Jump to content

teatree

Advanced Member
  • Posts

    1583
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by teatree

  1. On 6/30/2023 at 3:42 PM, ChaiyaTH said:

    I have done my visa for a non-o single entry visa based on a child, see all highlights below:

     

    Experience itself and details:

    • Extremely busy it seems as reported earlier, I think even on tuesday or wednesday this is similar.
    • Tuk tuk / fixers offer to cut you in front of the entire queue for 500 baht, I did this and yet it still took over 2 hours, to process just 35 people or so.
    • My application itself was in under 30 seconds, no questions asked, number given and collected the next day.
    • Many tourist visa applications were refused, including a friend who was travelling with me, this while he never had a tourist visa this year before, german, 100K euro in bank, ticket, hotel booked.
    • Laos visa rip off now 1800 baht cash + 100 baht on departure. It is worth it to change it into USD I think.

     

    Documents used for this application:

    • Original passport + copy of passport page, signed.
    • Copy ID Thai mother / girlfriend, signed.
    • Copy birth certificate, signed + original to show on application.
    • Copy house book registration both my son and mother / girlfriend, signed.
    • Application form with 2 pictures + 2000 baht

     

    To conclude: for non-o visa it is still a hassle free place, bring a umbrella for both sun and rain, as well consider paying the 500 to cut in front, well worth it.

    Did the helper march you to the front of the line to wait, or were you just called over at the appropriate time to hand the docs in?

  2. On 12/13/2021 at 4:55 PM, richard_smith237 said:

    how are people still struggling with this ???

     

     

    Vaccinated people have less chance of contracting Covid-19 in the first place... thus, those who don’t contract Covid-19 won’t spread it !!!!....  unless of course we have a waiter handling a glass which is all some posters seem concerned about !!! ????

     

    Additionally, in aggregate vaccination reduces the symptoms in breakthrough cases, thus those who suffer breakthrough cases suffer symptoms for a more brief period than those who are not vaccinated and are thus contagious for a shorter period of time and cough less, sneeze less and generally transmit less. 

     

    The idea that Vaccinated and unvaccinated people present the same risk of transmission highlights how significantly some people fail to understand this very basic principle. 

     

     

     

    The data from the UK for months now has been suggesting that for certain age groups you a more likely to be infected if you are VACCINATED.

     

    https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/1043608/Vaccine_surveillance_report_-_week_51.pdf

     

    This is the UK Covid surveillance report.  Table 11 on p40 shows that for the ages 18 - 69 it is the VACCINATED who are more likely to be infected (per 100,000) than the unvaccinated.  For the age group 40 - 49 you are more than twice as likely to be infected if vaccinated.

     

     
    • Like 1
    • Haha 1
  3. 5 hours ago, cdemundo said:

    That is a false analogy.

    Those 3 are intractable public health problems that have multiple causes and to the extent that they are manageable, take time to correct.  ( Anti-smoking programs have taken decades to show progress for instance.)

     

    If you have a solution to these problems other than to blame those that have them; keep your phone handy, the Nobel prize committee is trying to reach you.

     

    The difference with the non-vaccinated that they can become vaccinated with one or two trips to the clinic.

    Ahhh changing the goalposts when your hypocrisy gets exposed.  Predictable.

     

    Smokers/the obese have known the risks of their life choices for years yet carried on regardless.  I don't think they should be denied treatment, but if you are going to be an authoritarian at least have the decency to be somewhat consistent,

    • Haha 2
  4. On 8/24/2021 at 4:36 PM, HappyExpat57 said:

    There's no question the FDA is crooked as a dog's hind leg. As such, the creators of ivermectin would gladly send their version of brown envelopes and the FDA would accept them if there were any chance this animal deworming product was viable for Covid. Instead, the FDA posted this (as a result of many calls to the Poison Control Center because people were getting sick from taking ivermectin):

     

    fda-1.jpg

    The spin on this is so strong I am surprised it didn't create a tornado.  What about morphine?  That is used in animals.  Should cancer patients refuse it because it happens to be used in animals?

    • Confused 1
    • Sad 1
  5. 13 hours ago, BusyB said:

    They are also taking up beds for others in serious need of ICUs, which has resulted in massive delays of cancer OPs for instance.

    The problem with them is, whether or not they are deluded or clinically insane, they are very definitely immature - and therefore cannot understand that it's not about 'their' 'freedom'. It's about others.

     

    What about smokers, the obese, those with lifestyle induced diabetes etc..? 

    • Sad 2
  6. 28 minutes ago, Danderman123 said:

    Wow. How much misinformation can you pack into a post?

     

    the best way to promote mutations is to vaccinate a small portion of the population, as you suggest. 

    The best way to promote mutants would be to slowly roll out the vaccine (9 months in and some countries barely have 50% vaccinated) and at very different rates in different countries.  Which is exactly what is happening now.

    • Like 1
  7. 9 minutes ago, The Cipher said:

    You are right about this, but I've realized that it's a surprisingly difficult point for others to accept. Regular people just aren't used to thinking in percentages.

     

    And sure, we can complain about that, but the truth is that complaining isn't really helpful to actually solving the problem.

     

    Practically, it's better to just accept that the majority view carries policy consequence. Yeah, your quoted solution above would probably work out fine for societies if everyone bought in and just accepted it. But the reality is that, based on the messaging of the past two years, many people aren't prepared to accept it. You can see that in some of the other responses to your comments above.

     

    So what's the right thing to do? Get vaccinated. You may or may not feel that you need the vaccine personally, but every incremental person vaccinated helps us move closer to the herd immunity threshold. Being right is fun and all, but ultimately we should really just want to put this entire thing behind us. Right now getting vaccinated is a low risk, low effort act, and it seems like the most direct path towards getting back to a normal world.

    What about people who have recovered from covid?  They have a more robust immunity than the current vaccine which wanes after only a few months.  Surely there is no need for them to be vaxed.

     

    The problem with vaccinating the entire population is that it will drive mutations, as the virus evolves to the changing environmental pressures (which will inevitably be eroniously blamed on the unvaxed) .  We should have vaxed the most vulnerable and left everyone else that has a greater than 99% chance of survival.

    • Haha 1
  8. 1 hour ago, jerrymahoney said:

    Well for whatever reason it was removed, this is what it said for Phuket as of an hour ago when I posted the link: 

     

    Phuket International Airport

    Passengers arriving from highly restricted and restricted areas or dark red 10 provinces;  Bangkok, Samut Prakan, Nonthaburi, Pathum Thani, Nakhon Pathom, Samut Sakhon, Songkhla, Pattani, Yala, Narathiwat, Phra Nakhon Si Ayutthaya, Chachoengsao, Suphan Buri, Saraburi, Chainat, Nakhon Nayok, Nakhon Sawan, Ang Thong, Uthai Thani, Prachin Buri, Singburi, Lopburi, Ratchaburi, Samut Songkhram, Kanchanaburi, Ratchaburi, Phetchaburi, Prachuap Khiri Khan, Chonburi, Rayong, Nakhon Ratchasima, Tak, Nakhon Si Thammarat, Krabi, Ranong, must comply with the following:

     

    1. Must have completed 2 doses of COVID-19 vaccine or complete dose of each vaccine. For AstraZeneca must have vaccine more than 14 days or recover from illness with COVID-19 not more than 90 days or have a test certificate for COVID-19 by RT-PCR method or Rapid Antigen Test within 7 days from the date of test.

     

    2. Download “MorChana"(หมอชนะ)application on your mobile and agree to enable location sharing throughout the duration of your stay in Phuket.

     

    3. Online registration through website www.gophuget.com to inform your information of traveling to Phuket.

    No limit in terms of how long it has been since you received 2 shots (even though the evidence is clear that it wanes considerably after a few months).  Yet if you have recovered from cover (the best form of protection as studies are increasingly showing) there is a 90 day limit.  Utter BS.

    • Like 1
  9. On 12/17/2020 at 3:06 PM, spidermike007 said:

    I do not get what the big deal is. Anything other than breathing, eating, and sleeping, anything done every day, tends to get boring and monotonous. Take a day off! Or stock up in advance, if you do not possess any self discipline. This is such a tiny thing to be wigging out about. Is life really that boring, that one day without a visit to a bar is that hard?

    What about someone who doesn't drink very often and just wants to go out on a Saturday night for a nice meal and a few drinks? 

     

    What about the dying entertainment industry that is going to suffer as a result of this?

     

    I am guessing the alcoholic have long stocked up on booze for tonight, they will be fine.

    • Like 1
    • Haha 1
×
×
  • Create New...