Jump to content
BANGKOK 24 March 2019 12:49
Jonathan Fairfield

Forum to discuss same-sex marriage

Recommended Posts

5 minutes ago, Basil B said:

My view too... I know many will disagree with me but I do not think it is right.

 

It is of no benefit to a child only gratification for same sex couples... 

Yeah, sure, better to be kicked around foster homes without loving parents. 

 

 

 

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
12 hours ago, Basil B said:

It is of no benefit to a child only gratification for same sex couples... 

These couples have the same maternal/paternal instincts you have... Don’t let your willfully ignorant prejudice turn them all into Joan Crawford... :coffee1:

Edited by sfokevin
  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

When someone’s argument starts with “I don’t think it’s right”... The rest of the argument usually consists of poorly footnoted religious dogma or willfully ignorant prejudice...

Edited by sfokevin
  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
10 hours ago, sfokevin said:

When someone’s argument starts with “I don’t think it’s right”... The rest of the argument usually consists of poorly footnoted religious dogma or willfully ignorant prejudice...

...whereas posts littered with such phrases as  'argument, bigotry, ignorance, tolerance, prejudice , homophobe, straight' etc are perfectly ok... providing they have the desired effect ?

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
17 minutes ago, evadgib said:

...whereas posts littered with such phrases as  'argument, bigotry, ignorance, tolerance, prejudice , homophobe, straight' etc are perfectly ok... providing they have the desired effect ?

Huh?

None of those are phrases.

All of them are single WORDS.

Your lame attempt at some kind of point is thus totally absurd. 

To add, there is nothing at all wrong with ANY of those words. 

They're just words. None of them are slurs. Come back when you have a coherent thought. 

  • Thanks 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, Jingthing said:

Huh?

None of those are phrases.

All of them are single WORDS.

Your lame attempt at some kind of point is thus totally absurd. 

To add, there is nothing at all wrong with ANY of those words. 

They're just words. None of them are slurs. Come back when you have a coherent thought. 

Was my grammar OK?

  • Haha 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, evadgib said:

Was my grammar OK?

Irrelevant. 

  • Haha 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 7/8/2018 at 6:22 PM, duanebigsby said:

Just admit you are anti-gay so everyone can just take you from your word.

not a  bad response until the end where ya ferked it  all up

  • Haha 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 7/9/2018 at 12:45 PM, sfokevin said:

Having two committed people raising a child is really all that is needed...

whats wrong with one or three  then???

Why cant I have two wives/husbands whats so wrong with that? NOTHING

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 7/8/2018 at 4:50 PM, Julie H said:

as i have known many homophobes that have been forced to conform with public opinion in recent years 

nice? .........cant beat a  bit of "forcing"

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, Jingthing said:

Don't conflate different issues.

Sent from my Lenovo A7020a48 using Thailand Forum - Thaivisa mobile app
 

ill conflate what I like thanks

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, kannot said:

whats wrong with one or three  then???

Why cant I have two wives/husbands whats so wrong with that? NOTHING

This absurd rabbit hole argument failed before in the same sax marriage debate...

Again try using facts and common sense in this debate... :coffee1:

  • Thanks 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
7 hours ago, evadgib said:

...whereas posts littered with such phrases as  'argument, bigotry, ignorance, tolerance, prejudice , homophobe, straight' etc are perfectly ok... providing they have the desired effect ?

I assume you are objecting to my use of the phrase "willful ignorant prejudice" in describing someones actions?... You seem to consider this unfair... I note you do not arguing that I used the phrase incorrectly... Again try arguing the facts...

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
30 minutes ago, sfokevin said:

This absurd rabbit hole argument failed before in the same sax marriage debate...

Again try using facts and common sense in this debate... :coffee1:

What you do with your musical instruments is  your business

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...