US government shutdown after Congress fails to vote

[webfact]

US government shutdown after Congress fails to vote

 

 

The US government has shut down after Congress failed to pass a key budgetary measure on time.

 

Lawmakers had hoped to approve a new spending bill before federal funding expired at midnight (05:00 GMT).

 

But Republican Senator Rand Paul ended hopes for a quick vote when he demanded a debate in the chamber on his amendment to maintain spending caps.

 

Full story: http://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-42999286

 

-- © Copyright BBC 2018-02-09

[webfact]

U.S. federal shutdown at hand after fiscal hawk's dissent

By Amanda Becker, David Morgan and Richard Cowan

 

People walk by the U.S. Capitol building in Washington, U.S., February 8, 2018. REUTERS/ Leah Millis

 

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - The U.S. government staggered into another shutdown on Thursday night after an outspoken fiscal conservative in the Senate singlehandedly delayed action by Congress on a stopgap funding bill wrapped up in a massive budget deal.

 

At midnight on Thursday, funding authority for most federal agencies expired without any intervening action by Congress.

 

Missing the midnight deadline technically triggered a shutdown, but it could be brief. The Senate was expected to approve the stopgap bill and budget deal after 1 a.m. and send it to the House of Representatives. Lawmakers in that chamber were deeply divided along party line and passage was uncertain.

 

But House Republican leaders said the package would be approved, possibly before the start of the work day. If it is, there would be no practical interruption in federal government business. If it is not, the result would be an actual shutdown, the second of 2018, after a three-day shutdown in January.

 

The midnight deadline was missed because of a nine-hour, on-again, off-again Senate floor speech by Senator Rand Paul, who objected to $300 billion in deficit spending in the bill.

 

The unexpected turn of events in the Senate underscored the persistent inability of the Republican-controlled Congress and Republican President Donald Trump to deal effectively with Washington's most basic fiscal obligations.

 

The White House's Office of Management and Budget said earlier in the evening it was preparing for a shutdown if the stopgap bill did not win passage on time in Congress.

 

"The Office of Management and Budget is currently preparing for a lapse in appropriations," an OMB official said.

 

The U.S. Office of Personnel Management sent an email to federal government employees at 12:06 a.m. citing the expiry of funding and advising them to consult their agencies "for guidance on reporting for duty."

 

"LOOT THE TREASURY"

 

Paul, a Kentucky Republican, said the overall budget bill that includes the stopgap measure would "loot the Treasury."

 

"The reason I'm here tonight is to put people on the spot. I want them to feel uncomfortable," he said.

 

The Senate-crafted bill, backed by Trump, although he played little role in its drafting, would end for many months, at least beyond November's midterm congressional elections, the fiscal policy squabbling that has consumed Congress for months.

 

But it would be costly to U.S. taxpayers and would further underscore a fundamental shift in Republican thinking that Paul was trying to draw attention to.

 

Once known as the party of fiscal conservatism, the Republicans and Trump approved a sweeping tax overhaul bill in December that will add an estimated $1.5 trillion to the national debt over 10 years.

 

The new budget bill would raise military and domestic spending by almost $300 billion over the next two years. With no offsets in the form of other spending cuts or new tax revenues, that additional spending would be financed by borrowed money.

 

"I ran for office because I was very critical of President Obama's trillion-dollar deficits," Paul said.

 

"Now we have Republicans hand in hand with Democrats offering us trillion-dollar deficits. I can't...in good faith, just look the other way because my party is now complicit in the deficits. Really who is to blame? Both parties," he said.

 

Paul voted for the deficit-financed tax bill in December.

 

DEBT CEILING

 

The budget bill would not only stave off a shutdown, but would extend the government's debt ceiling until March 2019.

 

That step alone would help reduce uncertainty in U.S. financial markets at a turbulent time. Stocks plunged on Thursday on heavy volume, throwing off course a nearly nine-year bull run. The S&P 500 slumped 3.8 percent.

 

The bill is opposed by House Democratic leader Nancy Pelosi because Republican House leaders will not guarantee her that they will allow a debate later on about taking steps to protect about 700,000 "Dreamer" immigrants from deportation.

 

The young people were brought illegally to the country as children years ago, mostly from Mexico.

 

Trump said last September he would end by March 5 a program set up by former Democratic President Barack Obama to protect the Dreamers from deportation, and urged Congress to act before then. Senate Republicans have pledged to hold a separate immigration debate this month.

 

Even without Pelosi, House passage of the budget bill was widely expected, because it includes more money for disaster relief, infrastructure and healthcare, which Democrats favour.

 

House Speaker Paul Ryan, who backs the bill, predicted the Republican-controlled House would pass it. "I think we will," he said in a radio interview. "It's going to need bipartisan support. We are going to deliver our share of support."

 

(Additional reporting by Makini Brice, Katanga Johnson and Doina Chiacu; Writing by Kevin Drawbaugh; Editing by Paul Tait and Clarence Fernandez)

 

-- © Copyright Reuters 2018-02-09

[Bluespunk]

Let the twitter storm and blame game begin. 

 

It will not be long before the great negotiator fires of a wholly self serving diatribe. 

[Becker]

12 minutes ago, Bluespunk said:

Let the twitter storm and blame game begin. 

 

It will not be long before the great negotiator fires of a wholly self serving diatribe. 

It's about 5 hours left until the man-child's Twitter vomiting begins. Could we see a Covfefe post?

[thaibeachlovers]

Is congress completely useless? They've had weeks to sort this and as usual it gets left till the last minute. Apparently a complete waste of space.

http://www.rasmussenreports.com/public_content/politics/mood_of_america/congressional_performance

A new Rasmussen Reports national telephone and online survey finds that just 13% of Likely U.S. Voters now think Congress is doing a good or excellent job.

 

They are so bad at their job that they probably couldn't get a job as a bollard in real life, though I saw a few practicing to be one during the SotU speech.

 

 

[RickTik]

As those who read this probably already know - Congress voted and the government is not shut down.

[Sir Dude]

Far too much drama in the US congress...would be better if they just got down to realistic business instead of banging their own personal drums on everything. Both sides are way too dramatic and full of it plus too much handbag waving going on...drama central. Morons.

[boomerangutang]

3 hours ago, Sir Dude said:

Far too much drama in the US congress...would be better if they just got down to realistic business instead of banging their own personal drums on everything. Both sides are way too dramatic and full of it plus too much handbag waving going on...drama central. Morons.

I usually don't agree with Paul Ryan, but I agree that the fed gov't spends foolishly.  However, it's doubtful he and I agree about which specific should have cut-backs.  Interesting how one person can hold up the whole process.

Fed politicians should do what California state politicians did:   Pass a law which disallows any salaries paid to Congresspeople or president and his staff or any Federal employees (from Secretaries on down) ....until a budget is passed.  They might act with a bit of alacrity if they knew they weren't getting a paycheck.

 

btw: everyone who misses one or more paychecks and/or misses budget allocations for their particular departments, .....will eventually get paid (all arrears) when the budget is passed.  So all this partisan finger-pointing about soldiers not getting paid is BS.  They may be a bit inconvenienced (maybe late on a mortgage payment if they have no savings), but they still get all their meals, lodging, medical, ammunition, and everything else they're used to getting.

[sirineou]

48 minutes ago, boomerangutang said:

I usually don't agree with Paul Ryan, but I agree that the fed gov't spends foolishly.  However, it's doubtful he and I agree about which specific should have cut-backs.

one suggestion I have would be to cut back on military parades , another would be to cut back on the hair coloring budget of the white house.  Or how about Travel to Florida? Trump promised us he would never leave the white house and would work all the time. What happened?

Or just make things simple and cut back on Trump, send him home with a one way ticket.. 

[Basil B]

15 hours ago, webfact said:

But Republican Senator Rand Paul ended hopes for a quick vote when he demanded a debate in the chamber on his amendment to maintain spending caps.

So they can not blame the Democrats this time...

[boomerangutang]

7 hours ago, sirineou said:

Or just make things simple and cut back on Trump, send him home with a one way ticket.. 

A one way ticket for him and his family to Russia ...they would feel more 'at home' there.  Maybe the Russkies can set up a park with large wild vegetarian beast roaming around, so Trump's sons can get up close with high powered rifles and blow their brains out.