Jump to content

realfunster

Advanced Member
  • Posts

    1476
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by realfunster

  1. 7 hours ago, webfact said:

    From 2022 to 2024, living costs in Bangkok dramatically dropped by over 50%, from US$2,715 to a reasonable US$1,048 per month.

     

    Dear AseanNow - this article appears to be under your name and ownership.

     

    Got any evidence/references for this claim ? By the way, it's a 61% cost of living reduction based on your figures.

     

    Below is a Thailand inflation chart to get your critical thinking juices flowing. Your credibility is at stake...and I do hope this is not a sign of the quality we should expect going forward after the recent business restructuring.

     

    image.png.9b539013f1903a514d10ecdf7e6ca2bd.png

    • Thanks 2
  2. Whilst noting this crossing appears to have lights/signals and it would appear the driver simply wasn't looking - else he would have the seen the victim striding out, it's well overdue to have a single standardised zebra crossing project in Bangkok.

     

    There appear to be several different types of crossing (lights/no lights/lights set up ridiculously high etc), which I think can lead to bad habits and confusion for both drivers and pedestrians. 

     

    Examples off the top of my head would be the numerous crossings with no lights on Sukhumvit from Phrom Pong down to Pra Kanong where pedestrians are taking their lives in their own hands and drivers get accustomed to simply stopping out of "goodwill", getting into the habit of ignoring the pedestrian crossing road markings. Those markings should be ingrained to generate a vehicle stop (perhaps wishful thinking) or at least extreme caution. 

    • Agree 1
  3. 19 minutes ago, Peabody said:

    What is the payoff for Sretta and his friends to keep calling for this rate reduction? 

    I assume roughly the same as any government looking to cut interest rates :

     

    - reduction in debt interest gives more room for corporate and personal spending, potential economic boost

    - likely leading to a weaker Thai baht - good for exports & tourism

     

    It would seem that inflation appears reasonably under control, so I would be asking the other Q - why are BoT not reducing interest rates from 2.5% ? 

    • Confused 1
  4. On 4/7/2024 at 9:55 AM, sandyf said:

    Foreigners in Thailand want as much as they can get for as little as possible, they have no say and the government has no interest. 

    The Thai space program started in 1971, remind us what was your "giant" focused on at that time, certainly not the well being of its own population, or any other.

    People ought to remember the old adage on "sin" and "stones".

    I'm not really clear what you are trying to communicate :

     

    1) If you are saying my opinion doesn't matter to Thai government, that's already understood but I can have a viewpoint - correct ?

    2) Not sure what you are talking about, my comment was aimed more at the "now" and piggy-backing others space programs (and other "fashionista" issues) whilst there undoubtedly more prosaic concerns and spending priorities for the average Thai citizen. If you are going back to the 70s to discuss "giants" and their space programs, then presumably you are referring to either Russia or US, anyway, not relevant.

    3) I don't understand the link between this and my post. 

     

    Anyway, my point remains, go and walk around the Bangkok slums or pretty much anywhere outside of Bangkok and come back and tell me it's a good use of Thai taxpayers' money. 

     

     

     

    • Agree 2
  5. 12 hours ago, sandyf said:

    The Thai satellites are being used for data collection, not broadcasting. Of course many on here would prefer to ridicule the well being of the Thai population.

     

    The Minister of MHESI also added.“THEOS-2 is an advanced space infrastructure which is essential for the country. The data collected by THEOS-2 will be utilized to ensure that geospatial information across all regions of Thailand remains current, up-to-date, and accurate. This data will aid in the efficient management of disasters and emergency situations. THEOS-2 will also increase our capacity in natural disaster management, water management, agricultural management, urban planning and natural resources management, which underscores the necessity of science and technology in national development and the improvement of the well-being of our people.”

    https://www.mfa.go.th/en/content/pr-theos2-10092023-2?cate=5d5bcb4e15e39c306000683e


    What a surprise that the minister involved has a reasonable looking soundbite to justify his department’s existence and spending. I recall seeing plenty of satellite images during the floods in 2011 and over the last decade with our persistent poor air quality issues. It would appear alternatives already exist.


    Certain elements of Thai society love nothing better than implementing the latest international trends from developed countries. The problem is, the wider societal foundations for these are not yet in place.


    Rather than standing on the shoulders of giants and messing around with vanity projects such as space exploration and submarines, below is a list of what I would describe as much higher priority spending issues for “the wellbeing of Thai people”.

     

    Education

    Health services

    Social and old age care 

    Water/flood management infrastructure - engineering/construction 

    Air quality management

    Road safety

     

     

    • Agree 1
  6. I ... did a quick Google. 

     

    https://www.cdc.gov/respiratory-viruses/background/index.html

     

     

    This article from early March is an interesting read...below some excerpts which don't 100% state "it's flu" but the message is clear. Data in the link indicates that flu deaths are now similar COVID deaths for 23-24, and as the CDC openly state, it is probable that flu deaths are/have been understated for several years now. This is not to downplay the massive impact of COVID during 20-21-22 but merely their opinion on the matter. Below the hospitalisations graph for the period, which show COVID falling to comparable flu-type levels, although the seasonal variations seems different. 

    4a

    "The 2023-2024 fall and winter virus season, four years since the start of the COVID-19 pandemic, provided ongoing evidence of the changing face of respiratory diseases. COVID-19 remains an important public health threat, but it is no longer the emergency that it once was, and its health impacts increasingly resemble those of other respiratory viral illnesses, including influenza and RSV."

     

    "As the threat from COVID-19 becomes more similar to that of other common respiratory viruses, CDC is issuing Respiratory Virus Guidance, rather than additional virus-specific guidance. This brings a unified, practical approach to addressing risk from a range of common respiratory viral illnesses, such as influenza and RSV, that have similar routes of transmission and symptoms and similar prevention strategies."

     

     

  7. Well, one thing is for sure, you can smell the economic panic oozing from every pore.

     

    A period that should have seen Thailand kick-on economically post demographic dividend appears to have been largely wasted over the past 30 years. I offer no comments on that, you can make your own evaluations. 

     

    Anyway, Thailand is now staring down the barrel of a very real socio-economic crisis on the horizon with a reducing workforce and aging population. 
     

    What Srettha failed to mention was that any such casinos will probably be staffed by Burmese or Laotians, who will be repatriating their earnings home…just look at the recent crane collapse, a Chinese firm employing migrant workers. Who knows what the supply chain is but you could imagine that the benefit to Thailand from all of that is marginal at best. 
     

    The economic panic is justified and I would not be at all surprised to see a raft of “creative” solutions being touted over the coming years. 

  8. 3 hours ago, waders123 said:

     

    Until same-sex marriage is officially announced as being legal in the Gazette, it is only an idea. Legalizing same-sex marriages should have happened 15-20 years ago; Thailand could have been benefiting all these years from the influx of money and set the standard as the preferred destination for the LGBTQ+ community in Southeast Asia.  It's not too late to turn this around and capitalize on it before neighboring countries legalize same-sex marriages and start aggressively vying for the "Gay dollar."

     


    Blimey, and many on here are quick to criticize the Thais for being money obsessed…

     

    In response to your specific comments, as the article notes only Taiwan and Nepal have taken this step so far, so not sure how Thailand has lost ground on this issue.
     

    I would have thought that Thailand would have been seen as a pretty welcoming and tolerant destination for LGBTQ+ for a long time already?
     

    A brief Google indicates lots of potential legal/rights/societal challenges (and I don’t mean just not being able to marry) for LGBTQ+ across most of SEAsia and Asia, I didn’t bother checking Malaysia and Indonesia for obvious reasons….

     

    Anyway, a decision to be applauded and let’s hope the Senate dinosaurs don’t block it. 

    • Thumbs Up 1
    • Agree 1
  9. 1 hour ago, les1 said:

    Last year we flew Air Asia to Penang my wife needed a wheelchair I paid 300 baht for this , on arrival no wheelchair dropped out on the tarmac. Eventually wheelchair arrived but no one to push her I was told that I looked fit enough so push it. They offered my money back & it took 12 months with so much pressure obviously 300 baht is neither here nor there but the ordacity of this company shows that they couldn't care less for your wellbeing. 


    You’ll know the ins and outs better than me but aren’t these kind of services provided by the airport or another agency and not the actual airline itself ?

     

  10. It seems difficult to wind this back both on retail and production.

     

    I expect some tightening of licensing & regulations may be implemented. 
    These might, coincidentally, limit the licenses to, ahem, “approved”, producers and vendors to reap the benefits. 

     

    For sure, there’s been foreign companies investing heavily in this space, and setting up production facilities here for export back to US/Canada. It would be disastrous for foreign investor confidence and possibly lead to legal actions if they fully retrace to the previous laws.

    • Agree 2
  11. On 3/9/2024 at 1:15 PM, Jonathan Swift said:

    I Sued Thai Air Asia last year, through priceline (whose office, Booking Holdings,  is right near my house in the US) because they refused to refund my $165 ticket after they rescheduled my flight. Cost priceline $1000 US to settle with me. I also posted it all over facebook. So for messing with me over petty cash they lost 8 x what they could have gotten off with, plus after my review was posted very likely lost a few hundred paying customers at least. I can tell you first hand that the airline is run by and staffed with idiots. And so is priceline and their entire group of agoda, expedia, and booking dot com. And with every story like this the airline loses a hundred or more customers. So what will they do, raise prices to cover THOSE losses? And so it goes. 


    Sorry to hear about your problems.
     

    I think you are misunderstanding the budget airline business model.

     

    One of the most complained about airlines is Ryanair, their customer services department have the charm of a hungover undertaker, yet it continues to go from strength to strength.

     

    Cheap as chips prices for a very basic and inflexible service - all variations/add ons from the standard package to be paid for. People keep returning for this very reason.

     

    A few unhappy customers griping on the internet does not put anyone off, let alone hundreds.

     

    In fact, I think they even enjoy the complaints and they spin it as evidence that they are constantly fighting to keep their prices down.

     

    IMG_0177.png

    • Love It 1
  12. On 3/9/2024 at 10:10 AM, Tropicalevo said:

    If the government wants air fares to be lower, it should subsidise them. Not tell airlines what their pricing policy will be.

    The travellers will decide if an airline is too expensive or not.


    Yep, nail meet head.

    I’m sure there’s plenty that AOT and the Government could do to reduce prices unilaterally.

     

    I am “flabbergasted” your reasonable and common-sense post got two “confused” emoticons.

    Waiting for those two people to expand on their compelling counter-arguments…

    • Confused 1
    • Thanks 1
  13. 15 hours ago, lordgrinz said:

    So 1 out of every 7 Thai citizens needed treatment for pollution related illnesses? Sounds like a great place to retire or vacation, don't forget to pack your respirator!

     

    Of course, these figures, like many here, are a complete nonsense. There is no way that such a high a proportion and overall number of people have sought medical treatment for this reason.

    How do I know ? Literally no-one in my personal/work circle of several hundred has ever mentioned this and I have never seen a sick leave request on the topic....

     

    Anyway, I give these spurious statistics a free pass as they are rightly drawing attention to this issue - which needs urgent action !

  14. 8 hours ago, webfact said:

    In related news, an unruly British man was arrested after his flight from Bangkok to London Heathrow landed following a cowardly attack on a Thai Airways member of staff. The 35 year old unnamed British man went berserk only minutes after the flight from the Thai capital took off on February 7 and proceeded to smash up the aircraft’s toilet.


    Dear Thaiger/Khun Puntid/AI Bot,

     

    Could you clarify how is this even vaguely related to the news regarding BAs plans for their business operations globally and across SE Asia ? Answers on a postcard please…

     

    Regards, RF.

    • Thanks 1
    • Agree 1
  15. 1 hour ago, bamnutsak said:

    I can't understand why a Real Estate Tycoon/Prime Minister/Finance Minister would want lower interest rates.

     

     

    If the Thai interest rate (2.5%) starts getting nearer to other countries rates, particularly the Fed (currently 5%+ but expected to drop), that will likely encourage foreign capital inflows, which will strengthen the Baht.
     

    Many on here will be changing their tune at that point…:whistling:

     

    Economics is a very complicated subject matter, well above my pay grade, but there might be a train of thought from the Government that an immediate drop in interest rates, further widening the gap with US rates gets them “ahead of the game” and would probably result in a weakening of the Baht.
     

    That might be positive for some key economic sectors in Thailand, tourism, property and exports to name but three. Holding interest rates at around current levels with the Fed expected to be dropping rates throughout the year might see the interest rate gap closing and may have the opposite impact. 

     

     

×
×
  • Create New...