Sujo
-
Posts
7955 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Downloads
Posts posted by Sujo
-
-
- Popular Post
- Popular Post
7 minutes ago, worgeordie said:World news is cancelled according to a post from TVF a few days ago.
regards Worgeordie
Well thats not good. It was the most interesting threads and not really finding anything interesting in the current content tab.
-
3
-
1
-
2
-
- Popular Post
- Popular Post
9 minutes ago, WaveHunter said:So what you seem to be saying is that you are the sole arbiter of what is factual and what is not, and anyone who disagrees is simply wrong. That's a very smug view. Unfortunately for you we don't live in an autocracy, and you don't have the absolute power to lecture others on what is right and what is wrong.
Nothing in politics is black or white but only varying shades of gray, so anyone that says there is only one way to explain a controversial issue is being grossly disingenuous. Anyone who patently dismisses the previous administration as being ineffectual or evil can't be taken seriously.
Don't tell me I need a thicker skin. Instead you might consider being a little more tolerant of other people's viewpoints instead of being so pompous as to dismiss other people's viewpoints by attacking them. What you do is absolutely an attempt to "bully" others and aggressively shout down anyone's view that differs from yours.
Regarding your PPS: As usual, you paint a one-sided picture to make your bogus point! FYI, Biden won 51.3 percent of the votes cast. Trump won 46.8 percent of the votes cast. That is not what I'd call a landslide win for Biden! More importantly, it means that a SIZEABLE number of people thought that four more years of Trump was indeed the way to go! But of course, their view is irrelevant to you, I suppose. I guess you must think they are ignorant and uninformed "rubes" as one of your buddies on here refer to them as.
Also you smugly make an ignorant and insulting remark about my view of Chinese people. I made it very clear in many of my posts that my issues with China have nothing to do with the Chinese people, but with China's government, The Chinese Communist Party (CCP)!
I know quite a bit about China, having lived there for several years, and presently have many Chinese friends and business associates living there right now that I work with. So, once again, you expose yourself as a self-righteous and pompous person who has very little respect for anyone who doesn't fall lock-step into your way of thinking.
I don't really care, one way or another, what your political views are. EVERYBODY is entitled to their political views and should be shown respect for having them if they are sincere, BUT I resent your pompous attitude and pretentious remarks, as though you, and only you, are the arbiter of what is factual and true, and what is not.
No, what he is saying is verifiable facts are facts.
Opinions and alternative facts are not.
Btw, trump called his lesser voter win a landslide. So bidens win, according to trump, is indeed a landslide win.
So much losing from an ineffective 1 term 2 times impeached former guy.
So facts are people simply dont want trump.
-
2
-
1
-
- Popular Post
- Popular Post
14 minutes ago, EVENKEEL said:Some accounts say the paramedics had to force Chauvin off of his neck.
Now it sounds like you're making up stuff.
I only hope Chauvin gets a fair trial, as fair as he can expect.
Yes as fair as can be expected for a black man.
Do you have any issues so far about the trial? Maybe that the jury cannot hear that chauvin was fired for his actions?
-
3
-
21 hours ago, pedro01 said:
Biden needs to own these new COVID numbers. He said he'd fix it but its getting worse on his watch.
you blame biden for states refusing to follow his recommendations?
-
1
-
-
58 minutes ago, SunnyinBangrak said:
Disgraceful repeating of fake news.
Quoting directly from the bill - NOTE THE LAST SENTENCE !!!
"No person shall solicit votes [or] distribute or display any campaign material, nor shall any person give, offer to give, or participate in the giving of any money or gifts, including, but not limited to, food and drink, to [a voter] … This Code section shall not be construed to prohibit a poll officer…from making available self-service water from an unattended receptacle to [a voter] waiting in line to vote."
The closure of the world news forum was only a matter of time. Just a shame the forum rules could not have been adhered to - as they are on every other section of the site. After years of depravity encouraging the mocking of Trump's physical characteristics and pushing all unsourced fake news as fact we arrive in 2021. A year where there really is a swamp beast, a corrupt senile old fool in the white house - with unexplainable money links to China and Russia, with rock hard evidence corroborating his family clans corruption in every way possible, of course discussion must be silenced now.
Ah well, c'est la vie.
you proved my point.
It is illegal to give them food and water.
Why on earth do that. How about asking themselves why they have to line up for hours to vote and fix that issue.
-
1
-
-
17 hours ago, jspill said:
He had 11 ng/mL of fentanyl in his blood, several times the lethal dose, along with meth, and covid. That's the whole basis of the defence, and I expect he will be acquitted.
Kneeling on the back of one's neck doesn't cut off their breathing, try it, the windpipe is at the front of the neck. Police wouldn't be trained to do it if it was dangerous. Carrying out training isn't incompetence.
The basis for defense at the moment is that the officers were too distracted by the people watching and complaining.
Are you saying chauvin was fired for doing the right thing?
-
Add to the fact a firefighter first responder wanted to check on him but was denied.
Then after finally being found unresponsive stayed kneeling on him and failed to even try and resucitate him.
-
2
-
-
Why on earth would they make it a crime to give water to those waiting in llne to vote.
-
1
-
-
1 hour ago, jspill said:
He had a history of swallowing drugs and resisting arrest and 'using diversionary behaviour'. He did that when approached by police a year before his death.
And it's very common for people to say 'I can't breathe' in that situation with police since the high profile Eric Garner case in 2014, you can find many youtube videos of perps saying exactly that as soon as the police try to cuff them, as they know it can be legally advantageous.
So much so that the chief of police said it was wrong. The 911 operator said it was wrong. Another officer at the scene said it was wrong.
he was already cuffed so saying he cant breathe is again, nothing to do with him saying that so he wouldnt be cuffed.
floyds history has no relevance, at all.
-
2
-
-
- Popular Post
- Popular Post
5 hours ago, jspill said:They did put him the squad car if you watch the bodycam footage, he got out again and was delirous and non-compliant as he'd swallowed a lethal dose of fentanyl, and then a knee on the back of the neck (it doesn't cut off your breathing, try it, the windpipe isn't there) is the standard protocol they're trained to carry out in that situation.
It should be removed from their training but until it is then nothing was unjustified or racist about one specific cop carrying that out, as they have done to White people, who also died that way (Tony Timpa) but there was no media attention or trial in that case.
There's no statistical evidence of racial bias in policing at all.
His death should not be caused by their incompetence.
He had no lethal dose of anything according to the coroner he died because of the officer kneeling on him.
even another officer questioned him about that need.
the chief of police will give evidence that what chauvin did was not in their training.
perhaps you can link to the statement there is no racial profiling because everything else in your post is demonstrably wrong.
-
3
-
1
-
- Popular Post
- Popular Post
10 minutes ago, SunnyinBangrak said:A good outcome would be for justice to prevail over the woke narrative that is destroying America. If it is deemed with concrete irrefutable evidence that Derek premeditatively planned and carried out Floyds murder then fair enough, throw the book at him. If the court decides that Floyd was a dangerous woman beating criminal, suffering from Covid yet not isolating and was high on various illegal drugs while up to no good, and violently resisting arrest which all led to the unfortunate events then so be it, the cop walks.
Can the court be immune from SJW "justice"? That I am not sure about at all. A real litmus test for the judicial system in our country.
What a load of rubbish.
He is not charged with pre meditated murder and floyds actions are totally irrelevent.
police can use force but not excessive force. The jury needs to decide if the force was reasonable or not.
Considering the 911 operator watching it on camera in real time felt the need to call the police on this officer says a lot.
Also that the chief of police will also testify against what the officer did and the coroner saying his death was caused by what the officer did does not look good for him.
The judge decides law, the jury decides the facts as presented.
-
13
-
4
-
On 3/29/2021 at 1:06 PM, KeeTua said:
A few ice cubes added to each glass of Chang maintains ideal level of hydration for me. I don't wake up thirsty during the night and no leg cramps, urine about the same color as the watered down Chang. Perfect.
You put ice in beer?
Thats blasphemy.
-
1
-
-
On 3/28/2021 at 6:59 PM, KannikaP said:
I filter my tap water, then put it in a bottle! LOL
Funny that on aircraft they give you a small plastic cup of water which says 'PURE BOTTLED WATER' and then goes on to tell you what minerals etc are in it. Pure?
Never ever drink water on a plane unless its bottled. I wouldnt even drink tea or coffee on a plane. They never clean the water tank.
-
1
-
-
On 3/28/2021 at 6:11 PM, KannikaP said:
Are you saying that the 5% alcohol in a bottle of beer will negate the 95 % water?
Yes
https://www.bustle.com/wellness/what-alcohol-dehydrates-most-doctors
-
1
-
-
4 minutes ago, Chomper Higgot said:
Utter nonsense.
There are plenty of mathematical models running on teal time data.
I’m more than a little surprised that somebody who claims to have read a lot of scientific papers is unaware of that fact.
Im not. Considering there are posters that only post on this subject raises suspicions.
-
1
-
1
-
-
Nice to see climate change deniers and conspiracy theorists put in their place by science.
they just cannot compete but its fun watching it.
-
24 minutes ago, muzley said:
Sidney's lawyer will clear it up for you all.
Official Statement from Sidney’s Lawyer
HOWARD KLEINHENDLER, ATTORNEY FOR SIDNEY POWELL, RESPONDS TO MEDIA ALLEGATIONS CONCERNING MOTION TO DISMISS FILED AGAINST DOMINION COMPLAINTNew York, New York March 23, 2021
Yesterday, several news media outlets cut and paste out of context portions of our motion to dismiss the Dominion complaint to “spin” a message that the election fraud allegations that Ms. Powell presented to various courts and to the public were not credible. I’d like to clarify what actually was presented to the court. First, let me be clear: any suggestion that “no reasonable person” would believe Ms. Powell or her comments on the election is false. The language these reports referred to is a legal standard adopted by the courts to determine whether statements qualify as opinions which are exempt from defamation liability.
As the DC Circuit reaffirmed just last week, there is no claim for defamation when the alleged “defamatory” statement is a legal opinion. Ms. Powell’s statements fall precisely into this category. Ms. Powell reviewed sworn affidavits, declarations, expert testimony, and other highly corroborated evidence concerning the election which Ms. Powell filed with the courts and shared publicly. She continues to stand by those opinions today. Our motion, in part, argues that the Dominion case should be dismissed because legal opinions are not grounds for defamation.
In sum, the legal standard of a technical legal defense crafted by the courts has been improperly manipulated by the media to tell a false narrative. Ms. Powell is not backing down or retracting her previous statements concerning Dominion. Dominion’s case lacks legal merit and should be dismissed in its entirety.
Funny how all those affidavits and expert opinions all got thrown out of court becsuse they were worthless.
But by all means, keep the faith.
-
17 minutes ago, muzley said:
There are cases still proceeding through the courts.
waiting for the kraken.
-
1
-
-
- Popular Post
- Popular Post
7 hours ago, howbri said:Why don't we just burn the whole Constitution and be done with it? Why have one?
Well its not that good anyway as its had to be amended a few times.
Dont know why people follow things that were written in another era. Bit like religious nuts holding the bible etc as the be all and end all.
-
6
-
4 minutes ago, Yellowtail said:
It has little to do with the animal hurting too much. If you have been following along, you should know that I was responding to someone that asked why a hunter would want a semi-automatic. I explained that if the animal is not killed instantly, the hunter has to chase the animal down. The hunter does not want to case the animal down, and when the hunter does chase the animal down, the hunter has to drag the animal back. Dragging a 100-300 dear through the woods is not pleasant, particularly as they generally run down hill, and it seems like always away from the camp and or truck.
I understand, you guys don't like guns or hunting, and you seem to hate the people that do.
Oh the poor hunter has to work a bit harder to kill an animal.
But lets not be concerned about people being killed.
-
1
-
-
1 hour ago, Yellowtail said:
With all due respect, I doubt you hunt or shoot or know much about guns.
Semi-automatic firearms have been around for over a hundred years. The are not something new. The reason many hunters prefer semi-automatic rifles is because animals generally do not die instantly unless hit perfectly. Regardless of what the NRA might say, animals do not like being shot, and if you shoot them, and only injure them, they run away, and they often run very far. Animals often have to be shot more than once to be stopped. You do not want to chase the animal too far, and you don't want the animal getting away and taking days to bleed-out.
Again, many people in the US use guns for hunting, plinking, target shooting, protection, collecting and whatever the owner sees fit to use them for. As long as what they are doing is legal, what business is it of of anyone else's why they want them and what they use them for? Shooting and gun owning are activities people enjoy, whether or not they NEED guns is irrelevant. Most people in the US do not NEED a gun, but clearly some people do, and to believe otherwise is foolish.
Most people that own guns in the US do not belong to gun clubs, and many never go to public ranges. People that belong to clubs typically shoot and hunt in places other than the club they belong to. People that shoot at public rages often do not shoot at the same range all the time, and again, their shooting is often not limited to ranges. Also, after shooting, guns typically need to be serviced. Most people do this themselves, and do it at home.
Many people hunt and shoot on their own property and or on public land. It is really no different than fishing, except that it is more difficult to kill someone with fishing gear. Imagine garroting people gets popular, and it turns out spetra/braid was really effective for garroting, so much so that it became the weapon of choice. The government steps in and bans braid, and says you can only use monofilament. Do you think that banning spectra would have any significant effect on the problem?
People in the US have the right to own firearms and to keep them in their homes. There is a vehicle in place to repeal this right. Let the people that want to remove this right gather the support they need and go through the process of repealing it.
Most proposed run control will do little or nothing to slow, much less stop gun violence. What it will do is make it disproportionally difficult for the poor to own guns, while doing nothing to restrict the rich from having guns. Most people posting in this thread seem to applaud this, I do not. I think the poor have just as much right to own a gun as the rich.
Im sure people wont mind doing away with automatic guns so that others can live.
-
1
-
-
On 3/25/2021 at 6:46 PM, simple1 said:
Unless domestic law states otherwise. e.g. Australia permanently refuses entry for any asylum seekers entering Oz territory 'illegally' by sea.
Which has nothing to do with the US border. It also doesnt make any asylum seekers illegal.
-
Thank you placeholder for providing scientific studies to prove your points.
Thank you deniers for proving his points.
-
4 minutes ago, robblok said:
Yes but matches and gasoline are things that are needed. While guns except for hunting are not. Also you don't need semi automatic weapons for hunting. So to compare something that has multiple uses with guns that have one use to kill is a bit different. Because what are guns for, to kill be it humans or animals.
I have never understood why they call them hunters. They are not, they are killers.
Its like using dynamite to blast the water to kill fish. Thats not fishing.
Using guns to hunt is not a sport. To keep animal populations down then let authorities do it.
Pattaya: Eleven year old shoots five year old dead with rifle he found at house
in Pattaya News
Posted
Try proof reading your post and all will be clear.