Jump to content

Brexit bedlam - May's EU divorce deal crushed by 230 votes in parliament


webfact

Recommended Posts

2 minutes ago, melvinmelvin said:

I see, remember now, the Cooper et al fix to Tax/Finance acts - I take it you refer to.

And this legal hack overrules the statute already in place for guiding the exit?

ta

Parliament is in the saddle. Brexiteers always looking backwards. The primary issue here is that Parliament has rumbled the Hard Brexiteer strategy to achieve a default outcome without HB having the parliamentary majority. I repeat: the Hard Brexiteers do not have a parliamentary majority. Any decision, implied, or otherwise will now have to come back to Parliament. Everything now dead in the water.

Link to post
Share on other sites
  • Replies 1.6k
  • Created
  • Last Reply
2 minutes ago, rixalex said:

Circumstances have only changed in the sense that politicians over the last two years, instead of accepting the result and getting on with finding a way to successfully leave the union, have done everything they can to try and prevent us leaving and make it more difficult. None of that is the fault of the 17 plus million who voted to leave and who are still awaiting for the result to be enacted. By allowing another referendum, you'll be potentially rewarding politicians for having acted in the way they did. And to repeat my earlier point, all well and good when it happens to result in the overturning of a decision you didn't agree with in the first place, but wait until the shoe is on the other foot and let's see if you're still as flexible about democracy as you are now.

Sent from my SM-G610F using Thailand Forum - Thaivisa mobile app
 

Your points are well taken. However, as I stated previously, this was never going to be a quick easy exit, and the complexity of it, combined with the misfires by May, the biases in Parliament, and the intervening clarity of the mistake (IMO) means that sometimes older decisions not yet enacted need to be revisited and overturned, and isn't it fair to ask the electorate again? Where is the harm in that. To not do so would be to deny them the benefit of learning from the past two years, and views may have changed. If that 17 million plus voters still feel the same way, let's confirm that, rather than guess at it.

Link to post
Share on other sites
10 minutes ago, melvinmelvin said:

 

I see, remember now, the Cooper et al fix to Tax/Finance acts - I take it you refer to.

 

And this legal hack overrules the statute already in place for guiding the exit?

 

ta

 

 

"There's a big problem facing members of Parliament who want to avoid a no-deal Brexit. They can't just show there is a majority in the House of Commons against no deal - they need to prove there is a majority in favour of an alternative outcome.

That's because leaving the EU - with or without a deal - is currently the default.

If the agreement the prime minister has negotiated with the EU fails to pass the House of Commons, the UK will leave with no deal at all unless something changes, because leaving the EU is written into UK law.

The EU Withdrawal Act sets 29 March as the date of departure."

 

https://www.bbc.com/news/uk-politics-46799778

 

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites
3 minutes ago, SheungWan said:

Parliament is in the saddle. Brexiteers always looking backwards. The primary issue here is that Parliament has rumbled the Hard Brexiteer strategy to achieve a default outcome without HB having the parliamentary majority. I repeat: the Hard Brexiteers do not have a parliamentary majority. Any decision, implied, or otherwise will now have to come back to Parliament. Everything now dead in the water.

right,

and that is the way it should have been all the way, parliament at the tiller

and not the odd PM/cabinet

 

Brexit is too important for that.

 

Alas, it took a very long time for parliament to wake up.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, SheungWan said:

Parliament is in the saddle. Brexiteers always looking backwards. The primary issue here is that Parliament has rumbled the Hard Brexiteer strategy to achieve a default outcome without HB having the parliamentary majority. I repeat: the Hard Brexiteers do not have a parliamentary majority. Any decision, implied, or otherwise will now have to come back to Parliament. Everything now dead in the water.

"Everything now dead in the water."

 

Only if MPs think they can find a way to retain their seats/pretend they are respecting the democratic referendum result.  And they know that rescinding Article 50 is the worst case scenario for them when it comes to the aforementioned.

 

The next week or so is going to be very 'interesting' for the electorate, and very uncomfortable for MPs.

Link to post
Share on other sites
7 minutes ago, dick dasterdly said:

"Everything now dead in the water."

 

Only if MPs think they can find a way to retain their seats/pretend they are respecting the democratic referendum result.  And they know that rescinding Article 50 is the worst case scenario for them when it comes to the aforementioned.

 

The next week or so is going to be very 'interesting' for the electorate, and very uncomfortable for MPs.

What they will do and what they can do are different things.

Link to post
Share on other sites
10 minutes ago, melvinmelvin said:

right,

and that is the way it should have been all the way, parliament at the tiller

and not the odd PM/cabinet

Brexit is too important for that.

Alas, it took a very long time for parliament to wake up.

Well not really. The explanation is as Macmillan might put it (if he did the first time); "Events, dear boy, events"

Link to post
Share on other sites
16 minutes ago, vogie said:

 

"There's a big problem facing members of Parliament who want to avoid a no-deal Brexit. They can't just show there is a majority in the House of Commons against no deal - they need to prove there is a majority in favour of an alternative outcome.

That's because leaving the EU - with or without a deal - is currently the default.

If the agreement the prime minister has negotiated with the EU fails to pass the House of Commons, the UK will leave with no deal at all unless something changes, because leaving the EU is written into UK law.

The EU Withdrawal Act sets 29 March as the date of departure."

 

https://www.bbc.com/news/uk-politics-46799778

The shrinking Brexiteer!

Link to post
Share on other sites
5 minutes ago, SheungWan said:

I see, you don't understand the Parliamentary system re pairing.....And maybe not me as well! https://www.parliament.uk/site-information/glossary/pairing/

Pairing is based on trust...

https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2018/jul/22/jo-swinson-pairing-scandal-matters-our-democracy-relies-on-trust-and-integrity

Link to post
Share on other sites
22 minutes ago, dick dasterdly said:

"Everything now dead in the water."

 

Only if MPs think they can find a way to retain their seats/pretend they are respecting the democratic referendum result.  And they know that rescinding Article 50 is the worst case scenario for them when it comes to the aforementioned.

 

The next week or so is going to be very 'interesting' for the electorate, and very uncomfortable for MPs.

 

14 minutes ago, SheungWan said:

What they will do and what they can do are different things.

I think that is pretty much what I said?

 

Edit - Which is why I pointed out that "Everything now dead in the water." - isn't necessarily true.  MPs are in between a rock and a hard place at the moment.  The vast majority have always wanted to remain - but how to do that without alienating even more of the electorate?

Link to post
Share on other sites
9 hours ago, TopDeadSenter said:

May needs to step down immediately and let a proper leave PM come in and clean up this mess she made. Rees-Mogg, Farage, Robinson, Batten? Somebody that actually believes in Brexit, believes in our country, and has the stones to get on with it. This should have been a very simple process, no excuses for having made a complete dogs dinner of it.

That is completely nonsense. There is already a contract. Easy to sign. 

Also there is a law for a full term 5 years job for May. So a new PM not possible. 

And if such polit-clowns as you mentioned would represent UK I have my doubts. 

The real drama is that from the beginning the govt lied to the people and were not willing to show the consequences of any kind of Brexit. 

So many Brits believed in a land of milk and honey. So do you. 

That you and millions of your kind risk the future of the young ones you never cared of. 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites
40 minutes ago, Basil B said:

Agreed that amendment does not actually stop Brexit.

no, it doesn't stop Brexit

but as explained

it requires parliament to actively give its nod and say "go ahead, Brexit".

 

Link to post
Share on other sites
8 hours ago, Samui Bodoh said:

Never in my wildest thoughts could I have imagined a country would screw itself over so badly.

 

Here and I thought you were talking about the U.S. and imbecile Trump.... :w00t:

 

It would seem, two of the world's historic democratic countries are having their struggles amid considerable divisions... and are going more than a bit topsy-turvy.

 

And all the while, Putin is sitting back and laughing his a** off and rubbing his hands with glee.

 

Somehow, there must be better ways for democratic countries to have orderly and effective governments, and not devolve into becoming dictatorships as the only way of actually getting anything done.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.


×
×
  • Create New...