Jump to content

Benitostacos

Member
  • Posts

    102
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by Benitostacos

  1. 8 hours ago, stranded81 said:

    Quick clarification - does one have to go to MUANG THONG THANI to get a new stamp to replace the "under consideration" stamp also in addition to applying for the extension with embassy letter?
    Our "under consideration" stamp was valid till APRIL 20TH and we now have an embassy letter that will hopefully allow us to apply for a 30 day extension at MAUNG THONG THANI.

    1. So can we go directly to MTT to get the new stamp (to replace the under consideration stamp) + 30 day extension stamp with embassy letter?
    or
    2. Go the government complex first where we obtained the "under consideration" stamp, have that updated and then go to MTT for the extension with the embassy letter?

    Thank you

    Why oh why did you wait so long to close out your under consideration stamp when the immigration offices have been empty for months.... I believe the normal procedure for updating the "under consideration" stamp is to go to the original location where you initially obtained the stamp. But since so much time has passed, I'm not entirely sure. You may even be able to by-pass this process and just apply for the 30 day extension in Bangkok directly. Perhaps you can try calling the immigration hotline? If you can't get a definitive answer I would probably just go to the original complex first just to be safe. ????

  2. 4 minutes ago, alw22 said:

    Just got back from a small non-Bangkok immigration office and was given an under consideration stamp until Oct 16 and a promised additional 10 days if I return to their office on that date.

     

    I arrived in January on a normal tourist visa exemption and already used my pre-covid 30 day extension.

     

    I used the US embassy letter for this new extension.  They reviewed it carefully, but didn't require any additional documentation, just usual tm7 and 1900 baht.

     

    Awesome, thanks for the update! Do you mind if I ask which office?

  3. 47 minutes ago, FlyingThai said:

    Probably because they got sick of people asking and complaining. Their letter is pretty wishy washy and only asks for assistance. It doesn't say the applicant can't go home and that the situation in the U.S. is so horrible that it's a danger. It also seems to be automatically generated without input of a consular officer or staff member.

     

    If immigration accepts this then so be it but if they need specifics as they did before... no dice!

    From the things I'm hearing thus far I think it'll be fairly easy to obtain the extension with any country's embassy letter. Some immigration offices however may require a few additional documents (e.g. proof of hotel or residence)...along with a little groveling. LOL

    • Like 1
  4. 2 hours ago, vermin on arrival said:

    I called 1178 and they said only the embassy letter was needed. No explanation was required. Just bring the letter with the usual documentation for a 30 day extension, embassy letter and 1900 baht.

    Someone posted this from Chonburi Immigration in a FB group, I swear it's like deja-vu from March all over again.

    chonburiIO.jpg.0773f9772ca3438b920f3bd5d2ba730b.jpg

     

    • Like 1
    • Sad 1
    • Thanks 1
  5. 6 minutes ago, Zikomat said:

    I would be very careful in case you decide to go on overstay after 26 of September. The immigration will definitely start hunting the overstayers as never before. They are money hungry at the moment and getting caught as many overstayers as possible will be their main priority for some time. In places like Pattaya it will be dangerous even to go out for a walk if you are on overstay.

    They'll start hunting 40 days after amnesty ends. That's when the maximum 20k baht overtime fine hits. haha

  6. 20 minutes ago, JacksSmirkingRevenge said:

    People with embassy letters that have gone recently were given a stamp of consideration?  Well, it was a stamp and they were told to come back on the 16th of September.  I wonder if this is done with.  I still think there is a chance of visa amnesty extension or the option to purchase a visa in country.  They're talking about a 270 day tourist visa now. 

    I'm not sure about this time around, but the first round of covid embassy letters that were issued before the amnesty also resulted in a consideration stamp. Supposedly (according to the IO in KhonKaen), the paperwork was sent to the main office for approval, although as far as I know everyone got approved.

     

    Looking back, jumping through the hoops to get that letter (as well as all the ridiculous paperwork) was pointless, because I actually went on amnesty along with everyone else about a week after I submitted it. 

     

  7. 11 minutes ago, Peter Denis said:

    Unfortunately when reading the article, it becomes obvious that the 'unlimited 30 day extensions to stay' are conditional.

    Gen Pornchai explained that any tourists unable to return home after Sept 26 due to illness are to apply for an extension to stay by applying at an Immigration office and presenting a medical certificate to prove they are unfit to fly.

    However, those who are unable to return home due to lack of flights or other circumstances in their home country must present a letter from their home country’s embassy or consulate in Thailand requesting that the foreign be allowed to continue to temporarily stay in the Kingdom, Gen Pornchai added.

    So nothing new, and a misleading header and intro, with the ugly monkey coming out of the sleeve later on in the article.

    True, but it does seem (from the statements made in the press conference) that if one can get a letter from their embassy they should get the 30 day extension without any issues, where as before there was some doubt.

     

    I'm not sure about the folks who can't get letters though. ????

    • Like 1
  8. 1 hour ago, Wallabi said:

    Interesting question.

    I'm in a similar situation, I have a 30-day visa exemption, like you, except I've already used my 1-month extension back in April just before the amnesty (unlucky). So from what I understand, this means that if the amnesty isn't extended, I'm basically screwed and I have to leave. Is that correct?

    I'm in a similar situation as yourself but with a 60 day tourist visa, I used a 30 day extension as well as the covid extension (although I didn't have to use that one technically). I'm just waiting for an official announcement from the Thai government regarding the amnesty, but preparing myself to leave just in case.

    • Like 1
  9. 38 minutes ago, GeorgeCross said:

     

    wife was following this story from the thai side and last night said the feeling is that internationals (i don't want to say the f... word) are not the target of immigration reopening but neighboring countries citizens are. there's a worry that they are struggling to support themselves and find work in the current climate.

     

    probably going home and blabbing that they caught covid here didn't win too many friends either lol

     

    anyway just passing on her opinion.. one more for the pile

     

     

    I do remember reading an editorial awhile back about a country by country implementation of the amnesty possibly being a solution, although it would be nearly impossible for this government to probably draw up. LOL

  10. It's impossible to say what the government will do, but I haven't heard any news about the visa amnesty topic being discussed at this point. I booked a ticket for the end of July back to the US, but I too am hoping for an extension and at the very least hope that the government makes an announcement about the amnesty by the middle of July.

  11. 3 hours ago, BritTim said:

    Travel bubbles are based on the idea that you only allow people to enter Thailand just after they leave another Covid-19 free country. Your passport is irrelevant. There may be restrictions based on xenophobia, but there is absolutely no logical reason why someone who has been through quarantine in Vietnam should not then be allowed to travel to Thailand, assuming a travel bubble is in place.

    I totally agree that this is how things should be done. However, before Cambodia locked down their borders, they were refusing admittance to US passport holders (but not Thai citizens) coming from Thailand, even though these passengers clearly had not been in the US for a long duration of time. I was informed of this by the US embassy when I was attempting to travel several months back from Thailand.

    • Like 1
×
×
  • Create New...