Jump to content
BANGKOK 20 April 2019 23:13

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

webfact

Thanks for the memories - tearful sacked tourism minister goes online after PM boots her out

Recommended Posts

If she is so good, why did Australia beat Thailand in the soccer?


Nobody is that bad - maybe the clue is in the match fixing scandal currently brewing.


Sent from my iPad using Thailand Forum - Thaivisa mobile app

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 11/27/2017 at 2:17 PM, webfact said:

The letter is full of self-praise for the wonderful job she did during her three years at the helm.

 

Late last week she was in floods of tears

appears self-delusionally dramatic

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Minister for Tourism right, my 90 visa run returning to Suvarnabhumi airport on Monday Nov 27 at 3:30 pm.

 

Glad the PM got my complaint about this ridiculous immigration queue and replaced her; 1 & 1/2 hours of my life I will never get back.

 

With all due respect to the PM promoting Thailand 4.0, I think the more urgent need is for him to fix Thailand's 1.0 services, they are so broke, this immigration queuing issue has become " ubiquitous ".  

 

 

 5a1e38d31f9ef_SuvarnabhumiAirport(BKK)-ImmiigrationQueue.png.e14546baca54a1a4e5752a2b4e9672d2.png

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

For once I'd like to see a sacked politicians flip the bird and proudly say "<oh yeah very deleted> you all". Too honest, I know.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
21 minutes ago, elgenon said:

You mean the sex industry in Pattaya won't be shut down after all? 

Your relief is palpable.....:thumbsup:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
21 hours ago, Just Weird said:

He was talking about asking the question in relation to alleged evidence of false tourism figures provided by Brits who had holidayed here.  He wasn't suggesting that they were asked about their holiday!

"Just ask most Brits back home these days about a holiday here and what do they say, You must be joking."

 

To me, that comment has nothing at all to do with "alleged evidence of false tourist figures". It is simply a statement that says:-  "if you ask most Brits .............. oh, never mind! 

 

Sorry, wakeupplease, I believe this guy is twisting your words to suit his agenda. I did try, maybe you might be able to do a better job!

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 hours ago, sambum said:

"Just ask most Brits back home these days about a holiday here and what do they say, You must be joking."

 

To me, that comment has nothing at all to do with "alleged evidence of false tourist figures". It is simply a statement that says:-  "if you ask most Brits .............. oh, never mind! 

 

Sorry, wakeupplease, I believe this guy is twisting your words to suit his agenda. I did try, maybe you might be able to do a better job!

 

This thread deteriorated into a discussion about visitor numbers so what else could it reasonably have been about?

 

There's another "agenda" accusation, the other bloke couldn't explain what he meant by the comment you repeated, maybe you can explain to me what my agenda is as you so sagely see it?  I doubt it, though.

 

I'm pretty sure that wakeupplease doesn't need your assistance with anything.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
8 minutes ago, Just Weird said:

This thread deteriorated into a discussion about visitor numbers so what else could it reasonably have been about?

 

There's another "agenda" accusation, the other bloke couldn't explain what he meant by the comment you repeated, maybe you can explain to me what my agenda is as you so sagely see it?  I doubt it, though.

 

I'm pretty sure that wakeupplease doesn't need your assistance with anything.

I think that you are being deliberately obtuse - the comment that was made clearly meant that if you asked most Brits back home if they would want to have a holiday in Thailand, they would not be interested, did not want to know, "not on your nellie",  no thank you, no chance etc etc etc.

 

The thread had not deteriorated into a discussion about tourist numbers - that's just the way you see it - your agenda, if you like. Other things were discussed  about the  woman's lack of results in many areas - not just about tourist numbers, not about people who have already had a holiday in Thailand, as you misread it, but merely a comment that "if you asked most Brits back home ..................."  Oh, I give up! As a couple of other posters have done, so you can get back to your tourist numbers - true or false. P.S. I don't want or need a reply, as I now consider this discourse :mfr_closed1:

 

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, Just Weird said:

This thread deteriorated into a discussion about visitor numbers so what else could it reasonably have been about?

 

There's another "agenda" accusation, the other bloke couldn't explain what he meant by the comment you repeated, maybe you can explain to me what my agenda is as you so sagely see it?  I doubt it, though.

 

I'm pretty sure that wakeupplease doesn't need your assistance with anything.

I guess u agenda here is to trigger us to make the thread longer by making smarty ass comments such as victim blaming etc.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, sambum said:

I think that you are being deliberately obtuse - the comment that was made clearly meant that if you asked most Brits back home if they would want to have a holiday in Thailand, they would not be interested, did not want to know, "not on your nellie",  no thank you, no chance etc etc etc.

 

The thread had not deteriorated into a discussion about tourist numbers - that's just the way you see it - your agenda, if you like. Other things were discussed  about the  woman's lack of results in many areas - not just about tourist numbers, not about people who have already had a holiday in Thailand, as you misread it, but merely a comment that "if you asked most Brits back home ..................."  Oh, I give up! As a couple of other posters have done, so you can get back to your tourist numbers - true or false. P.S. I don't want or need a reply, as I now consider this discourse :mfr_closed1:

 

You don't get to decide whether I reply to a comment that you make to me, regardless of whether you consider it closed!

 

"I think that you are being deliberately obtuse..."

I'm being deliberately accurate, shame others can't do the same.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
35 minutes ago, Destiny1990 said:

I guess u agenda here is to trigger us to make the thread longer by making smarty ass comments such as victim blaming etc.

Now my opinions are "smarty ass comments" but yours don't fall into that category also?  Which victims am I blaming, and for what?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
35 minutes ago, Just Weird said:

You don't get to decide whether I reply to a comment that you make to me, regardless of whether you consider it closed!

 

"I think that you are being deliberately obtuse..."

I'm being deliberately accurate, shame others can't do the same.

I just knew you couldn't resist!

By the way, nothing to do with being deliberately accurate :cheesy: 

 

ob·tuse

əbˈt(y)o͞os,äbˈt(y)o͞os/

adjective

1.

annoyingly insensitive or slow to understand.

synonyms:stupid, slow-witted, slow, dull-witted, unintelligent, ignorant, simpleminded, witless;

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...