Jump to content

New retiree visa rules bewilder Thai immigration: Source


Recommended Posts

3 hours ago, pattayadgw said:

If BJ keeps going down this road he won't have too many foreigners left in LOS.  Just keep squeezing BJ and at the end of it all it will be just another case of som nom naaaa!!  you make ya bed... now sleep in it!!

he just wants visitors, like in and out, not the ones staying ....    “My goal is to make visitors to our country, whether here for tourism or business, feel safe,” said Surachate,

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

so i guess this applies to not next extension but one after mines due April so as usual i spent 800,000 quickly after last extension and then as needed topped up as year went on thne made sure their was 800,000 imn it in November and kept it ready.

 

Guess ill find out  soon when i renew 

 

Maybe 500,000 visa elite valid 5 years is a good alternative now you have to keep 400,000 anyway 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

and 400K there at ALL times
Which means an extra 325,000 using the bank deposit method over the 65,000 monthly income method (65,000 X 5) since the 800,000 which is supposed to prove sufficient funds for living in Thailand can't actually be used for support 5 months of the year. In addition half of the 800,000 support money can't be used at all and must remain in a bank account.

I'm sure this makes sense to someone at the IO office as a method of solving a perceived problem with some retirees in Thailand but baby and bath water tossing might be at play here.

Sent from my SM-G965F using Thailand Forum - Thaivisa mobile app

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

28 minutes ago, Sheryl said:

Good idea in theory but... unfortunately, if the requirement for the new 10 year O-A visa is any indication,  any requirement they would make for health insurance would  on the one hand not be adequate to enable people to pay their  hospital bills in case of major illness/accident while on the other hand including unnecessary OPD cover,  causing the premium to be  25 - 50% higher than it should be for the overall (very low) level of cover. An almost worthless and needlessly expensive policy that would still leave you needing additional  cover.

 

It is a genuine problem but believe me, you do not want this government making up a health insurance clause. They simply do not take the time to research and figure out what sort of cover is needed to avert the problems that frequently arise. Rather they appear to be unduly influenced by local insurance companies and to design requirements tailored to local products that are poorly designed.

 

And then there is the problem o that many people of retirement  have significant pre-existing conditions that would either make them uninsurable or result in significant exclusions (leaving them in essence still uninsured except for accidents).

 

there are things the government could set up and require that would actually make sense but that is nto likely to be what emerges fin any mandatory health insurance requirement.

As soon as they start an O-A ten year visa let me know. I want one.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, smedly said:

if they want to check if someone cheated the seasoning rules using and agent and bribing an IO - all they have to do is check the used bank account and it will clearly show the 800k baht was deposited and withdrawn on the same day as the extension application, no need at all for this stupid nonsense

Who is 'they'?

  • Confused 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, steve73 said:

It is not an attempt to tighten up on the agents.

Correct. The only people that need these agents are foreigners so if you squeeze the foreigners hard enough, they bugger off and the agents will magically disappear. This handily obviates the need for any more foxes to watch the chickens and should give enough time for the aforementioned chickens and their agents to seek out alternative revenue streams..

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, fusion58 said:

I was at CW today, and officer with whom I spoke indicated that three months’ worth of seasoning - not two - were required of me for a retirement extension.

Lopburi office opened about 8 years, and money has always been seasoned for 3 months, I have said why not 2 months like other offices, they said here is 3 months.

So now can not touch the money for 6 months. 

  • Confused 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, Just1Voice said:

I'm just glad I can show a monthly income into a Thai bank for well above the required 65K a month.  With recently printed out deposits from my bank for the past year.  

Are you sure? There was a recent report that this will not be an option at the Jomtien immigration office. Only an Income letter or bank deposit would be accepted.

  • Confused 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, Fex Bluse said:

And, to add insult to injury, the types of Thai accounts the money can be held in are crap, low interest accounts. 

 

They don't like us here, their logic is to squeeze and milk us or to drive us away. They don't care which one. 

Fixed income account 2%.  Given the fall of your currency against the baht how much is the real interest rate at home?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Lopburi office opened about 8 years, and money has always been seasoned for 3 months, I have said why not 2 months like other offices, they said here is 3 months.
So now can not touch the money for 6 months. 

It is ( currently) 2 months for the first extension then 3 months after that.

The new ruling ( starting March 1st ) states 2 months before renewal then 3 months after , although this is not etched in stone and could well be 3 before and 3 after .

Whatever the ruling confusion will abound and no doubt some IO’s will interpret the rules differently.
  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Dumbastheycome said:

The new  requirement may be a problem  for some but I have just thought of a  complication not yet mentioned.

I am guessing that the confirmation of the  permanent deposit of 400,000 maybe would be asked for at the date of a new 90 day report date following  an extension. Or a special visit to do same. There must be  some process to provide the  confirmation but as yet  no explanation that I have heard of.

However if any person  exits Thailand  for any time prior to that 3 months in possession of a re entry permit and is away until a date after the 3 month time  period the current 90 day report date has expired and starts fresh at  date of re  entry and irrelevant to any previous.

I am up for applying for another extension in  2 weeks time. I also plan to get a re entry permit on same  day for an exit shortly  after. 

The money on deposit is not an issue because I am fortunate enough to have 800,000 which  never leaves the  bank  year on year.

My question is  what is/will be the process to confirm that if I was  not here 3 months after an extension?

 

Easiest way.  Retroactively at your next application for extension of stay have you show a bank statement for the previous twelve months.  All the data immigration needs to see whether you complied with the new rules is all there in the bank statement.  No addition visits to immigration necessary. Absolutely no connection to 90 Day Reports.

  • Like 1
  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Mango Bob said:

I got an idea lets just start all over again and let those embassies issue income letters just like before and forget how you made a fool of yourself here BJ.

It's the embassies, not BJ who unilaterally decided to stop issuing income letters.  So who're the ones making fools of themselves?  When this was apparently discussed between Thai Immigration and the embassies back in May 2018 I don't believe BJ was even in the immigration division.  Repeated FOIA requests from the British Embassy have been answered by saying that no one on the British side bothered to take notes of what was discussed in the meetings.  We can't be sure what was said, but we can now be sure that certainly the UK, US, Australia, and Danish embassies made a colossal mistake by deciding on their own to stop the income letter service to their citizens.  Other embassies that did not make the same mistake continue to offer their citizens income letters and those letters continue to be accepted by Thai Immigration.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, HuskerDo said:

They don't like us here, their logic is to squeeze and milk us or to drive us away. They don't care which one. 

The Philippines requires an initial bank deposit of US $10,000 and it can be used as a deposit to purchase a property.  The added bonus is that there are no greedy Thais and the Filipinos generally speak good English.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.





×
×
  • Create New...