Jump to content

SpaceKadet

Advanced Member
  • Posts

    1231
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by SpaceKadet

  1. I think it's the environment you're you're in that let's you be more fluent in the local language, or not.

     

    I spent over 30 years of my life in the Middle East, on and off, but because everybody in the company I was working for spoke fluent English, and the fact that all merchants you had to deal with also spoke fluent English makes you less prone to have a need to pick up a local lingo.

    In retrospect, I wish I had more that just very basic knowledge of Arabic. Would perhaps make it easier in those few tight spots I found myself in.

     

    The same goes for Thailand. Wife speaks fluent English, her family doesn't, but we don't socialize that much. I don't socialize at all with other Thais, apart from the necessary interactions like hospitals and merchant interaction where I can use my limited Thai. If I was living alone, perhaps in a larger city I would have no choice but to pick up more Thai. 

     

    Don't socialize with western expats either. What I have seen, they like to group together in their little social expat ghettos, and have no need to learn local language.

     

    • Like 1
    • Haha 1
  2. 3 hours ago, BusNo8 said:

     

     

     

    I'm tired of carrying two pair and constantly juggling between them. My short is 2.75 now and long 1-1.+

    Perfect case for varifocals!

     

    I don't carry the computer glasses with me. Just switch to the them when I am going to work on the computer for longer.

    Varifocals are fine for occasional use on laptop and phone.

    • Thanks 1
  3. Just now, JBChiangRai said:


    And yet Pink Hydrogen is not in the analysts forecasts.

     

    I agree with you though.

     

     

     

    Not in the McKinsey report you're linking. But many other sources talk of using nuclear exclusively in the future hydrogen production. 

     

    In fact, the stigma of using nuclear power is slowly fading and we see more acceptance for nuclear from the general public.

    The biggest obstacle to a larger deployment of nuclear is, IMO, current legislation, which centers on dinosaur size NPPs with capacities of several TWe, building cycles of 20-30 years, billions of $ in cost, and high maintenance in it's relatively short lifespan. Not to mention costs associated with waste storage.

  4. 5 hours ago, JBChiangRai said:

     

    McKinsey & Co. see Hydrogen being involved in transport for long haul operations accelerating in 2040, in their recent Hydrogen Outlook report they talk about how it will be produced.  Pink Hydrogen (Nuclear) doesn't figure in their forecasts at all, it is almost exclusively expected to be green hydrogen produced through electrolysis of water.

     

    You begin with electricity and after 80% losses it's turning the motor in your car, lots of investment will never bring this below 50% losses and it is for that reason that BEV's will be the premium product, they will cost between 20%-50% per mile to fuel.

     

    Pink Hydrogen is prohibitively expensive.

     

    Global Energy Perspective 2023: Hydrogen outlook | McKinsey

     

    Electrolysis is a very inefficient way to produce hydrogen. Nuclear hydrogen generators use thermochemical technologies, which only requires heat, or hybrid technologies such as the high temperature steam electrolysis (HTSE) and hybrid thermochemical cycles, which require both heat and electricity.. And the nuclear reactors, especially Gen IV, generate that in abundance.

  5. On 3/30/2024 at 1:19 PM, newbee2022 said:

    To be honest I have to admit not being physically able to dig that hole. But I'm very curious to watch how you do that🤗

    Being smart, and if really needing an SMR, I would just contract the digging of the hole to a company with proper equipment for that task. 😎

  6. 18 hours ago, newbee2022 said:

    Ready next year😂😂😂🤗🤗🤗🤣🤣🤣. Sorry,Sir, fool's day's in 3 days time. 🥳

    Yes, next year!

     

    To give an example; Toshiba 4S with the capacity of up to 50MWe needs a 30m deep by 4m wide hole in the ground to house the complete reactor and some small(ish) external building to house the electric generators and any other equipment you might want, like water desalination and hydrogen generator. Passive safety, no maintenance, no operators. Lifespan; 30 years. Don't tell me you can't dig a 30m hole in one year...  

    https://newenergyandfuel.com/http:/newenergyandfuel/com/2009/11/05/here-come-the-japanese-nuclear-reactors/

    • Thumbs Up 1
    • Haha 1
  7. I don't think many here watched the video before posting.

     

    Thailand is talking of deploying SMR's, which are typically 10-100 MVe, not some huge TWe monstrosity that takes 20 years to build.

    SMR's can be deployed in a standard size container. They are fully build at a factory, and after deployment do not require maintenance or re-fueling for 20-30 years, also have much lower security requirements. Once the fuel is spent, they can just be replaced with another unit, and the old one goes back to the factory to be rebuilt.

    IMO, SMR is the way to go with nuclear deployment.

     

    Currently, there is much scaremongering by the green/leftists about the nuclear power. Most of it from people that do not even know how to spell "nuclear".

     

    • Confused 1
    • Thanks 1
    • Agree 1
  8. 5 hours ago, expat_4_life said:


    Nobody wants advanced tech falling into China hands.  Of course the naive high tech moguls that have moved their production to China and elsewhere (chips, phones, etc) have fallen victim to the lure of low cost production though it seems they did not think about the long term consequences.

    How long do you think the domestic Swedish defense industry will last, now that they have become a NATO member?  Is the Gripen destined to become a relic of days past as NATO countries (Sweden just joined) slowly and inexorably get pushed to buy US military equipment?  F-35s anyone?
     

    Well, for starters, JAS39 is currently absolutely the best Gen4 multirole fighter jet. The jet turn around time, fully refueled and rearmed is under 15 minutes. Compare that with over 2 hours for F-16, which also requires proper airfields and highly trained technical staff. And I have no doubt that the Swedish defense industry will last, even with NATO membership, just like German, French and UK, just to mention a few. The biggest obstacle is the Swedish government, which need to approve every wartech export.

     

    In fact, just look at what Swedish wartech offerings are, just state of the art stuff!!! And, BTW, that Swedish sub did "sink" USS Ronald Regan three times during naval war games. https://interestingengineering.com/innovation/tiny-swedish-sub-took-down-an-entire-us-aircraft-carrier

     

    Also, F-35 is just overblown piece of donkeys droppings. USAF should have kept F-22, as they should have kept Comanche helicopter.

    • Agree 1
  9. 56 minutes ago, Pib said:

     

    Did some googling...apparently a common method to rate data center IT capacity is  power consumption.

    https://datacenterhawk.com/resources/hawkpodcast/how-to-measure-the-data-center-market-data-center-fundamentals

    Measuring Data Center Market Supply

    Let's map this to the data center industry.

    On the supply side of the data center market, the lemonade stands are data centers. The family that runs one or more lemonade stands are data center providers or operators. Instead of selling lemonade, data center providers sell capacity. Instead of measuring in cups, the primary measure of capacity is electricity consumption, specifically kilowatts (kW) and megawatts (MW).

    Yeah, so it's just like breweries.

×
×
  • Create New...