RideJocky
-
Posts
830 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Downloads
Posts posted by RideJocky
-
-
- Popular Post
1 hour ago, WalkingOrders said:It's all about policy and results, not a fake happy face and being polite. Trump has delivered! I also think that those who refer to the American President as a POS and speak so ill of all the Americans who voted for him, should proudly state their own Country, so such unkind ridicule can be returned, as unkind ridicule is all it is, and not discussion.
It’s only the left that hates him, and that makes him that much easier for everyone else to like him.- 2
- 1
- 2
-
7 minutes ago, TheDark said:
What an earth are you talking about?
FYI: any floating substance displaces its weight of the liquid it stays. So no. Floating iceberg melting is not going to recede nor increase sea level. (except for thermal expansion).
Floating ice is not the problem at itself. The ice on top of the continents is.
Thanks.So if 40% of the ice has melted in the last few years, why has the ocean not risen more?
-
As someone else asked, if 40% of the ice has melted in the last few years and the ocean has only rising a few mm, how is it that when the other 69% melts we’ll all be under water?
Also, when the ice that is currently underwater melts, won’t sea level recede?
-
- Popular Post
- Popular Post
29 minutes ago, Sujo said:Yes. How else could he work in the whitehouse and be on the presidents calls.
The President is responsible for who he has working for him.
Remind me how many gave gone now.
Trump hired everyone in the Whitehouse?- 2
- 1
- 1
-
3 minutes ago, Sujo said:
Yes
So when President Obama felt it was in the best interest of the country to not “answer” all those subpoenas he lacked honor.
And had he “answered” the subpoenas knowing it would damage the United States he would have been doing the honorable thing.
Just want to be clear.
- 1
-
49 minutes ago, Sujo said:
Is it ok for trump supporters to denigrate a purple heart recipient who has dedicated his life to the service of US.
He looks like a soiboy.
Traitor.
Etc.
I said nothing about his looks.
I was just pointing out what hypocrites leftists are when they ridicule others for what they do constantly.
You don’t see it, whatever.
-
10 minutes ago, Sujo said:
He was not the wb so he reported nothing. He did his duty answering a subpoena. Thats what men of honor do.
So when the last administration refused to “answer“ subpoenas it proved the lacked honor, yes?
- 2
-
- Popular Post
- Popular Post
7 minutes ago, scorecard said:And the clowns obvious bias, racism etc., towards blacks and minorities is all A OK?
Only obvious to people on the left.Just like how all the hate, lies and hypocrisy coming from the left are only obvious to people not on the left.
Call him what you like, makes me no never-mind. I think it’s funny.
- 4
-
- Popular Post
- Popular Post
8 minutes ago, RJRS1301 said:Trump could control his weight and hair colour now you mention it, neither of those attributes are genetic, they are lifestyle and choice.
Weak
- 3
-
7 minutes ago, chokrai said:
Did he win the medal of honor?
I think he won a Purple Heart. -
- Popular Post
- Popular Post
5 minutes ago, RJRS1301 said:Judgeing some one for their facial features and expressions over which they have no control, speaks volumes
Yes, every time a leftist comments about Trump being fat or the orange hair thing it speaks volumes.
It speaks to everyone (not on the left) and confirms what hypocrites leftists are.
- 1
- 2
-
- Popular Post
- Popular Post
1 minute ago, Sujo said:You Dont usually need a paragraph.
Everything he stated is fact.
Yes, when a leftist predicts the future it’s “fact”.
But it’s only a “fact” to other leftists, everyone else knows it’s just more lefty nonsense.
- 3
- 2
-
- Popular Post
- Popular Post
9 minutes ago, Mansell said:Of course you thought it was good because you believe everything he says when he is just lying on pretty much everything. Pathetic.
That the left hated it makes it that much better.
- 8
- 1
-
- Popular Post
- Popular Post
I thought it was a good speech.
Lefty’s follow-up? Weak.
- 7
- 1
-
21 minutes ago, stevenl said:
15% never smokers, 20% smokers. So 'more common in never smokers' is not correct.
Did you also look at the numbers? What percentage of the population are active smokers?
Not so many, but the percentage of the population over 40 or 50 that used to be smokers is huge.If 60% of lung cancer victims used to smoke, and assuming the vast majority of victims are over 50 it might not be that statistically significant.
To be clear, I’m not advocating smoking nor do I think it is not a health hazard, but I think the lung cancer issue seems to overshadow the emphysema and heart disease issue. Virtually everyone that smokes cigarettes or inhales cigar or pipe smoke develops respiratory problems.
-
5 hours ago, Eric Loh said:
I suspect they are giving Trump enough rope to be embarrassed in the election.
Nice try at comedy. Truthfully it fell badly flat.
Comedy? -
- Popular Post
- Popular Post
2 hours ago, heybruce said:Not analysis. The link was to a video of Alan Dershowitz stating that the framers of the constitution would not consider a term such as "abuse of power" as being grounds for impeachment.
I'll give you a little credit for attempting to deflect to Mueller, but not much. Really weak.
I think there were few things that the framers of the constitution feared more than a President using the power of the office to invite or coerce a foreign power to interfere in a Presidential election.
I thought you didn’t watch videos?
So you jumped from the it was Trump’s defense to something Dershowitz said about the intent of the framers when they said high crimes and misdemeanors, typical.
I think the framer’s worst fear was big government running roughshod over the population, but I think one half of one branch attempting to run roughshod over the other two and a half branches has to be a close second.
- 2
- 1
-
9 minutes ago, Eric Loh said:
Again nice try. His approval did spike up slightly after the impeachment scandal but still below the 50% rating. In simple words, majority still say he is doing a lousy job.
Perhaps, but still a smaller majority than thought Obama was doing a lousy job at the same point in his first term.
- 1
-
10 minutes ago, heybruce said:
I posted that the Republican Senate does not believe abuse of power is not an impeachable offense. That was the claim of Trump's defense team, and I've heard no Republican Senator dispute it. https://www.nbcnews.com/now/video/trump-defense-claims-abuse-of-power-not-impeachable-offense-78048325608
You can do your own research on why the House took the impeachment approach it did. It's unlikely a thoroughly cowed Republican Senate under the direction of Moscow Mitch would have impeached under any circumstances.
Wow, analysis by NBC news, that’s impressive. Aren’t they one of the sources you were quoting when you were bleating on about collusion and obstruction of justice after the Mueller debacle?
I think there are a lot of things the Senate would remove him from office for, but not for stuff fabricated by the left and promoted by their press.
- 2
-
- Popular Post
11 hours ago, sirineou said:I don't mean to be rude by my following reply , I am sure most of you are otherwise very nice people,and pretty smart in other subjects, or some of you are too young to know better but.
Re-educated would imply some education on the subject where none exists, This is obvious by the quality of the arguments, and the ease all your sides arguments are defeated, to which your side moves on to a different argument, deflects , or simply reply with a laugh emoji.
I challenge your side to defend any aspect of trump's behaviour and I will handily defeat it with supporting evidence. I am very confident in making this challenge because what he did is wrong and a danger to our county, there are no two ways about it, all the rest are rationalizations easily defeated.
What need to be done is a difficult proposition,
I had started a very IMO interesting thread on the dangers of Democracy Which IMO is a very bad form of government, except for all the rest. I believe that some short of basic qualifications for voting need to be applied but then you have the danger of who determines the qualifications and how they are applied. I am sure such process would be usurped by special interest for their own personal gain. Machiavelli's The Prince is interesting reading. But you can't have someone who knows very little about a subject vote on it, for obvious reasons and predictable results. If someone cant even locate a particular country on the map , and knows nothing about it, said person should not have an opinion, again for obvious reasons.
Yes, clearly only really smart people like you (coincidentally all leftists) should be allowed to vote. This is clearly the only way to insure free and fair elections.All we need to figure out how to do it while not having anyone show any form of identification. Maybe set it up so voters are locked out until they pass some sort of test.
- 3
-
- Popular Post
- Popular Post
8 hours ago, heybruce said:Originalist judges and a Republican Senate that doesn't think abuse of power is an impeachable offense. Can anyone else see the contradiction here?
They don’t believe Trump abused his power. How is that a contradiction?
Hey, what happened to all the charges and overwhelming evidence from the Mueller report you were bleating on about a few months ago?
Why was none of that included in the articles of impeachment?
- 3
-
- Popular Post
- Popular Post
3 hours ago, candide said:So, in summary, a cover up, as expected. It has now has been made obvious to anyone during this 'trial' except, of course, to core trumpers.
“core trumpers” apparently includes most all non-leftists.- 3
-
12 hours ago, Eric Loh said:
NYT 31/12/19
Senator Lamar Alexander, Republican of Tennessee, said late Thursday that although he believed that Democrats have proved their case that President Trump had acted “inappropriately” in his dealings with Ukraine
It what the NYT claims he said, they didn’t quote him.
- 2
-
- Popular Post
- Popular Post
45 minutes ago, Mavideol said:easy said but hard to understand for the Trumpists..... he blocked everything and everyone from providing documents or any other records, threats to anybody who may provide info or any documents pertaining to his actions, but he has nothing to hide, how can anybody provide evidence against somebody that doesn't allow anybody to provide the slightest piece of records... but he has nothing to hide and not one time, NOT one time did he invoke executive privilege.... only threatening people with his so called revenge list and that's how my 7 years old reacts to his friends when they don't give him what he wants... but no problem, he's Potus, and as he said, he's above the law
I’ve never said he had nothing to hide.
He didn’t block all of the witnesses and documents. you’re either making that up or just regurgitating what someone else made up.
The House called plenty of witnesses and documents. So many that virtually every leftist posting here swore the evidence of his guilt was overwhelming.
That Schiff did not want to subpoena witnesses is not Trump’s fault.
- 4
- 1
Blue pipe union
in DIY Forum
Posted
As others have said, great for the suction side, not doo great for the pressure side. I like to use a little Vaseline on the seals, and I just hand tighten the “nuts”.