Jump to content

DNPBC0

Member
  • Posts

    328
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by DNPBC0

  1. ...... dust particles and pollutants from vehicle exhausts. Outdoor air pollution is now recognised as a major cause of lung cancer with even intermediate levels of air pollution carrying the same risk as passive smoking:

    http://www.iarc.fr/en/media-centre/pr/2013/pdfs/pr221_Q&A.pdf

    What are you saying? That the source of pollution is from the heavy industry located in Issarn, and its supporting heavy transportation system?

    No, I did not say that. What I did say was dust particles are not the only constituents of smog and that outdoor air pollution is dangerous.

  2. It is now over 6 hrs since Thai PBS posted this report, apparently based on information information supplied by the Thai Meteorological Bureau yet their website still gives no indication of the predicted weather change so I sent Thai PBS this message:

    "Just over 6hrs ago you posted the report of a major imminent weather change, apparently based on information supplied by the Thai Meteorological Bureau. The Bureau's website still provides no indication of this weather change. How can you explain this?"

  3. While in no way disagreeing with the harmful effects of breathing atmospheric particulate matter produced by burn-offs, there is another potentially serious open air pollutant which seems to go unmentioned and for which face-masks are useless. This is ground level ozone, a gas which is generated when pollutants emitted, for example, by motor vehicles, power stations, and various industrial plants react with sunlight. In other parts of the world, vehicle exhausts are seen as a major source of the chemicals from which ozone is produced by sunlight, and ground-level ozone is therefore particular problem in urban areas. Breathing ozone is very far from harmless, especially in children and those already suffering from respiratory conditions such as asthma. The gas also appears to cause long-term lung damage even in those who have no immediate symptoms of its effects.

    For further information, see: http://www.epa.gov/groundlevelozone/resources.html

    • Like 1
  4. Mr PM (or anyone here),

    What is it about the AEC next year that means Thais will need better English?

    Mr Macanello (and anyone else here),

    What change in the AEC will means that Thais get a shock? In what way will this happen and what specific rule or change will create the shock?

    FYI - I have heard that the PM speaks English very well - but as a cautious individual, he does not want to make a mistake in public so chooses to use translators. Many of us do the same in business meetings where Thai is spoken I guess.

    Rightly or wrongly, ASEAN has already decided that English is to be the official working language of the ASEAN Economic Community (AEC) when it is formally established towards the end of 2015, Whether or not Prayuth understands and speaks English well is somewhat irrelevant unless it is his intention to be the sole communicant with the AEC. Perhaps it is - who knows?

  5. It's not his business to be pointing fingers in Thailand. He is holding Thailand to an EU standard which in an idealistic utopian world is fine, but the real world is simplistic. And it's a bit foolhardy during a coup.

    Actually, the standard is very clearly provided in the UN Universal Declaration of Human Rights and the International Covenant on Human and Political Rights. As a member of the UN and a ratified signatory to the Covernant, Thailand has international obligations. If it is unable to comply with these, especially in the light the recent coup, then it is perfectly free to leave the UN - and the same goes for all the many other UN members and signatories who are in breach of their international agreements. The suggestion that the UN standards apply only to an idealistic utopian world may well be correct, but unless we are all prepared to accept universal hypocrisy (currently wearing the euphemistic disguise of 'realism'), the only appropriate responses are either to promote amendments to the Declaration and any of the subsequent covenants or to bite the bullet and cancel membership of the UN.

    Now, of course, you might argue that there is no universal morality against hypocrisy and deceit - anything goes because of different cultural values and beliefs. So, why in Thailand is there the objection to any particular breach of promises and clearly stated commitments? In Thailand the answer seems to be clearly stated in the eight-fold path of Buddhism. If the junta chooses to ignore the dharma, then it must explain its reasons for this. If Buddhism is not the basis or Thai morality what is? In Thailand, what exactly is the moral justification for breaking formally agreed commitments?

    • Like 2
  6. "Nonetheless, the prices of Jasmine rice are expected to decrease due to a large production output. Besides, Thai Jasmine rice prices remain relatively higher than those of other countries, which would lead to lower exports. For this reason, prices of Jasmine are set to drop slightly, indicated the Association President."

     

    Like a number of the previous posters, I am confused by the logic of the reason for an anticipated rise in the cost of rice (other than Jasmine rice) for Thai consumers. We have all been led to believe that there is a vast amount of stockpiled rice which no-one outside Thailand wants to buy. The quality of this stockpile is likely to be continually degrading, and its size disappearing due to theft. If it cannot be exported at the present asking price, surely either the export price should be reduced to a level which will be purchased outside Thailand or the product should be  released for sale in Thailand at a price which is at least equivalent to the maximum price which could currently be realistically achieved by exporting it. The point at issue is that, if that price is lower than the actual current prices, someone is 'making a killing' at the expense of Thai consumers.

  7. It seems like a very sensible decision to me. At this stage this is no specific reason to hold a rally. That, of course, may very well change when the Constitution Court delivers its decision. If the consequence of that is the removal of the Caretaker PM, then we shall all be able to hazard a more informed opinion about the possibly dwindling support for the UDD.

    • Like 1
×
×
  • Create New...