Jump to content

Human error and outdated IT led to Hakeem al-Araibi's detention, says Australian border force official


webfact

Recommended Posts

Human error and outdated IT led to Hakeem al-Araibi's detention, says border force official

Australian Border Force boss Michael Outram admits it was within his own organisation ‘where the process broke down’

Helen Davidson

 

An individual border force officer forgetting to send an email likely led to the refugee Hakeem al-Araibi spending almost three months in a Thai prison fighting off Bahraini attempts to have him extradited.

 

The head of the Australian Border Force, Michael Outram, told Senate estimates it was within his own organisation “where the process broke down” and Al-Araibi was allowed to board a flight to Thailand, unaware he was walking into the waiting arms of Thai and Bahraini authorities.

 

Outram apologised for the border force’s error but not for Al-Araibi’s detention, saying he couldn’t state that the error was the sole cause, or that Al-Araibi would not have been detained anyway.

 

Full story: https://www.theguardian.com/sport/2019/feb/18/human-error-and-outdated-it-led-to-hakeem-al-araibis-detention-says-border-force-official

 

-- The Guardian 2019-02-20

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Amnesty Australia seeks inquiry over ‘monumental’ error in al-Araibi case

By MARISA CHIMPRABHA 
THE NATION

 

ef545005caac6734850f0ec6ad1e3343.jpeg

Footballer and refugee Hakeem al-Araibi (L) and Australian Prime Minister Scott Morrison (R) shake hands during a meeting at Parliament House in Canberra, Australia, 14 February///EPA-EFE

 

AMNESTY International Australia has called for the Australian government to conduct an independent investigation into what it called “a monumental mistake” that led to the much-publicised arrest and detention of a former Bahrain national footballer in Thailand.

 

The group’s call was in response to comments from Australian Border Force (ABF) commissioner Michael Outram on Monday that “human error” in his forces had led to Hakeem al-Araibi, a refugee with Australian residency, being detained for more than two months in a Thai jail and facing the threat of extradition to his native country.

 

“It is absolutely unacceptable that Hakeem, a completely innocent man supposedly under the Australian government’s care, was detained for 76 days in Thailand in fear for his life simply because someone at Border Force forgot to send an email,” Amnesty International Australia’s Tim O’Connor said.

 

The Australian government must conduct an independent investigation into this “monumental mistake” that caused a young man and his family months of heartache and could have cost them much more had he been sent back to Bahrain, he said.

 

The government must ensure that no other refugee is ever put in this situation again, O’Connor said. The results of any investigation must be made public immediately, and systems put in place to ensure no other person would suffer as Hakeem and his family did, he added.

 

“Human error must never again result in someone’s life being endangered,” he said.

 

Thailand faced blame and severe criticism over the arrest of al-Araibi on November 27 at Suvarnabhumi Airport, when he and his wife arrived here on a honeymoon trip.

 

Thailand effected the arrest on a request from Bahrain, which was alerted about al-Araibi’s trip through an Interpol red notice posted by Australia. Bahrain then sought his extradition over charges he faced in his country, which led to an extradition trial and resulted in him being detained in jail until this month.

 

The Australian government was at the forefront of repeated calls for the Thai government to release al-Araibi although the case was being heard by a Thai court. Australian Prime Minister Scott Morrison stepped up pressure by twice writing to his Thai counterpart, Prime Minister Prayut Chan-o-cha, to free the Bahraini.

 

Australia’s sporting organisations protested the arrest and one of them cancelled a friendly football match scheduled to be held in Thailand. Amnesty International Australia also condemned Bangkok, demanding that the 25-year-old Bahraini be freed immediately.

 

Thai Foreign Minister Don Pramudwinai insisted that it was an Australian Interpol alert that had led to Bahrain requesting al-Araibai’s extradition. Morrison denied the information.

 

Al-Araibi was eventually released on February 11 and returned to Australia after Bahrain dropped its extradition request following a visit to the Gulf country by Don to discuss the issue.

 

According to Australian media, ABF commissioner Outram said his officer failed to send a notification to Australian Federal Police (AFP) and the Department of Home Affairs, which would have alerted them to the fact that al-Araibi was on a protection visa in Australia.

 

That fact, once revealed to the AFP the day after al-Araibi was arrested in Thailand, prompted Interpol to withdraw the “red notice” issued at the request of Bahrain. Had it been known to the AFP beforehand, the AFP-based Interpol team would not have issued the notice.

 

The email notification is a manual, not automatic, process, Outram told a Senate inquiry on Monday night that “having reviewed the circumstances surrounding al-Araibi, it is clear that human error occurred within the [border force] process”.

 

Outram conceded that the mistake made by the border force had directly resulted in the AFP informing Thai authorities that a red notice existed for al-Araibi. “The officer in this case forgot to send an email. It’s as simple as that,” he said. However, he declined to apologise to al-Araibi, saying his detention could have occurred by some other means too, such as direct contact between Bahrain and Thailand.

 

Source: http://www.nationmultimedia.com/detail/breakingnews/30364492

 

thenation_logo.jpg

-- © Copyright The Nation 2019-02-21
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Quote

Human error and outdated IT

Oh dear! Anything the Thais can do we can do better

Tell me again: Which country is like Burma with electric?

 

Sorry my Ozzie friends, couldn't resist. But I know, like your superior Brit cousins, you can take a joke at your expense, unlike the Uranus Sanctimonious lot

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Amazing that a persons life can hang on such a thin thread .... what if the person concerned did in fact send the email and it disappeared into black hole as have many of mine ... you'd think a more secure and double/triple check system could be put in place and not leave it down to one individual and 1 email .... sheesh !

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, grumbleweed said:

Oh dear! Anything the Thais can do we can do better

Tell me again: Which country is like Burma with electric?

 

Sorry my Ozzie friends, couldn't resist. But I know, like your superior Brit cousins, you can take a joke at your expense, unlike the Uranus Sanctimonious lot

Never a chance miss to drag the US into your nonsense. It reveals a character defect that is owned by you...thank goodness.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Snow Leopard said:

How old is the Australian IT system if someone can't send an email. 

If this was the case - No problem to send but problem to receive ... :coffee1:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

48 minutes ago, British Bulldog said:

Amazing that a persons life can hang on such a thin thread .... what if the person concerned did in fact send the email and it disappeared into black hole as have many of mine ... you'd think a more secure and double/triple check system could be put in place and not leave it down to one individual and 1 email .... sheesh !

Excellent point regarding a (near) fool-proof system.

 

Maybe a hi-tech system should be in place - like farcebook, whatsupp, and twitter - even a 5 year old can handle this complicated technology ????

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, klauskunkel said:

Could have, would have, should have..., but it didn't. Apologize to the guy.

An apologize for Thai's means admitting wrongdoing - admitting wrongdoing means loss of face - so better to deny ... :coffee1:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Email... I wonder if they really mean Email?

The Email protocol doesn't guarantee delivery of the message.

So I hope for them this is a simple mistake in the statement, or they really use email, in which case it's (almost criminal) negligence.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

33 minutes ago, ttrd said:

An apologize for Thai's means admitting wrongdoing - admitting wrongdoing means loss of face - so better to deny ... :coffee1:

assuming you are referring to the point it was a screwup at the Thai end - a fact check on your part might be appropriate. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, AntiAut said:

What is an email pls, can you speak Thai, me no underesetand.

The so called "Australian Border Force" staffed by Australian public service officers level 3 to what ever, are basically a group of people with severe personality disorders! A quick look will see thieves and and petty criminals pepper their ranks. If you read the Australian Federal Ombudsman reports on the ABF you will see the total arrogance and inability to accept errors of judgement when dealing with the public! They are never held to account!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, British Bulldog said:

Amazing that a persons life can hang on such a thin thread .... what if the person concerned did in fact send the email and it disappeared into black hole as have many of mine ... you'd think a more secure and double/triple check system could be put in place and not leave it down to one individual and 1 email .... sheesh !

Exactly, is there not both electronic and manual checking, by a senior officer, on matters this sensitive / this critical to both the diplomat scenario, critical to the absolutely correct functioning of the Australian authorities and the interpol authorities and of course to prevent and errors such as did happen which put a young man in jail for 3 months?

 

Surely there should be a requirement for a quite senior officer to sign off, and quickly, before any action is taken and to ensure all appropriate actions are in process?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, grumbleweed said:

Oh dear! Anything the Thais can do we can do better

Tell me again: Which country is like Burma with electric?

 

Sorry my Ozzie friends, couldn't resist. But I know, like your superior Brit cousins, you can take a joke at your expense, unlike the Uranus Sanctimonious lot

That’s good considering the Brits cannot even deport people with terrorist links who are allowed to stay in the country because the European Court says it’s ok 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, manarak said:

Email... I wonder if they really mean Email?

The Email protocol doesn't guarantee delivery of the message.

So I hope for them this is a simple mistake in the statement, or they really use email, in which case it's (almost criminal) negligence.

So what form of communication do you suggest they use registered mail?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Maybe the main lesson to be learned from this unfortunate chain of events is for refugees to remain in the country that has offered them refugee status until their status has been upgraded to that of citizen.

 

Particularly where the refugee has been convicted, rightly or wrongly, of a crime in their home country and is at risk if away from the country of refuge, even if supposedly covered by any UN dictate.

 

It seems that at least a couple of official refugee associations in Australia advise that such, non urgent, overseas travel is not advisable, presumably for the very reasons as seen in this case. That Hakeem appears to have been given contrary advice by other organisations clearly did not lessen the risks.

 

In any event, it seems rather foolish to plan a honeymoon trip just a few months (by all accounts) before he would have qualified for an Aussie passport. It's still uncertain precisely how Bahrain caught wind of his trip to Thailand, possibly via official channels as noted in the OP, or maybe simply by word of mouth as he was no doubt still in contact with family and friends back home. He appears to have upset the Bahrain authorities subsequent to his arrival in Australia by criticising some highly connected officials (is this normal for those under refugee status?), so his movements may well have been under some scrutiny, who knows?

 

Thailand was an easy target as the party at fault, but these matters are never one of black and white. That their final actions to make direct contact with Bahrain resolved the issue is a definite plus. The actions of all actors, Bahrain, Australia, Thailand and Hakeem, all played a part and fully deserve any subsequent scrutiny.  

  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Ramdas said:

Thaïs incompetence needless to say, I wonder if they received a bribe from Barhain ????

Would you care to elaborate how following international law and protocol is incompetence?

 

From what I see the incompetence is clearly evident on the part of the ABP and a rather shabby excuse/admittance of  “human error and outdated IT” which resulted in causing a young man and his family much distress.

 

I don’t see how Thailand can be blamed.

 

Yes Thailand has a lot of incompetent officials but in this case I think the diplomatic move to talk to Bahrain which resulted in Al-Araibi being released should be lauded if anything.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.




×
×
  • Create New...