I concur with this.
Logic dictates the 'dick' considered the steps to be part of the rental property title - who in their right mind builds outside of the property.
Logic dictates the 'dick' would ask politely or rudely the person sitting on them to remove themselves from the property he is renting.
Logic dictates it needs to be determined whether he 'kicked' or 'tripped'.
Therefore logic dictates if he tripped he is merely wrong for rudely telling the Thai to remove their arse from the steps of the property which turned out wasn't part of the property = slap on the wrist.
If it was a kick, then under Thai law = fine.
To revoke a visa based on both media narrative, riling up the plebs, and before its been determined if the 'kick was a kick' is ridiculous and goes against a rules based legal system.
But this is Thailand.
Ask a Thai if they see the video and kick = 'I believe it was a kick', not 'it was a kick'.