Masterton

A bigger load of claptrap, I have not read of late. I can't be bothered to address every ridiculous point, but just to educate you, the confederacy and the KKK were creations of the Democrat Party. You're welcome.

FWIW, I was looking for a synching solution to maintain backup copies of my drives and I "auditioned" a few of the programs that were highly ranked in the best of lists. I ended up choosing to use one called Synchredible made by a German software company called Ascomp. So I recommend you try that one and see if it suits your needs. It is also totally free for personal use.

Yeah I don't think that is correct... The visa is valid for 6 months meaning you can only use it up until the expiry date. If you enter 1 day before the visa expires then you can get stamped in for 2 months (plus you can extend 1 month at immigration), so techinically you can get +/- 9 months usage out of it, but there is no resetting the validity date upon re-entry that I am aware of.

What are you blabbering on about? How about you share with us where in my post (which you quoted), I said anything about the state should own the means of production? 🙄

Yes indeed... Funny how they never refer to themselves in articles as "far left" or "hard left", ever noticed that? The UK barely has a center anymore, you get to choose between left and far left.

Nice to see some of the posters on this thread have been let out of their straightjackets long enough to contribute to the thread. The article, in referring to CPAC as "hard right", should already tell you all you need to know about the source (The Guardian... 🙄) and their readership.

This is why you should never stick your stick in crazy... Bet her boyfriend had fun while it lasted though... 🤐

Don't you ever tire of simply repeating Democrat propaganda talking points? Trump did not "send a mob" to the Capitol. Stop talking nonsense. You also know damn well what he meant when he said "fight like hell", just like virtually every other politician has said in the past, including Democrats. Furthermore, the "rampage" at the Capitol started before Trump said that people "should march peacefully and patriotically to make their voices heard". The people who determined that the stolen election was "a lie" were the people on the side of those who "won" it. The people who stormed the Capitol did not do so "after being sent there by Trump". You are the one who needs to "keep up". With reality. Trump offered 10,000 National Guard to protect the Capitol and this offer was turned down by Pelosi. One can only wonder why. You ask "what audit" shows suspicious results? Perhaps you fail to recall that the Democrats opposed any audits be done (Not suspicious at all right?). A recount is NOT an audit, and logic would dictate that illegal ballots would still be counted in a recount, it is not rocket science...

2016 called.... It wants it's fake news back... 🙄

Lol.. The NY Times is a great example of fake news. If you think they are a credible news source, then you greatly mistaken... Er... no. Perhaps you should research this a bit more and delve into it a bit deeper. You will not find what you are looking for in the NY Times, Washington Post, CNN, MSNBC etc. They lied and promoted this hoax and then failed to report / cover up all the evidence that proved it to be a setup. Anyway, not going to get into this topic, and will not comment on it any further.

The reason why the cable news networks gave him "ridiculous amounts of airtime for free" (did they charge the Clinton campaign for airtime?), was two fold. Firstly, he was good for ratings and they cashed in on his popularity/unpopularity. Secondly, being that they were mostly all in the tank for Clinton/Democrats, they believed he would not win. How wrong they were. If Trump ran as a Democrat, they MSM would not have attacked him the way they did, promoting pseudo events and hoaxes in order to try and discredit his policies and popularity and/or lying and covering up for his opponent. The MSM has a history of attacking Republicans, it is not something unique to Trump. But Trump was the first one to fight back and call them out on it. The fact that you "would definitely believe MSM stories" is self evident, but we're all still waiting for evidence that Trump colluded with the Russians... 🙄

Not sure he made up the tag MSM, but he was certainly the first 'mainstream' person to use the term 'fake news', which is basically a simplified way of stating that the media create pseudo events and then use them as an excuse to slander people. I completely disagree that Trump drew first blood, in fact Trump was the first person to stand up to the dishonest media and fight back. The media mercilessly attacked Trump from the moment he declared he was running for President, mainly because he committed the cardinal sin of running as a Republican. If Trump ran as a Democrat, he would be their darling.

Why are you still persisting with this? Firstly, I pointed out to another low-information fake news consuming sufferer, who posted a link entitled "Trump vows to expand Muslim ban if he wins presidency", that THERE WAS NEVER ANY MUSLIM BAN. It was a dishonest headline, and that was the point that I made. Especially as I pointed out that nowhere in the article did it attribute any of Trump's claims or quotes to specifically banning Muslims. Typical fake news. Secondly, you injected yourself into the situation by claiming rather ridiculously that the article in question said "nothing about a ban on all Muslims" when it was literally how the article was framed with the headline, and it was in reference to the headline posted that I was responding. I am not letting anything "misguide me as to reality", as I am the one pointing out the reality.

Yes, I am fully aware that purveyors of fake news propaganda and anti Trump conspiracy theories "commonly" refer to the travel ban as a "Muslim ban", that is the whole point... And no, it is not "more accurately called a Muslim travel ban", and no, it (a Muslim ban) did not happen. A travel ban comprising several countries which were failed states or associated with terrorism were on the list, the fact that a lot of them were Muslim majority is completely irrelevant. Just as the fact that some of the countries were in Africa is irrelevant. Unless you are implying that all Muslims are terrorists? Interesting... 🙄 Interesting too how the the worlds top 6 most populous Muslim countries, comprising approx 1 BILLION Muslims, mysteriously did not appear on the travel ban? Wierd..... 🙄 But yeah sure, a "Muslim travel ban" happened....

Just curious if you are actually aware of the bill in question? It does nothing to solve the border issue, unless you think legalizing illegal immigration and speeding up the process by which fake asylum seekers can become citizens constitutes "solving the border issue" ?? The bill is a total disaster, regardless of who wrote it and who did or didn't vote for it. Furthermore the bill is totally unneccessary as the president can solve or worsen what is going on at the border by exectutive order, no bill is needed. Howabout he start by enforcing existing law? Just a suggestion.