Jump to content

Crazy Alex

Advanced Member
  • Posts

    2,757
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by Crazy Alex

  1. 7 minutes ago, Morch said:

     

     

    No problems here. But since you're having difficulties following your own posts (or pretending to), here they are again

     

     

     

     

     

    Not too complicated, really.

     

    7 minutes ago, Morch said:

     

     

    No problems here. But since you're having difficulties following your own posts (or pretending to), here they are again

     

     

     

     

     

    Not too complicated, really.

    Well, that settles.... nothing.

  2. 13 hours ago, Matzzon said:

    I advice you to scale it down and take a look at the statistics of mass shootings in the US. Tell me you have the same statistics now?! No, you can´t, and we all know where you were going with your post above.

    Yes, he was likely going to the statistics on murder. While only 13% of the US population is black, roughly 47% of murders are committed by black people.

     

    https://ucr.fbi.gov/crime-in-the-u.s/2018/crime-in-the-u.s.-2018/tables/expanded-homicide-data-table-6.xls

     

    Ergo, if blacks would just tone down murdering to the per capita rate of white people, the murder rate in the US would drop by over 30%.

     

    Basic statistics. Now, if only Black Lives Matter actually thought black lives matter.

    • Like 1
  3. 4 hours ago, johnpetersen said:

    Not just that. No one has a clear idea of where he stands on the issues. So he can be whatever you want him to be. A Rorschach candidate. 

    Indeed. And look how well Obama played that card. I remember him using standard lines like making government "the way it should be". Who doesn't want government "the way it should be"? But obviously, that means many different things to many different people.

    • Like 2
    • Confused 1
  4. 5 hours ago, johnpetersen said:

    Here is an excerpt from and a  link to an excellent article from nature.com.

    Nature is one of the world preeminent publishers of scientific research

     

    The World Health Organization says the evidence is not compelling, but scientists warn that gathering sufficient data could take years and cost lives.

    "When public health officials say there isn't sufficient evidence to say that SARS-CoV-2 is airborne, they specifically mean transported in virus-laden aerosols smaller than 5 micrometres in diameter. Compared with droplets, which are heftier and thought to travel only short distances after someone coughs or sneezes before falling to the floor or onto other surfaces, aerosols can linger in the air for longer and travel further...

    And if SARS-CoV-2 is transmitting in aerosols, it is possible that virus particles can build up over time in enclosed spaces or be transmitted over greater distances."

    https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-020-00974-w

     

    Yes, most of us figured the evidence, if any, was weak. Thanks for confirming we were right.

    • Sad 2
  5. 9 hours ago, heybruce said:

    So you've gone from it's easy to get an ID to it shouldn't be easy back to it is easy.

     

    You've also gone back to making the repeatedly disproven claim that it is easy to get an ID.  Try working with real world facts.  https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/courts_law/getting-a-photo-id-so-you-can-vote-is-easy-unless-youre-poor-black-latino-or-elderly/2016/05/23/8d5474ec-20f0-11e6-8690-f14ca9de2972_story.html

    Wow, I didn't know they had special rules for latinos, blacks and old people to make getting an ID more difficult.

    • Like 1
  6. 18 hours ago, Bluespunk said:

    No.
     

    If you had the wit to read my post properly you would realise that there is an enquiry opening into the actions of police officers involved in the death of the man these officers were mocking. 

     

    The ex officer who responded “ha ha” is one of those who were involved. 
     

    mmmmmk indeed

     

    Yes, I read that the Colorado governor is retaliating against the photos by trying to find some way to get revenge.

  7. 2 minutes ago, johnpetersen said:

    Whatever the reasons he got those to nominate those judges, they are typical right wing types supported by the Federalist Society. That means that they are anti-labor and pro-corporation. Trump dis nothing special. And as you pointed out, these nominations fell into his lap. It's not like he had to do undertake any initiative.

    Using your logic, the same could be said for any president who nominates SCOTUS judges. Hey, whatever floats your boat. Carry on.

  8. 1 minute ago, johnpetersen said:

    Obviously you didn't read the article. Since it says that donations didn't go to the Biden campaign.

    No, that is absolutely FALSE.

     

    "Owens’ Instagram post features a video showing that BlackLivesMatter.com uses ActBlue for its donations. It then shows an OpenSecrets.org breakdown of expenditures by ActBlue made in the 2020 cycle; the top recipients are the presidential campaigns of Sen. Bernie Sanders, former Vice President Joe Biden, and Sen. Elizabeth Warren."

     

    So it's a matter of public record. You lose. So try and connect the dots: donations to Black Lives Matter are collected by ActBlue. ActBlue donates to Democrat presidential campaigns, including that of Joe Biden. Not difficult to figure out, even with the hilarious attempts by factcheck.org to obfuscate.

     

    Wouldn't it be easier for you to simply admit and accept the truth?

     

     

    • Confused 1
×
×
  • Create New...