary, as are all the other steps that have been taken to safeguard democracy since his ascent to power." This reinforces my deep-seated beliefs about the legitimacy of the 91 indictments against Trump, as well as the investigations into his election interference, such as The Mueller Investigation, the coercion of Ukraine that led to his impeachment, and the subsequent impeachment for insurrection. It seems that this conclusion may not coincide with, and might even contradict, your viewpoint which implies that all your efforts to state otherwise may have been futile.