Jump to content

Democratic U.S. Sen. Kamala Harris jumps into 2020 White House race


webfact

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 133
  • Created
  • Last Reply
2 minutes ago, Benmart said:

Has she served as President of the USA before, or perhaps you have some mystical power to see into the future?

Of course she hasn't been president. She has elected office experience though and has been proven competent. "trump" started at the top with no experience in office and has been proven incompetent and shambolic. So it's a fair bet she would be much better and in my view it's a great bet the vast majority of American voters will see it that way too. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 minutes ago, lannarebirth said:

 

I don't know. I'm gaga over this chick. Yeah, her economics are a bit off but her heart is right and I haven't caught her in an overt lie and her funding is aces. Give her 5-10 years and she will be formiddable IMO. Yeah, and she turns me on a little too. So what?.

yeah redistribution of wealth would mean her heart is "right" to a liberal. So no lies that you know of, just spouting complete nonsense is ok and she will be a genius in no time.

got it

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, Jingthing said:

They are but they refer to a remarkably crude and juvenile con man that should have never been president, and it's a national priority now to stop this farce ASAP. 

so he was illegally elected or is it just enough racists voted against the liberal progressive hive?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Wow.

Look at all these possibilities!

 

https://www.washingtonpost.com/graphics/2018/politics/2020-presidential-hopefuls/

 

Many of these names have no name recognition outside their localities.

Of the more known ones, the only one I seriously hope doesn't run is Beto.

I'm not feeling him at this point.

Of course that Gabbard lady from Hawaii, she's announced but she is crazy to run with her history of extremist anti-gay policies. People change but not that much. 

 

A big X factor might be Sherrod Brown. 

 

Biden being the elephant in the room. I hope he doesn't run but if he does, he's a contender and the idea of him pairing up prematurely with a youngster (like Beto) is not such a bad idea. I know purists are horrified. To hell with purists. "trump" has got to go!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, Jingthing said:

Wow.

Look at all these possibilities!

 

https://www.washingtonpost.com/graphics/2018/politics/2020-presidential-hopefuls/

 

Many of these names have no name recognition outside their localities.

Of the more known ones, the only one I seriously hope doesn't run is Beto.

I'm not feeling him at this point.

Of course that Gabbard lady from Hawaii, she's announced but she is crazy to run with her history of extremist anti-gay policies. People change but not that much. 

 

A big X factor might be Sherrod Brown. 

 

Biden being the elephant in the room. I hope he doesn't run but if he does, he's a contender and the idea of him pairing up prematurely with a youngster (like Beto) is not such a bad idea. I know purists are horrified. To hell with purists. "trump" has got to go!

Don't worry. After the #metoo movement Biden has zero chance of running. They don't call him Creepy Joe for nothing.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, bristolboy said:

Says the person who likes Michael Bloomberg. Haven't we learned anything about nominating defenders of Wall Street?

It's not fair to say I support him for president. I do think if he elected he could be potentially be a great president. That's all. Do not try to hijack this thread to be about me, OK?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, webfact said:

Harris' campaign will focus on reducing the high cost of living with a middle-class tax credit, pursuing immigration and criminal justice changes and a Medicare-for-all healthcare system, aides said. She has said she will reject corporate political action committee donations.

I love the idea of no PAC money

 My question is,who will she get donations from!

4/18-"Harris told the hosts of “The Breakfast Club” radio show in New York that she was caught off guard when asked recently at a town hall about accepting corporate donations. She said at the time it "depends."

“So I’ve actually made a decision since I’ve had that conversation that I’m not going to accept corporate PAC checks,” she said Monday".

https://thehill.com/homenews/campaign/384408-kamala-harris-will-no-longer-accept-corporate-pac-money

 

https://www.opensecrets.org/members-of-congress/summary?cid=N00036915

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, lannarebirth said:

Are there really no Californians on this board? She's the cute chick in the prosecutor's office that caught Willie Brown's eye. She benefitted greatly as his mistress as did the one's before her and afterwards. Wille knows how to dole out the patronage. and get his mistress salaried.

"She's the cute chick in the prosecutor's office"

I was going to accuse you of being from the mid 20th century and then I read this:

"She benefitted greatly as his mistress..."

You hail from the 19 century?

But from whatever century you're living in, your attitude about women is self-evident.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, TopDeadSenter said:

A somewhat ironic statement after 2 years of meltdowns and temper tantrums from the never-trumpers aka democrat party and their fans, don't you think?

 

 It is the duty of the Republican party to analyze every dem candidate and find their Achilles heel to work on. Harris will not be a difficult target thanks to her history. Warren has already been binned thanks to lying about her Native American heritage and been proved to have used this to further her career. Cortez disqualifies herself every time she opens her mouth. Her "run train" aka Gang bang being the latest faux-pas. Most dems are already jokes thanks to Trump having given them hilarious nicknames, Cryin', Crazy, Lyin', Crooked et al.

 

 2020 will be a fun election. It's Trumps for the taking.

Lies, "alternative facts" and more lies!

Hardly surprising of a Trump- supporter!

 

What "history" does Harris have, that disqualifies her?

Warren native-american ancestry, and may it be oh-so-small!

Remember?

She took an DNA-test, that proved it!

And her using that ancestry for personal gains, has been debunked over and over and over...

But....baaaaaah...facts, amma right?!

And pray tell: where and when exactly did AOC disqualify herself?

Are you hinting to the times, she misspoke and then - right away- corrected herself?

Which is a far way from telling outright lies, like...ahm...who was the guy, who does that, more than every other politician in the history of the "greatest nation on Earth"?

 

And if you are amused by "funny" nicknames (Lyin was for Ted Crus, by the way and last time I checked, he was a Republican...but again: them damn facts!), you must have a kind-of-childlike humor!

 

By the way: I am not waiting for your reply!

It probably is full of more inaccuracies or right out lies! 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I actually dislike politicians especially the one's who have a degree in Political Science. Career politicians!

 Harris attended Howard University in Washington, D.C., where she majored in political science and economics.

 "Referring to immigration policy, the new senator from California, Kamala Harris, recently tweeted that California was going to "fight" and that the state "represents the future" of America".

https://news.gallup.com/opinion/polling-matters/233678/secession-politics-makes-sense-california.aspx

California represents the future of America -the highest income taxes in the USA 12.3%

Six states account for 58% of unauthorized immigrants:  California is on that list

http://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2018/11/28/5-facts-about-illegal-immigration-in-the-u-s/

 

[

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, mcambl61 said:

well I guess your opinion has the same value then?

 

please let that sink in if you are able

The problem is: I didn't make any claims!

You make claims- you support them with facts, evidence, sources, proof!

Not touchyfeely- stuff, insults and opinions!

And if you bring hard facts, it is up to me to debate them!

But you have nothing!

 

Let that sink in, if you are able!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 hours ago, TopDeadSenter said:

A somewhat ironic statement after 2 years of meltdowns and temper tantrums from the never-trumpers aka democrat party and their fans, don't you think?

 

 It is the duty of the Republican party to analyze every dem candidate and find their Achilles heel to work on. Harris will not be a difficult target thanks to her history. Warren has already been binned thanks to lying about her Native American heritage and been proved to have used this to further her career. Cortez disqualifies herself every time she opens her mouth. Her "run train" aka Gang bang being the latest faux-pas. Most dems are already jokes thanks to Trump having given them hilarious nicknames, Cryin', Crazy, Lyin', Crooked et al.

 

 2020 will be a fun election. It's Trumps for the taking.

You wanna buy a bridge ?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, mcambl61 said:

 

 

Warren is white , full on Caucasian, full stop. nothing can justify any other claim, nothing.

for at least six straight years during Warren’s tenure, Harvard University reported in federally mandated diversity statistics that it had a Native American woman in its senior ranks at the law school. According to both Harvard officials and federal guidelines, those statistics are almost always based on the way employees describe themselves.

 

https://www.bostonglobe.com/metro/2012/05/24/federal-documents-indicate-harvard-repeatedly-reported-elizabeth-warren-native-american/OZdiCFhjx5CCH3Es0sREHM/story.html

 

 

 

Harris Grew up in Quebec, so being a rampant socialist clown would be a normal occurrence. Diddling grandpa Willie Brown to get into office, another

Bay area scum bag, like most of them are, then took over for one of the most useless senators on earth, Barbara Boxer basically uncontested.


AOC is exactly the future of the liberal progressive lunatic platform of useless "democratic" socialists, where the democrats have been heading 

over the cliff of stupidity for decades all the while pretending not to be socialists. 

 

 

 

 

 

Love everything you say here, and you are spot on Sir.  (Y)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 hours ago, mcambl61 said:

yeah redistribution of wealth would mean her heart is "right" to a liberal. So no lies that you know of, just spouting complete nonsense is ok and she will be a genius in no time.

got it

You're the Trump supporter, right? Rooted in integrity and righteousness are we?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 hours ago, bristolboy said:

"She's the cute chick in the prosecutor's office"

I was going to accuse you of being from the mid 20th century and then I read this:

"She benefitted greatly as his mistress..."

You hail from the 19 century?

But from whatever century you're living in, your attitude about women is self-evident.

My attitude mirrors that of women who didn't sleep their way up the career ladder. Men too I imagine.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, lannarebirth said:

You're the Trump supporter, right? Rooted in integrity and righteousness are we?

well, i am not a liberal progressive, so I don't assume those who disagree are evil, just wrong.

Most liberals proudly tell those who disagree with their ideology that they are evil, stupid, racist,

and so forth. That is the clear example of self righteousness here.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.





×
×
  • Create New...