Jump to content

"Foreign owners need educating about Buddhist feelings" as Buddha head on beach angers Thais


rooster59

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 191
  • Created
  • Last Reply
31 minutes ago, ChrisY1 said:

So a Chinese Buddha image is different from a Thai Buddha?...How many buddhas are there?

    The fat, sometimes laughing "buddha" is not a representation of Lord Gautama Buddha.  It is actually a representation of Budai... a Chinese monk  who lived in the later Liang time about 907 - 923  C.E./A.D.  Apparently he was from Zhejiang and his Buddhist name was Qieci ("Promise this") .

   People at the time said he was a good and loving monk.  Some people confuse him with Maitreya.  But many westerners mistakingly think the "laughing fat Buddha" is actually a representative of Lord Gautama Buddha.    Nope ! !    

 

By the way.... as far as the number of Buddhas.... there were and are many.  You are a Buddha.... you just don't know it yet, and you may not know it for a very great number of lifetimes to come....   Same with me...... 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

The photo shows one girl of a group of Morlam dancers. The event was on the grounds of the local temple with plenty of drunk people dancing in the temple. I'm not saying that some of them were high on drugs, that would be speculation. 

 

         

 

  

 

   

 

  

Lung Joy's merit.JPG

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The OP doesn't say foreigners in bikinis, it says naked people and a bit more serious accusations of foreigners who mostly live here with full respect of other cultures.

 

From the article, not sanook:  It does not take into account the appropriateness of the culture and traditions of most Buddhist cities. The head of the Buddha is worshiped by the people. Set up outdoor showroom near the beach. This is where naked tourists are often sunbathing in this area.

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The Buddha was famously opposed to bikinis and sand. He has no problem bouncing around on the dashboard of a Bangkok taxi however.

Let me see now...2500 years ago...Sidhartha Gautama...was opposed to Bikinis.....worn by who???.'..did they wear Bikinis???..and Sand??..Goes to show who writes this tripe?

Sent from my HUAWEI LUA-L21 using Thailand Forum - Thaivisa mobile app

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Easy Come Easy Go said:

Exactly, I find it funny how they have a totally skewed 180 degrees view of Buddhism. Buddha would see it for what it is, a lump of stone.. and furthermore that it's empty. 

This reminds me of when I was waiting outside of a 7/11 some years ago, I saw somebody begging outside. It didn't see as if they were getting any luck at all, yet literally 50 feet away there was a Buddhist shrine statue with drinks, water, food and all sorts draped around it. Just goes to show.. 

I'm sure that the vast majority of Thais who claim to be Buddhists have very little idea of what it actually entails. All they have is a vague, often totally wrong, concept. But like in any religion anywhere, most of them are complete hypocrites anyway when it comes to knowing the 'rules' and living by them. I suppose top of the heap are Catholics who can just pop into a box, say sorry about what I've done and the priest says that's okay my son, next please.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, jenny2017 said:

The head of the Buddha is worshiped by the people.

It's not the head of anything it's a lump of concrete.

 

I've seen what extreme religion (worship) can do; naked ladies rolling and writhing about in the mud en-mass to the sound, and beat of the big drum. while others look on chanting.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

When a close friend with a wife and young child decided to leave and take a hallucinogen fuelled trip around the world all and sundry berated him for being a scumbag, lowlife loser. 

 

During his travellers he became very popular to the point of worship by likeminded people.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

"Sanook said that comment online after the post by "Saipars Saipars" was widespread with people suggesting that the owners of the resort must be foreigners who don't know about the feelings of the majority of Thais who are Buddhists."

 

The owners must be foreigners!  Why must they?  Thailand is 95% Buddhist, that still leaves 5% of approximately 67 million people, that's 3.35 million people that could have commited this terrible crime!

 

Perhaps the foreigners can sue these people who made these widespread comments, under the computer crimes act, for tarnishing their reputation with the biggest bullshite comment of the decade.

 

Sanook should know better than to print this crap!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, owl sees all said:

It's not the head of anything it's a lump of concrete.

 

I've seen what extreme religion (worship) can do; naked ladies rolling and writhing about in the mud en-mass to the sound, and beat of the big drum. while others look on chanting.

The sentence is from "Sanook". 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, dotpoom said:

I sometimes wonder about how "outraged" Thai people  seem to get on social media over certain issues...but never appear to vent the same outrage when it is badly needed in a public place where they can actually do something about a bad situation. I am talking about "loud noice" of course and the lifelong damage it can do to children's ears.

   I was at the week long market in the College grounds in Banampur a few days ago. Many families strolling  around with babies in arms and strollers.....when all of a sudden "music" starting blareing out, it was, without exaragation, off the ricktar scale. I have Tinnitus, bad hearing , lived here 18 yrs. so am used to it in Thailand but never ever anything like this. I had to actually leave the market with my hands covering my ears. I asked the wife....why do Thai people never approach the person (DJ in this case) responsible for this racket and ask them to lower it down for the sake of their babie's hearing and the irrepairable damage he is doing to their ears. She just shrugged her shoulers and said "they grow up with it" ..???

The music caused an earthquake????

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, Enoon said:

 

"Many said they should be visited by the authorities to educate them about how inappropriate this was,"

 

Is that what Buddha would have done?

 

Is that what Buddha would suggest they do?

 

It's just a lump of stone folks.........let it go...........detach yourselves.

 

 

As a Buddhist and a Thai I will agree with this logic because Buddhism is actually a way of life more then a religion in its purest form.  Amulets, statues were all created because human nature has evolved these teachings to believe in a power above but need something to represent it.  

 

A lot of people wear crosses as jewelry and it doesn’t necessarily irk ALL Christians, maybe some.   What one person finds offensive another may not so I think its always better to know the norms in each country and respect it for what it is to them without necessarily having to understand or rationalize it because you can’t from a different value perspective.

 

Best is if both sides chill and not make it a big deal but agree to not agree.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

What someone posts on their Facebook feed and how their friends respond to it isn't necessarily news.

 

Thais seem to be undergoing a resurgence of pride in their cultural and national identity. Taking umbrage at perceived cultural offenses, which can on occasion come across as petty and hypocritical, seems to be  part of this trend.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.





×
×
  • Create New...