Jump to content

Foreigners now need to keep 800k in Thai bank for three months AFTER retirement extension is granted


Recommended Posts

  • Replies 2.9k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Posts

800.000 baht is not very much if you genuinely have retired and have committed to living in Thailand. Maybe the people getting worried do not really have enough to retire here? I know many people

They will also need a Urine sample to check for drugs and a poo sample to check for worms,  i will just leave my underpants on there desk.   

And I thought the 800,000 baht was for living expenses, not as am interst earner for the Thai banks!    

Posted Images

26 minutes ago, DrTuner said:

You never know when some event makes it inhabitable. 

It's already comfortably inhabitable. Or were you aiming for "uninhabitable," which isn't quite the right term either?

  • Haha 2
Link to post
Share on other sites

So, for me, the question is does everyone extending on the 800K in their bank account also need the 400K year long minimum by 1 March, when this new rule is supposed to take effect?

  • Confused 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

You may be lucky enough to be able tie up 800,000 Baht for five months every year without needing to spend of it, in which case bully for you.
There might be others who have committed themselves to Thailand by buying themselves a condo to enjoy their retirement in, so don’t have a spare 800,000 Baht they can leave untouched in the bank.
There might be those who’ve retired here under the previous conditions and didn’t expect the goalposts to be moved.
One wonders if those who can demonstrate they have the current required monthly income might be the next to have the goalposts moved.
For the life of me I really don’t understand the reasoning for needing to leave 800,000 Baht in the bank for five months of the year when it’s supposed to be evidence that you have sufficient to live on.

Actually 6 months, 3 before and 3 after renewal.

The only “ grandfathering “ which appears to be allowed is for people here since 1998 and over 60 years old ( back in 1998 I assume) , they are allowed 200,000 but I doubt many fit the requirements.
Link to post
Share on other sites
8 minutes ago, Suradit69 said:

It's already comfortably inhabitable. Or were you aiming for "uninhabitable," which isn't quite the right term either?

Ooops. Yeah my bad, can't edit anymore either.

Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.


×
×
  • Create New...