Jump to content
BANGKOK

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

webfact

Democrat Schiff draws Trump ire with House intel probes

Recommended Posts

1 minute ago, elmrfudd said:

crimes that are invented after an interview, yeah. and yet a myriad of govt officials get off scott free for the same

thing....amazing isn't it? I am sure it is just a coincidence.

Is Rudy in the house?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 minutes ago, Jingthing said:
5 minutes ago, elmrfudd said:

crimes that are invented after an interview, yeah. and yet a myriad of govt officials get off scott free for the same

thing....amazing isn't it? I am sure it is just a coincidence.

Is Rudy in the house?

no, but hypocrisy is

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
11 hours ago, thaibeachlovers said:

IF a US president WAS a Putin stooge I'd agree with you.

You actually have no idea if Trump colluded or not , biased opinion is simply that. Mueller has more knowledge of the facts than anyone on this forum so let him finish his job and present his case.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
54 minutes ago, elmrfudd said:

crimes that are invented after an interview, yeah. and yet a myriad of govt officials get off scott free for the same

thing....amazing isn't it? I am sure it is just a coincidence.

Moronic delusion is no substitute for reasoned argument , make believe is no match for truth , partisan bias will always be trumped by independent thought.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I always wondered how the spouses of child abusers could defend and excuse the appalling behaviour of their partners.

Given the level of willful delusion by certain members on these threads I begin to understand.

It seems that no degree of falsehood and immorality is considered worse than admitting you fell in love with a monster.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
20 minutes ago, joecoolfrog said:

Moronic delusion is no substitute for reasoned argument , make believe is no match for truth , partisan bias will always be trumped by independent thought.

your opinion does not make a truth or a reasoned argument, neither does your partisan bias or insults. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
12 minutes ago, elmrfudd said:

your opinion does not make a truth or a reasoned argument, neither does your partisan bias or insults. 

Yeah "trump" and the fans of the lying-est prez in history don't do insults. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
38 minutes ago, elmrfudd said:

your opinion does not make a truth or a reasoned argument, neither does your partisan bias or insults. 

Im a conservative voting englishman so what partisan bias is at play ? If you consider facts as insults then thank you for confirming my point.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Off topic posts and the replies have been removed. 

 

Some posts containing inflammatory comments directed at other members have been removed.  Please be civil when posting:

 

7) You will respect fellow members and post in a civil manner. No personal attacks, hateful or insulting towards other members, (flaming) Stalking of members on either the forum or via PM will not be allowed.
 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Why does Trump behave like someone who has something to hide?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 2/7/2019 at 8:23 AM, Tug said:

You got that right chomper!now Donald will face real examination perhaps enough so that his money and perhaps because  of his position he will be fully exposed for what he is

Silly people.  Trump is the greatest Troll President we have ever had.  He will face nothing except for the thanks of the American People.  Keep on dreaming...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, heybruce said:

but evidence of crimes on the campaign and in Trump's inner circle is abundant.  Trump's lawyer is going to prison for campaign finance violations and other crimes.  His son had a meeting in Trump Tower with Russians in the clear expectation that he get dirt on Hillary Clinton, an obvious attempt at collusion.  Evidence that Roger Stone was working with people to get Russian hacked emails released at conveniently timed moments was strong enough to lead to his arrest.

 

Incorrect on all points I'm afraid... You're just repeating Democrat/MSM talking points. If there was "abundant" evidence of crimes, then there would have been indictments and prosecutions, however there have been NONE. So get your "facts" straight okay? Just because CNN told you there were, doesn't actually make it so. Trump's lawyer is not "going to prison for campaign finance violations". So what if Trump's son had a very short meeting with one Russian lawyer? There was nothing illegal about that, they can meet with whoever they want. (Interesting how you bring that up as "evidence" yet completely overlook the Trump Dossier which was fabricated with the help of Russians and funneled through a foreign agent...). I guess that is "collusion" and only "illegal" if the Trump campaign does it ?? So when (not if) the Clinton campaign does it, ironically by colluding with Russians (ahem,...), then it is suddenly called "opposition research" and completely fine! Then it's quite okay to leak that research to their Democrat cronies in the DOJ and FBI who then leak it to the media in order to justify their partisan investigation, the goal of which was to overturn a legal election result. No, that's all fine and above board right! There is also no evidence that Roger Stone was "working with people to get Russian hacked emails" - you seriously need to stop getting your "news" from CNN because you clearly have no idea as to the facts of the case. Furthermore, and please do pay attention here, there is no evidence that the "hacked" DNC emails originated from a Russian source, something Julian Assange himself has repeated several times. Once again, you are mistaking political talking points and opinions for facts. And I really can't help the fact that you can't tell the difference. Submitting smart ass retorts to my comments with out any facts to contradict them doesn't win you the argument, regardless of how many people agree with you.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
The only people indicted having anything to do with Russian interference in the election process were a bunch of Russians trolling around on social media, and it's not like the USA has never interfered in an other countries election. Those individuals will never stand trial. None of the other indictments or convictions have had anything to do with so called Russian collusion.  So what are we left with?  Endless "allegations" that political hacks like Schiff will use to continue this crap ad nauseam for the sole purpose of continuing the partisan bickering. If Schiff wants to release "closed door" congressional testimony, I'm all for it, but release it to the public so the public can decide for themselves.  
 
The intent by the likes of Schiff is to keep anything Trump under a cloud and everything unresolved until 2020. It is certainly NOT to deal with the issues, investigate them and release a report. 
 
For all the good that has taken place regarding the economy as it relates to jobs, business, etc., the Dems won't give Trump any credit and two years into Trumps leadership, idiots like Congressman Brad Sherman say Trump is riding Obama's coattails on the economy.  If the Dems take over in 2020, they will increase taxes and companies will simply invest less, hire less and look back overseas for production.  Unemployment will increase and when that happens the cost of the social services will increase.  Neither the economy nor wages are where anyone would like to see them but it's been a pretty decent start. As the former owner of a manufacturing company, I can tell everyone first hand that confidence in the leadership, tax stability, structural integrity, etc. are paramount in planning business strategy and making businesses grow. One has to have confidence in the future outlook before they take risk. All one has to do is look around Los Angeles to see the building boom that has taken place over the last two years. 
 
 

Yet those Californians handed the GOP their hat in the midterms. Prolly because it was a massive conspiracy by the ..........


Sent from my iPhone using Thailand Forum - Thaivisa mobile app

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
TWO YEARS and ZERO to do with collusion has been discovered.
How long does the taxpayer have to fund this fiasco? For ever? Till Trump leaves office in 2025?


It’s nice to know that you and you alone know everything that the investigation has found. I’m sure glad we have you to consult.


Sent from my iPhone using Thailand Forum - Thaivisa mobile app

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 hours ago, 348GTS said:

 

Incorrect on all points I'm afraid... You're just repeating Democrat/MSM talking points. If there was "abundant" evidence of crimes, then there would have been indictments and prosecutions, however there have been NONE. So get your "facts" straight okay? Just because CNN told you there were, doesn't actually make it so. Trump's lawyer is not "going to prison for campaign finance violations". So what if Trump's son had a very short meeting with one Russian lawyer? There was nothing illegal about that, they can meet with whoever they want. (Interesting how you bring that up as "evidence" yet completely overlook the Trump Dossier which was fabricated with the help of Russians and funneled through a foreign agent...). I guess that is "collusion" and only "illegal" if the Trump campaign does it ?? So when (not if) the Clinton campaign does it, ironically by colluding with Russians (ahem,...), then it is suddenly called "opposition research" and completely fine! Then it's quite okay to leak that research to their Democrat cronies in the DOJ and FBI who then leak it to the media in order to justify their partisan investigation, the goal of which was to overturn a legal election result. No, that's all fine and above board right! There is also no evidence that Roger Stone was "working with people to get Russian hacked emails" - you seriously need to stop getting your "news" from CNN because you clearly have no idea as to the facts of the case. Furthermore, and please do pay attention here, there is no evidence that the "hacked" DNC emails originated from a Russian source, something Julian Assange himself has repeated several times. Once again, you are mistaking political talking points and opinions for facts. And I really can't help the fact that you can't tell the difference. Submitting smart ass retorts to my comments with out any facts to contradict them doesn't win you the argument, regardless of how many people agree with you.

" You're just repeating Democrat/MSM talking points. If there was "abundant" evidence of crimes, then there would have been indictments and prosecutions, however there have been NONE. "

 

Are you living in a cave?  There have been many indictments, prosecutions, guilty pleas and prison sentences.  Don Jr hasn't been indicted yet, but the investigation isn't over.  The DNC was hacked by Gucifer, which intelligence agencies believe is a Russian organization.  Julian Assange is a liar and a sexual predator who can't be trusted. 

 

Oh right...you indicated you get your news from Fox.  I'll be you can't even name a real news program on Fox, and you get all your "news" from the irrational rants on their pundit programs.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...