Jump to content

Report: Successful retirement extension using monthly income, no consul letter


Recommended Posts

16 minutes ago, JackThompson said:

The rules never stated one had to "spend 65K+ / mo every month" to qualify for a retirement-extension.

And the rules as yet have not stated that it is not OK to repatriate funds but the rules are now only a few weeks old.

 

You're saying maybe that the IMM folks will continue to allow someone to deposit from overseas 65K baht in a Thai bank account and 5 minutes after it clears send the whole 65K baht minus expenses back from where it came. Even with the 800K  baht in the bank you still have to have funds in addition to the 800K baht or you won't be able to top it off for the following year.

Edited by JLCrab
Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 hours ago, DogNo1 said:

Fidelity does free Swift transfers and Mapguy says that USAA does also.  I haven't been able to confirm that with USAA yet.  They charged me $45, perhaps improperly.  What I know is free with USAA is domestic transfers but that option goes away on April 1st with Bangkok Bank's policy of only accepting IAT transfers after that.  Bangkok Bank says that after that date, ordinary ACH transfers will be returned.

USAA does charge $45.  Interestingly, on its website now (if you look up "international wire transfers"), it actually recommends Transferwise, as being cheaper. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, JLCrab said:

And the rules as yet have not stated that it is not OK to repatriate funds but the rules are now only a few weeks old.

 

You're saying maybe that the IMM folks will continue to allow someone to deposit from overseas 65K baht in a Thai bank account and 5 minutes after it clears send the whole 65K baht minus expenses back from where it came. Even with the 800K  baht in the bank you still have to have funds in addition to the 800K baht or you won't be able to top it off for the following year.

If you want to send some funds back...withdraw cash ...

 

Pay it into a different account ..yours or your wifes etc ...

 

Get 'whoever' to send it back using TW ... to your account...or do something like this...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

45 minutes ago, JAS21 said:

If you want to send some funds back...withdraw cash ...

Pay it into a different account ..yours or your wifes etc ...

Get 'whoever' to send it back using TW ... to your account...or do something like this...

Why the devious route -- if it's perfectly OK why not just send it back directly from YOUR Thailand account to YOUR ex-Thailand  account?

  • Confused 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, scubascuba3 said:
54 minutes ago, JLCrab said:
Why the devious route -- if it's perfectly OK why not just send it back directly from YOUR Thailand account to YOUR ex-Thailand  account?

Sounds like its better to go via dee money first

Sure so your Thai bank statement shows that you transferred money to DEE Money for transfer out of Thailand.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 1/16/2019 at 6:16 PM, DogNo1 said:

Fidelity does free Swift transfers and Mapguy says that USAA does also.  I haven't been able to confirm that with USAA yet.  They charged me $45, perhaps improperly.  What I know is free with USAA is domestic transfers but that option goes away on April 1st with Bangkok Bank's policy of only accepting IAT transfers after that.  Bangkok Bank says that after that date, ordinary ACH transfers will be returned.

 

From USAA website.  $20 for a domestic wire and $45 for an international wire.

image.png.65d51e57a8c39c01cbe158cde03a021a.png

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, scubascuba3 said:
7 minutes ago, JLCrab said:
Sure so your Thai bank statement shows that you transferred money to DEE Money for transfer out of Thailand.

 

so therefore transfer to your other thai account first.

 

You think the transfer will show the correct code and nthat has been transferred to your account in Thailand back to your account ex-Thailand?ame? 555 keep it real

Why would you feel the need to hide your tracks if there is nothing in the new regs to prohibit your sending money, that has been transferred to your account in Thailand for purposes of extension, back to your account ex-Thailand?

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Why would you feel the need to hide your tracks if there is nothing in the new regs to prohibit your sending money, that has been transferred to your account in Thailand for purposes of extension, back to your account ex-Thailand?
you seem to be worried about using Dee money as if it will incriminate you. I don't see a problem with sending money back to farangland to pay bills. But lets be honest the IOs are loose cannons and a lottery if you get one that follows the rules so best not do anything that gives them an opportunity to ask for tip
Link to comment
Share on other sites

There seems to be nothing in place to prevent anyone from depositing 65K baht from overseas, then withdrawing and converting to either gold or the original currency of origin at a money exchange. What am I missing?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The best way to "send" THB back to your home account is to find a trusted countryman who doesn't need to show incoming funds to T/L, e.g. someone using the seasoned 4/800k savings.

Simply agree a FX rate, arrange for him to make a bank transfer in the home country (usually free & immediate) and then hand over the baht cash.  Saves fees in both directions.

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, Lacessit said:

There seems to be nothing in place to prevent anyone from depositing 65K baht from overseas,

Yes -- but when people on here reference it they often suggest a circuitous trail of cash, other accounts, other person's accounts, etc. before sending it back from the Thai bank they use for purposes of the extension and, if it's all legit, why the need to obfuscate?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, JAS21 said:

If you want to send some funds back...withdraw cash ...

 

Pay it into a different account ..yours or your wifes etc ...

 

Get 'whoever' to send it back using TW ... to your account...or do something like this...

TWise cannot do Baht to foreign bank.

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The best way to "send" THB back to your home account is to find a trusted countryman who doesn't need to show incoming funds to T/L, e.g. someone using the seasoned 4/800k savings.
Simply agree a FX rate, arrange for him to make a bank transfer in the home country (usually free & immediate) and then hand over the baht cash.  Saves fees in both directions.
A bit cheap charlie though, who can be bothered with that, plus you may need to do it monthly
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, JLCrab said:

Yes -- but when people on here reference it they often suggest a circuitous trail of cash, other accounts, other person's accounts, etc. before sending it back from the Thai bank they use for purposes of the extension and, if it's all legit, why the need to obfuscate?

If you send all or most of the money back, immigration has a legitimate reason to question how you support yourself. So it's that issue that some people rather wouldn't want to be discussing with immigration, not the (lawful) act of sending back money in itself. Pretty obvious, really.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, Caldera said:

not the (lawful) act of sending back money in itself. Pretty obvious, really.

Fine -- and as it is then lawful to deposit 40/65K baht from overseas into your Thai bank account for purpose of extension and then, seconds later, transfer all of it back to the country of origin, you are presuming that, even if the interpretation of the news regs is that it is lawful today, another interpretation of the new regs might be that that modus operandi might not be lawful?

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, Caldera said:

If you send all or most of the money back, immigration has a legitimate reason to question how you support yourself. So it's that issue that some people rather wouldn't want to be discussing with immigration, not the (lawful) act of sending back money in itself. Pretty obvious, really.

Seriously bad when TI has the right to virtually audit your finances via your personal banking records to facilitate an extension.Anyone that thinks that’s above board and fair game is kidding themselves.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, Caldera said:

If you send all or most of the money back, immigration has a legitimate reason to question how you support yourself. So it's that issue that some people rather wouldn't want to be discussing with immigration, not the (lawful) act of sending back money in itself. Pretty obvious, really.

If you send all of the money back, or some of the money back via Dee money immo' won't have a clue.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, JLCrab said:

Fine -- and as it is then lawful to deposit 40/65K baht from overseas into your Thai bank account for purpose of extension and then, seconds later, transfer all of it back to the country of origin, you are presuming that, even if the interpretation of the news regs is that it is lawful today, another interpretation of the new regs might be that that modus operandi might not be lawful?

 

 

It’s not our MO that’s the worry here!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, scubascuba3 said:

Doesn't seem so, you're quite worried about it for some reason

I'm just intrigued by the bunco artists who think that the new regs say that, as long as the overseas deposit for extension of stay purposes remains in their Thai bank account for a few milliseconds, then they can pull it out send it back to from where it came.

Edited by JLCrab
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, JLCrab said:

I'm just intrigued by the bunco artists who think that the new regs say that, as long as the overseas deposit for extension of stay purposes remains in their Thai bank account for a few milliseconds, then then can pull it out send it back to from where it came.

So am I. I'm wondering why it's worth doing with all the transactional costs back and forth in play. Not to mention any Thai Immigration official looking at a bank record will see what is going on.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, JLCrab said:

I'm just intrigued by the bunco artists who think that the new regs say that, as long as the overseas deposit for extension of stay purposes remains in their Thai bank account for a few milliseconds, then they can pull it out send it back to from where it came.

i think they can.    and will.      dee money. or a friends A/C..  

If that fails use an agent .

Bunco artists will always find a way

TIT

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, wgdanson said:

TWise cannot do Baht to foreign bank.

Yes ...you are correct ... you have to use a more conventional method ...thank you for pointing that out.

 

I wrote the TW article for Thailand Starter Kit but I only compared inward transfers ... woops

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.





×
×
  • Create New...