Jump to content

Doomed with Democrats, Trump's budget boosts Pentagon, targets safety net


webfact

Recommended Posts

Doomed with Democrats, Trump's budget boosts Pentagon, targets safety net

By Roberta Rampton and Ginger Gibson

 

2019-03-11T123434Z_1_LYNXMPEF2A11F_RTROPTP_4_USA-TRUMP-BUDGET.JPG

An aide puts her hand on a copy of Volume 1 of U.S. President Donald Trump's budget for Fiscal Year 2020 after it was delivered by the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) to the House Budget Committee room on Capitol Hill in Washington U.S., March 11, 2019. REUTERS/Kevin Lamarque

 

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - President Donald Trump called on Monday for spending more U.S. taxpayer money on the military and a U.S.-Mexico border wall, while overhauling social safety-net programs in a budget plan likely to die in Congress but live on in his 2020 re-election campaign.

 

Like past presidential budget proposals, Trump's plan was highly unlikely to become law. It was immediately panned by Democrats, who control the House of Representatives and blocked Trump's push for border wall funding in a standoff that led last year to a five-week partial federal government shutdown.

 

The $4.7 trillion plan asks for $8.6 billion (6.5 billion pounds) to build a wall on the border with Mexico - more than six times what Congress gave Trump for border projects in each of the past two fiscal years, and 6 percent more than he has corralled by invoking emergency powers this year after he failed to get the money he wanted.

 

It also includes proposals to overhaul Medicare, Medicaid and other costly social programs that help the poor and underprivileged.

 

The budget makes no immediate progress on reducing the federal deficit or the national debt, issues once paramount to Trump's fellow Republicans.

 

"President Trump has somehow managed to produce a budget request even more untethered from reality than his past two," said Democratic U.S. Representative Nita Lowey, chairwoman of the House Appropriations Committee.

 

Democratic Senator Patrick Leahy, chairman of the Senate Appropriations Committee, said in a statement that Trump's plan "is not worth the paper it is printed on."

 

Acting administration budget chief Russell Vought will defend Trump's plan before the House Budget Committee on Tuesday.

 

"This budget contains nearly $2.7 trillion in savings, more spending reductions proposed than any administration in history," Vought told reporters at the White House on Monday. "This budget will balance in 15 years."

 

Like last year's $4.4 trillion Trump budget, which was dead on arrival on Capitol Hill, the 2020 version relies on rosy economic projections to achieve projected balance in the future.

 

"We view the president’s 2020 budget proposal as a political priority-setting document. ... Congressional dynamics will mostly restrain requested domestic spending cuts and major changes to authorization language," said Ed Mills, policy analyst at financial firm Raymond James in a research note.

 

The stakes for a spending deal of some sort in Congress are high this year. On Oct. 1, when fiscal 2020 begins, a deadline also arrives for lifting the federal debt limit. Failing to do that could risk an economy-shaking U.S. government debt default.

 

PENTAGON BOOSTED

A major part of Trump's budget is his proposed 4 percent boost in defence spending to $750 billion. It relies on using the emergency Overseas Contingency Operations (OCO) account - derided by conservatives as a slush fund - to skirt spending caps set out in a 2011 fiscal restraint law.

 

Non-defence spending was held below those caps, thanks to steep proposed funding cuts to the State Department (23 percent) and Environmental Protection Agency (31 percent), among others.

 

A senior administration official told reporters the budget would cut U.S. aid to foreign countries by $13 billion.

 

It would also cut federal subsidies to farmers, add a user fee on e-cigarettes and end a tax credit for electric car purchases.

 

Tax cuts have been a priority for the Republican White House and Congress in the past two years, rather than deficit reduction. The deficit ran to $900 billion in 2019 and the national debt has ballooned to $22 trillion.

 

The Committee for a Responsible Budget said Trump's budget would add $10.5 trillion to the debt over a decade, and criticized the White House for what it called a "fantasy assumption" of 3 percent economic growth over that timeframe.

 

Unless the White House and Congress reach a spending deal, automatic spending caps from the 2011 law will kick in on Oct. 1, adding another level of urgency to the fall deadlines.

 

House Budget Committee Chairman John Yarmuth said House Democrats would put out their own budget proposal around the first week of April and that he hoped for a deal with the Senate.

 

“The ingredients ... are there to make a reasonable deal. And the White House is the wild card,” he said.

 

(Reporting by Roberta Rampton and Ginger Gibson; Additional reporting by Mike Stone, Susan Cornwell and Patricia Zengerle; Editing by Kevin Drawbaugh, Peter Cooney and Bill Trott)

 

reuters_logo.jpg

-- © Copyright Reuters 2019-03-12
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Trump once again requests deep cuts in U.S. science spending

For the third year in a row, President Donald Trump’s administration has unveiled a budget request to Congress that calls for deep spending cuts at many federal science agencies, including a 13% cut for the National Institutes of Health (NIH) and a 12% cut for the National Science Foundation (NSF), while providing hefty increases for the military.

https://www.sciencemag.org/news/2019/03/trump-once-again-requests-deep-cuts-us-science-spending?utm_campaign=news_daily_2019-03-11&et_rid=314208203&et_cid=2710030

Next thing you know he'll be convening a panel of human-caused climate change denialists to examine the evidence for and against. Oh..wait a minute...

Trump to set up science panel to counter his own government's climate change consensus, officials say

https://www.chicagotribune.com/news/nationworld/politics/ct-white-house-climate-science-20190224-story.html

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 hours ago, malibukid said:

won't happen.  he forgets who controls congress.  he's in for another spanking.  

Yes, but what's going on in that not pretty big orange head?


 

Quote

 

Trump’s budget is heartless and whackadoodle

Fair enough: President Trump’s heartless and whackadoodle budget, released on Monday, will never actually become law. Even when his party had unified control of government, he couldn’t get Capitol Hill to take major portions of his budget terribly seriously.

 

 

https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/trumps-budget-shows-he-cares-little-about-the-little-guy/2019/03/11/0db97060-4439-11e9-aaf8-4512a6fe3439_story.html

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So just to sum up.

He has no plan to pay off the huge debt.

He wants how many trillion dollars to pay for a useless wall that Mexico is supposed to pay?

He wants to increase the military budget so that research into building new nuclear weapons can be built.

At the same time he slashes funding to scientific research (for medicine, IT  and other standard nation building projects)

 And a few pennies to the "common folk"

 The slogan was Dump Trump, now it is changing to Chump Trump.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I actually read the healthcare section of the bill - full of doublespeak. Even if you paint it purple and call it a plum, it's still another ripoff to the little guy to send money to the 1%. What I believe is the Trump Crime Family and other such dingleberries sense the pendulum is swinging back towards common sense (medicare for all is no longer a crazy concept, socialism is not a dirty word if you marry it to democratic). They are grabbing all they can while they can. Greed - pure, sad, and simple.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On ‎3‎/‎12‎/‎2019 at 2:32 PM, webfact said:

end a tax credit for electric car purchases.

I like that. Without the tax credit let's see who wants to buy those turkeys.

Electric cars are not the answer. IMO, hydrogen fuel cell is a better way, but little enthusiasm in the halls of power.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.




×
×
  • Create New...