Jump to content
BANGKOK 25 May 2019 22:46


  • Content Count

  • Joined

  • Last visited

Community Reputation

188 Excellent

About cbtstorm

  • Rank
    Senior Member

Recent Profile Visitors

The recent visitors block is disabled and is not being shown to other users.

  1. Declass is just the first step. eventually I think this will lead to military tribunals for some of the actors. Treason, sedition are serious charges.
  2. didnt they raise money for this already? now they need 30k again! they should have sold key chain size baby trump to raise the funds but that would be too entrepreneurial for leftist community organizers.
  3. here they go again getting their hopes up based on polls. worked out so well in 2016. Trumps victory exposed that media scam. polls
  4. thats the claim , we will find out in due time if that holds up to scrutiny.
  5. thank you and I was just taking it as humor. so no objections to your colorful language.
  6. and youve got what? collusion? obstruction? give me a break. There was some spying on an oppostion campaign under false pretense,of russia collusion using intel paid for by dnc fusion gps that was never verified before applying for fisa warrants.
  7. he did say ss and himller earlier , go look it up.
  8. Barr will straighten out the obstruction definition. his call, not Muellers. or take it to supremecourt and sort that out. But the origins of the investigations will be investigated. that is reality.
  9. well within the presidents right to fire Mueller but he didnt. didnt even claim executive privilege one time for anything Mueller asked for. what good would firing Mueller do anyway, to replace him with another prosecutor? absurd
  10. surprised you didn't say ss,or himmler like earlier. The goal of the investigation was to get Trump, which is why he was not notified when the illegal surveillance started.
  11. obstruction statue is quite small. interpretation of 18 U.S.C. § 1512(c)(2) is where Barr and Mueller differ. c) Whoever corruptly— (1) alters, destroys, mutilates, or conceals a record, document, or other object, or attempts to do so, with the intent to impair the object’s integrity or availability for use in an official proceeding; or (2) otherwise obstructs, influences or impedes any official proceeding, or attempts to do so [is guilty of the crime of obstruction]. (Emphasis added) Barr - no official proceeding was impeded or influenced and no attempts were shown to impede any official proceedings.
  12. the investigation itself is a fraud from the get go. of you dont like my sources, you'll just find out a little late. no worries
  13. itd be the same argument even from another domain name. impeachment! atleast you have a sense of humour.
  14. easy just take off your 2016 tds filled spectacles, you'll see it clearly. turn off msnbs or whatever rag you read. think about it from opposing view point and evaluate your position and it's lack of accomplishment to date. Eitherway tables have turned. try keeping up. I tried to find an overview for ya, I think this will suffice but only as an intro. https://thenationalsentinel.com/2019/05/17/treason-docs-prove-deep-state-hacks-obama-comey-brennan-and-clapper-aided-russian-efforts-to-divide-americans-with-spygate/
  15. since you know a sitting president cannot be indicted and collusion does not equal to crime, why would you spend 2 years investigating if not to entrap for an obstruction charge. the goal along. prosecutors are known for doing this. most masic method, find a reason to investigate, you'll find something or another and if not go for obstruction. game over, next we find out how this all got constructed.
  • Create New...