Jump to content
BANGKOK

mokwit

Advanced Members
  • Content Count

    1,328
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Community Reputation

1,963 Excellent

2 Followers

About mokwit

  • Rank
    Super Member

Previous Fields

  • Location
    UK

Recent Profile Visitors

5,678 profile views
  1. Please clarify my "type" of posting history. One thing I have noticed is that there are people on this board who almost only, maybe only appear in political threads - you never see them posting an answer in a "where can I buy a XXXX' thread. You are of that type, and that is mostly your history. Now, what "type" am I?
  2. I'm not going to go even that trouble for you - on a previous occasion you referred to me as 'the far right' and when I asked you to clarify you posted a definition that included Neo Nazis. That is offensive to me, but the real point is there is no point in engaging with someone who calls someone who is not in the same camp as them as 'the far right'/a Neo Nazi. In the last few minutes links from people I follow have been from FT, SCMP, Zerohedge Reuters, NYPost but that tells you nothing as you don't know how much credibility I attach to each of these sources and many are less mainstream - if you are sitting there thinking Aha Gotcha! because it includes Zerohedge then I have to tell you I don't regard it as any more credible than The Guardian - but I look for fact in an article as I would with The Guardian, ignoring any bias. Zerohedge reports things The Guardian does not. Same with Breitbart e.g crime figures culled from court records which the MSM does not report. These records are facts, their interpretation is something else. I am after the facts. I reiterate: Example: If I had read only the Guardian and not The Sun and the Daily Mail on the day the "children" from Calais landed I would have not got the correct picture - The Guardian showed apicture of a toddler on a tricycle while the others showed the truth - adult men posing as children - irrefutably so. Laughably, The Guardian who had been showing "refugee" Kiddie pictures daily suddenly declared showing photos of the Calais "children" landing in the UK would be contrary to their human rights.
  3. It is a perfectly good answer, I am explaining I use extremely broad sources, many not MSM - I am not going to even begin to waste time listing them - even if I could remember sources I may have looked at once. What you want every person in my twitter feed? I rely on people who are good aggregators.
  4. The fact that they are MSM and thus treated as accepted sources by TVF does not actually mean they are credible. As for my sources: very broad and numerous from people in my twitter feed who highlight good sources - includes both the Left and the Right and mostly not MSM, sometimes scientific journals, because when both sides on the MSM are pushing a narrative, reading widely is the only way to get some feel for what the truth of something is. What were you expecting - Breitbart and Daily Caller/Fox News - Mirror images of The Guardian BBC and CNN. I have looked at all of those named, right and left - Breitbart not for months since they sunk to the dishonesty level of the Guardian. Example: If I had read only the Guardian and not The Sun and the Daily Mail on the day the "children" from Calais landed I would have not got the correct picture - The Guardian showed apicture of a toddler on a tricycle while the others showed the truth - adult men posing as children - irrefutably so. Laughably, The Guardian who had been showing "refugee" Kiddie pictures daily suddenly declared showing photos of the Calais "children" landing in the UK would be contrary to their human rights.
  5. You keep posting The Guardian and BBC as if they were credible sources. Those of us not having a vested interest in the Left's narrative being propogated see them as what they are, dishonest, disingenuous Left wing propaganda that lies by omission and distortion to create a false narrative. NYT likewise. If you want to make a point you have to post credible sources.
  6. Medical certificates didn't get wet despite most refugees documents being lost/destroyed that way despite their smart phones not being affected.
  7. I'd say the chances are a lot less than the chance you just made it up for pro economic/refugee propaganda purposes - but feel free to rub us cynics noses in it - shouldn't be hard bearing in mind they are your neighbours and obviously such nice people who would be delighted to show a positive face to Merkels immigration disaster - maybe a picture of them standing in front of the hospital holding up their permission to stay and their medical certificates. Secondly, while qualifying as a Doctor doesn't obligate you to stay in a war zone most do. I would have thought Syrian speaking ICU Doctors would be needed in Syria right now. When European cities were bombed heavily the Doctors didn't run off to work on hospitals in a safe country, they stayed and did what only Doctors can do.
  8. It seems strange that if they were genuine refugees they would seek to enter Australia by boat.
  9. This term is not meant to include those seeking to upgrade their country of residence.
  10. I don't subscribe to your fantasies that there is a "refugee crisis".
  11. The only trouble is that people who are sympathetic to genuine refugees have been lied to by propaganda from the pro immigration politicians and those who benefit from immigration, or are we to believe that they lied last time for their own benefit but are telling the truth this time? In plain English, nobody else believes the <deleted> you believe.
  12. Some may be - Pakistani Christians are legitimately fleeing persecution IMO, but when the Austrian authorities rejected 2000 people in one day for having fake Syrian documents you realise many are coattailing on sympathy for the genuine refugee.
  13. Refugees from what? War, persecution or just from a country with less prospects than the UK?
  14. Again, think it possible you are being played for a fool by schemers who have got it all worked out.
  15. They are fleeing war torn France - there is something akin to the Dunkirk evacuation going on? No? then they are economic migrants. Did you believe it last time when there were 6 flights a week from Stockhom to Baghdad for people fleeing persecution in Iraq to go back once they had lodged their claim with the Swedish authorities? Think it possible you are being played for a fool by schemers who have got it all worked out.
×
×
  • Create New...