watthong

Well, now you have: Those are your words. Like I said before, your bias is showing. Then adding fake sympathy to injury, or shall I say, hypocrisy: "I feel bad for the LGBs,...their cause is kind of being high-jacked." There is a word for pushing one (sub-) group against another, it's called "snitch." They (the trans) are not hi-jacking the gay cause. It's the likes of you that are doing it. And the same manner you are hell-bent on pushing your propaganda that somehow gays want their same sex marriage to be regarded as "man-woman" marriage. Insidious.

Always take things literally, that's your weak point. Dummies tend to say "hilarious' when they run out of argument. Another fast friend of yours also used the same tactic. (This one 's specialty however is in the pot calling the kettle black, as shown in "we were over-educting our idiots." Yeah this bloke loves to make up new words...)

Pure baloney is more like it. You can always leave it to the anti-vax, read anti-science, read pro-faux-science brigade to come up with their own brand of premium-grade crapola. FYI, The only person whose blood can be considered "pure" is Dracula. He was born with a self-purifying blood system, genetically traceable to the still thriving local bats (according to a tourist-guide whom I hired during my jaunt through the Eastern Bloc this summer...)

"Go look up the booster uptake" =>> Deflect. "And no. No it doesn’t" =>> Deny

But who cares? Really, who cares. Or if you want people to know, why don't you wear a button or something to that effect So they know when to apply social-distancing. That will be a great service to mankind.

Sorry, but you're not wanted from us rice eaters. Thanks anyway for a win-win situation! lol

Yes it does. Read the part you typed yourself: "nobody else seems to want boosters" Who is that "nobody else?" Propaganda much?

As the forum resident fluffer, you have the amazing ability to "blow" AND whistle simultaneously. The average one could only do one at a time, usually blows and then whistles, as a signal they're done with the "blow" part...

No we don't need to see "the text of the draft bill" (in the making) to have a discussion about equal marriage, and all that entails. What makes it "difficult to participate in this discussion" is the amount of garbage thrown in by the anti-gay pundits left and right in order to to distort and/or obfuscate the topic - as you can see on full display on this thread, and as inevitably on any other gay-related issues. You can try to pin them down, and when getting caught, these cowards simply deny what they previously said to wiggle their way out. Often a kick in the right place would see them scoot, tail between their legs. The well meaning folks both straight and gay from the general public/forum simply stay away from such contentious thread as one would from a soi with too many feral looking dogs. I used to disregard the haters but that simply inflamed them further and the thread went down quickly. But at least by confronting them one by one, people who care would have the opportunity to see the hatred and the insanity from these bigots who though vocal and bordering on rabid, are just a small minority and probably would go to their grave still full of bile.

Probably webfact is sending out their own in-house "activists." Personally. I won't have this kind of "activists" working on my gay cause. "Parents," definitely, but "mother and father" as a same sex couple? No way Jose. Are you kidding? Us gays have gone too far in our quest for equality to settle for this parental gender-divider. Such nonsense. Two mothers or two fathers can't do the job? Says who, considering the most commonly heard complaint from straight unions since millennium has been about mothers doing most of the child rearing chores. Nevertheless, the takeaway from outsiders looking in has taken on this twisted interpretation of the term "equal marriage" - embellishing with their own bias such as "one of whom wants to be a man" FYI, bias = "A preference or an inclination, especially one that inhibits impartial judgment." Or let me elaborate on that: the tendency to (mis)interpret other people's words, action or intention, based on one's personal preference or inclination. Thanadech is not asking legislation to legalize his desire "to be a man." He's asking for equal marriage (same sex marriage being equally legal as straight marriage). Which means by doing that he has implicitly conceded that in the eye of the laws, he and his girlfriend are still of the same sex ie woman and woman. Not man and woman. But if you still insist on applying the "man and woman" paradigm onto an "equal marriage" bill that us gay are hoping for, then you''re not only out of place, you're out of touch (and your bias is showing!)

Webfact does what a checkout line tabloid has to do to get readership. Always grab a piece of news by the most sensationalistic angle, regardless whether that angle covers the rule or the exception. With matters regarding gender roles within the LGBTQ group, which is by nature rife with confusion, webfact would add a few potholes here and there to make sure readers have ground to sow their own biases. Case in point: Bias One : "one of whom now wants to be a man," - "One of whom," Thanadech has already gone through sex change, ie he has long passed the "wants to be a man" stage. In his mind he is now a man (whether the laws agree is another matter.) There's no mention of his girlfriend, the one whose child they are raising together, "now wants to be a man" either. Bias Two: (they, the couple, are concerned) the bill doesn't effectively mean: they will be legally considered a man and a woman and the legal parents of those children." This is what Thanadech is quoted as saying in the article" “I want the equal marriage law to be passed. It will make my family complete like any other family of men and women.” Though something might be lost in the translation, "family of men and women" in this context should be understood as "straight family." Thanadech wants equal rights for his family as those of a straight family. No where did he said that there must be a man and a woman to "make my family complete."

In the few local malls that I frequent, now and then they would have on the ground floor a mini-book fair (selling discounted books plus a few tables of stationary and knicknack) just to stir the popular reading interest up I guess. In the (translated from) foreign-language corner, you can find a lot of history books, and among these Hitler/Mein Kampf feature prominently, as if this is the latest trend... Even though this book fair does move around from mall to mall, its stock remains more or less the same. So what can we be hoping- or dispairing rather - from this?

World history interests my Thai partner mightily... However, when it comes to watching "historical movies" - most of these depicting wars - there's still a lot of hitting the pause button to explain things to him. Thais have no idea whatsoever what living in war time might entail (curfew, food ration, checkpoints, bomb raid bunkers, etc.) And so I turn to the shark-attack movies...

"It's about convenience...." and more. In Asia food courts are regarded as something of an institution though most of the time privately owned. I always considered them as the equivalent of a village square for us urban-dwellers. A place to "people watch" your own community. You can pretty much tell how well or how badly they are doing by observing a slice of their daily lives. For rootless foreigners who have no respect or awareness of social customs to barge in and complaint about how the locals live, what they eat/how they spend money, how long "old people enjoying free air-conditioning for the price of one coffee," etc. such behavior is simply uncouth, uncalled for and uneducated.

You're not alone. Same here: I have to ship over loads of second hand books also. Heavy shipping charges, but I don't read books on tablets. There's nothing like the feel of a good paperback in one's hands, or a slab of a coffeetable book that weighs 8lbs. Btw, if you're in BKK check out my Dasa Books recommendation earlier.

My recommendation is Dasa Books (used books) near Prom Pong BTS. Impressive inventory even carries Spanish books. Friendly prices. They update their inventory database daily on their website. The idea is you call them ahead of time f you see something you want, then ask them to hold it for you. If that works (I have never tried) it would be great for out of town visitors. Oh, they also buy back books.

I'm sure some of the university educated Thais would love to have access to English books too - places to browse, affordable prices - but here is the reality on the ground: The one Kinokuniyas in Siam square has reduced its English-language stock considerably, making room for, you guess right, Chinese-language materials. I no longer go there. Asia Books are now mostly children toy/stationary stores. The Annual BKK Book Fair (see photo) as far as English-language books go, have 99 per cent junk, the kind you'll find in US charity shops. (And yes, I have to ship over loads of second hand books also. Heavy shipping charges, but I don't read books on tablets. There's nothing like the feel of a good paperback in one's hands.)

I guess up till now, at your tender old age, you never been taught to keep your gloomy outlook regarding other people's business to yourself? While nobody asks you to "hold your breath" for their own affair? "I hope it is for all those involved" yeah sure we really really believe you meant well-wishes (while predicting gloom and doom on us, "a marriage visa/extension will not be allowed") Oh yes, we have to "wait and see..." However for the likes of you who have neither say nor stake in gay marriage, you don't have to "wait and see..." So get off the line now and scoot. We don't need another busybody hypocrite like you. Go bark up another tree.

Couldn't win the big argument, therefore had to settle on the small one... That spells "pettiness." Then adding a drag-queen Trumper image to support your "small one..." That spells "desperation."

Unfortunately, as far as Immigration is concerned. You still have (those) 3 days to do it, if you rather not then the fines are on you. You can't blame it oh holidays or your personal affair. I personally have witnessed one stubborn farang lady triy to bargain on same scenario to no avail. They shooed her away after making her pay, and didn't bother to even print her a fine receipt.

So what if they do? Unbesknown to your tunnel-visioned farangs, food court is a way of life in the East. It serves a communal purpose and yes, old people are more revered here than in the West. FYI, by Thai laws the supermarkets such as BigC, Lotus are required to open year round to serve the general populace. MY local Lotus foodcourt for its post covid-reopening had all the (basic) dishes prized at 25 baht and they did that for 3 months straight. Where do you get that in your lovely West?

Says who? Merriam and Webster definition of "parents" 1 a: one that begets or brings forth offspring just became parents of twins b: a person who brings up and cares for another foster parents Nowhere does it mention "father and mother" or "the same child." Main point is that gays can do both a) and b ) equally well, if not better. If you want to live by your own standard, fine. Just don't apply it onto others. Thank you very much.

Why adding " just won't sit near them" if "They don't bother me"? Because they are "Old guys on a pension"? What do you have against these folks? Their age or their class? Old guys on a pension, like me, tend to dress nicely (read cleanly,) and mind our own business. Like most customers who eat there actually. And unlike the other kind of farangs: gruffy-looking, sweaty, red-faced ones in shorts and pony tail, running around barking orders in their own language to those behind the counter.

It's sad, Mr ("Can you provide proof/annecdote/hearsay examples of...") One -and- One- Question- Only to hear the sound of one hand clapping... Where's your pal, the one that you sent thumb up emojis to after each and every of his posts? Haven't heard a single beep from him since he got called out recently. You used to kiss the ground he walked on, IIRC. But don't feel abandoned, we do enjoy your company here, as comic relief.

Fact check 1st sentence: How many of those "balanced gay men I know"? Half a million? Or a couple of millions? Fact check 2nd sentence: "The war against discrimination has been won." By whom? Against which discrimination. If it's discrimination against gays, no it definitely has not. Broad, sweeping statements with unfounded facts are called "propaganda."