Jump to content

Air quality is fine in Thailand as Thais say Chinese are exaggerating


webfact

Recommended Posts

Air quality is fine in Thailand as Thais say Chinese are exaggerating

 

1518427718434-960x0.jpg

Picture: Thai News Agency

 

The Department of Pollution control have said that dust in the air is normal for this time of the year and is just the result of still air in the cool season.

 

They have said a Chinese website who claimed it was dangerous have overstated the risks.

 

While admitting that it was a bit unhealthy and that those with respiratory problems might be more at risk, Talerngsak Petchsuwan played down any risks.

 

1518427718414.jpg

Picture: Thai News Agency

 

He said that it was all relatively normal for this time of the year. In 2016-17 the worst point was February - it came earlier in January this year because of the effect of cool season fluctuations.

 

Normal people would not have any problems he said as he criticized the Chinese air quality website "Worldwide Air Quality" for following a US based assessment system that exaggerated the problems.

 

If the Thai system was used it was all quite safe.

 

The Chinese claimed that levels were three times the level of safety of particulate in the air which was overstating the case, said Talerngsak who had plenty of graphs to back up his assertions in the TNA report.

 

Source: Thai News Agency

 
tvn_logo.jpg
-- © Copyright Thai Visa News 2018-02-13
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 108
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Amazing we have to rely on China to get the truth out. Thainess in a nutshell, as real-time data's available for all--journalists too should they choose to look beyond what the government puts out.  Have not seen PM2.5 below 125 in BKK since I started looking last week--and anything above 25 is supposed to be unhealthy, should one accept WHO standards?

Screen Shot 2018-02-13 at 6.42.07 AM.png

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This is the air quality in downtown Bangkok now http://aqicn.org/city/bangkok/

5a82385af1c42_ScreenShot2018-02-13at07_50_35.png.1bbfdd982c050789ecfdf479a416a8e2.png

And this is the air quality in Chiang May now http://aqicn.org/city/chiang-mai/
5a82389579107_ScreenShot2018-02-13at07_59_39.png.28fd25e8a4567c27fe8d4b2fdb946116.png

And this is the air quality in Beijing now http://aqicn.org/city/beijing/

5a8238c0a24c2_ScreenShot2018-02-13at08_00_27.png.b18924797e48b0054661573414c01276.png

The Chinese are NOT lying! Bangkok air has almost three times the PM count and is UNHEALTHY.  GoT needs to take action not ignore facts!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This is very positive, a country like China, upon whom Thailand's tourist industry depends quite heavily, making noises about the poor air quality here, it could be the catalyst to make Thailand take some action. We'll overlook of course the hypocrisy whereby there are some cities in China I wouldn't even enter without a bio-hazard suit but that's another story!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sigh: 

 

1. It's not "The Chinese" who are saying anything.  Chinese tourists are quite happy and indeed conditions in most of China are *FAR* worse than Thailand.  What this article is about is the international air quality site, aqicn.org, which is based in Beijing and has contributors globally. 

 

2. The main good thing about aqicn.org is that it takes data from all over the world, including the Thai-government-supplied data from Thailand, and converts it all to the US EPA AQI Index.  This makes comparisons very easy.

 

3. Thailand has both an older PM10 standard (that's not very strict) as well as a newer PM2.5 based standard that matches the US EPA scale very well and is very strict.   This new standard is not yet used throughout Thailand, also because most measuring stations don't have a PM2.5 capability which would lead to comparing apples and oranges, so they stick with the old standard for now.  However they make the PM2.5 data available in near real-time for anyone who wants to use it, such as indeed aqicn.org, NGO's like Greenpeace (who manage to still compare apples and oranges) and a range of mobile apps.   Note: the Thai government app from the PCD departement only uses PM10: don't use it.)

 

4. The government is correct in saying that conditions are pretty normal.  Note that 'Normal' does not mean 'Healthy'. Not in English and not in Thai.  It means that it's very similar to past years, going back 20 years. 

 

Read up or shut up, and that applies to The Nation as well. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, webfact said:

If the Thai system was used it was all quite safe.

what a foolish man; in the ground-breaking documentary 'Under the Dome' (air quality in China) it was likely the number 1 point that PM 2.5 should be the focus; 

the 'thai system' does not focus on and consistently, across-the-board  report on 2.5;

thus the 'thai system' is inferior

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, webfact said:

dust in the air is normal for this time of the year

why do thais constantly revert to this way-of-thinking ?

the point is not that the dry season is worse than the wet season; that is typical thai 'relative thinking';

the point is whether it is dangerous , 'absolute thinking'

Link to comment
Share on other sites

To busy spending billions on bullet trains that only the rich can afford to ride, but no money to put scrubbers on coal fire power plant smoke stacks, or money to clean up the air. But the government as stated will tell you the air is the cleanest/best in the world, that is why 50K people die from respiratory  problems in Bangkok every year. Just drive behind one of those dump trucks spewing out tons of black soot/smoke. Yeah that is clean/ air.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.





×
×
  • Create New...