Jump to content


  • Content Count

  • Joined

  • Last visited

Community Reputation

282 Excellent

About SymS

  • Rank
    Senior Member

Previous Fields

  • Location
    Chiang Mai

Contact Methods

  • Website URL
  • ICQ

Recent Profile Visitors

3,586 profile views
  1. Oops. I actually agree... I meant "than rail" instead of "by rail"... So the pipeline should be cheaper and safer.
  2. If they don't use the pipeline, they'll use rail to transport the oil. Is that better? I don't just know, but I've read it's cheaper and safer by rail. But I'm not working in the oil industry so what do I know. If the pipeline was not started, then it may make sense to cancel it. But if significant work was done, which appears to be the case at least on the Canadian side, then all that would be wasted.
  • Create New...