Jump to content
BANGKOK 24 January 2019 11:14

UK PM May's government loses contempt vote over Brexit legal advice

Recommended Posts

UK PM May's government loses contempt vote over Brexit legal advice

By Kylie MacLellan



Britain's Prime Minister Theresa May leaves 10 Downing Street, London, Britain, December 4, 2018. REUTERS/Henry Nicholls


LONDON (Reuters) - British Prime Minister Theresa May's government was found in contempt of parliament on Tuesday for refusing to release its full legal advice on Brexit, underlining the depth of opposition among lawmakers to her deal on leaving the European Union.


The row threatened to overshadow the start of five days of debate in parliament on May's Brexit deal ahead of a crucial vote on Dec. 11, when lawmakers will be asked to approve it.


Opposition parties and the small Northern Irish party that props up May's minority government are furious that it only provided an outline of the legal basis for its Brexit deal after parliament voted to be given the full advice.


They put forward a motion, which was backed by 311-293 in a vote on Tuesday, that found ministers in contempt of parliament and ordered the immediate publication of the advice.


"Today's finding of contempt is a badge of shame for this government. It is of huge constitutional and political significance," Keir Starmer, the opposition Labour Party's Brexit spokesman, said after the vote. "Never before has the House of Commons found ministers in contempt of parliament."


The sanctions ultimately available include suspending a lawmaker, most likely Attorney General Geoffrey Cox. It was not clear whether the opposition parties would now push for that.


Such punishment is usually reserved for backbench lawmakers guilty of individual wrongdoing. In reality, Tuesday's vote was about putting pressure on a weakened government.


Catherine Haddon, senior fellow at the Institute for Government, said the opposition wanted to use "every opportunity they have to show the instability of the government".


The small Northern Irish party, the Democratic Unionists, which props up May's minority government, joined opposition parties in voting against the government on the contempt issue.


So many lawmakers - from May's own Conservatives as well as from the opposition parties - have spoken out against the deal that the odds look stacked against her winning the Dec. 11 vote.


Haddon said the contempt motion was a "show of force" which could foreshadow both the final vote on the deal and the various amendments lawmakers are trying to attach to it.


Cox gave parliament an outline of his legal advice to the government on Monday.


Andrea Leadsom, Leader of the House of Commons, said on Tuesday that this had been a "full and frank exposition", and that releasing the full advice would set a dangerous precedent.


She said the government, which had sought to slow down the process by referring the issue to parliament's Committee of Privileges, had fulfilled the spirit of the order to publish.


The government said after the vote that it would now publish the full advice.


(Additional reporting by Elizabeth Piper and William James; editing by Guy Faulconbridge and Gareth Jones)

-- © Copyright Reuters 2018-12-05
  • Haha 1

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites
3 hours ago, NanLaew said:

But beyond all this hair-on-fire rhetoric, what do we want to see as the ultimate goal here?


Vote of No-Confidence followed by General Election.


EU will (at least) suspend departure process until the UK gets its house in order.



Edited by Enoon
  • Like 2

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, vogie said:

Spin it as much as you like chomper, the majority of the British Electorate voted for brexit, I know you are not big on democrasy, what suits chomp, but I agree with you on the lies.





The majority, by a very small margin, of those that voted, chose to vote for Brexit in what was legally established as an advisory referendum.


A crock of <deleted>, created by Cameron and his cronies. And rather than acknowledging and addressing that, the politicians will as usual make it a worse, bigger and fouler crock of <deleted>. After all, they will still be well off, with nice pensions,  no enforced retirement, and living the good life. And screw the people and country they're supposed to serve.

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.