Jump to content
BANGKOK 24 May 2019 17:02
webfact

May seeks Brexit delay after third vote on her deal is derailed

Recommended Posts

3 hours ago, Laughing Gravy said:

Your first sentence. I disagree with, as the politicians just don't want us to leave the EU. You can't get clearer than leave or remain. That was on the first ballot paper plus with David Cameron telling everyone, what leave actually was. Leaving the CU, SM, ECJ.

 

No doubt those posters will try and defend it and pretend it didn't happen but the are lying to themselves and everyone else.

 

I agree with the second statement but would really show democracy isn't being upheld. it would be EU democracy, vote until we get the right answer.

 

Who was it that said, "To repeat, absolutely nobody is talking about threatening our place in the single market"??

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, puipuitom said:

yes, a landslide overwhelmingly dream-majority of 51,88 %, thanks to Boris the Liar Johnson c.s, while only a mare 48,11% voted for "remain", and 27,6 % were too stupid and too lazy to vote.

But.. the British forget.. you need two for tango, so.. also the EU.

For me.. we NEVER had to allow the UK to join in, why we did not follow Charles de Gaulle... so...throw the British out.. 29 March 23:00 GMT.

Happily... 350 million pounds per week for the NHS... so.. you all are extremely happy.

Boris 350 mln pounds.jpg

Did you mention (B)-Liar?

 

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

In 1963 the U.K. asked to be a member of the E.E.C., it was vetoed by de Gaulle. 

In 1967 the U.K. implored again, but again vetoed by de Gaulle. 

Finally the third "begging" was accepted. 

 

What we have now, 52% of the U.K. voters want to leave the E.U..

 

The government and parliament doesn't seem to consider that enough/worthwhile;

and "beseech" again, this time the E.U..

 

Considered as a "miserable" attitude, by many, in the U.K. & Europe. 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
11 minutes ago, luckyluke said:

In 1963 the U.K. asked to be a member of the E.E.C., it was vetoed by de Gaulle. 

In 1967 the U.K. implored again, but again vetoed by de Gaulle. 

Finally the third "begging" was accepted. 

 

What we have now, 52% of the U.K. voters want to leave the E.U..

 

The government and parliament doesn't seem to consider that enough/worthwhile;

and "beseech" again, this time the E.U..

 

Considered as a "miserable" attitude, by many, in the U.K. & Europe. 

 

The frogs will miss an opportunity to kick the poms in the ass if they agree to an extension.

Will that ever happen, i don't think so, they love their little power trips.

  • Haha 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

^

We Belgians, being considered by most "dominant" countries as "insignifiant", are rather amused by this actual pandemonium. 

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
27 minutes ago, Thingamabob said:

If there is another vote on this it should be between, on the one hand, 'May's Deal' or. on the other hand, 'No Deal'.

 

'Remain' already eliminated in the earlier referendum.

 

 

Eliminated because they didn't know what consequences a Brexit will have

  • Haha 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
5 hours ago, webfact said:

thrown into disarray by a surprise intervention from the speaker of parliament.

It should have not been a surprise to anyone who knew the rules, especially the PM!

In fact the Speaker did not really intervene.

He quite politely informed the PM that the motion to vote a third time on the same Brexit deal must first get the Speaker's approval. And he gave advance notice that the deal must be substantially different from the Deal that had been previously voted on by parliament. If May presents the same Deal to the Speaker for approval, THEN he will intervene by denying it for a vote. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

May’s surrender deal would have been blown out of the water again anyway. Her plan has always been to Remain, but by BRINO.
Now she has no plan, what can she take to Brussels? The EU says she must have a plan to request an extension of Article 50. Even with an eleventh hour EU capitulation, it’s not certain there would be a unanimous vote for an extension.
She returns home on Friday with no plan and no extension. What next - the default is No Deal.
The govt is already preparing for it.
https://www.express.co.uk/news/uk/1102542/Brexit-news-latest-theresa-may-no-deal-eu-uk-stephen-barclay-operation-yellowhammer
No deal Brexit BOMBSHELL: No deal plan WILL be implemented if no delay agreed by Monday


Sent from my iPhone using Thaivisa Connect

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
5 hours ago, SheungWan said:

The one big lie is the Hard Brexiteer one that the referendum result = no-deal and nothing else.

BS

  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 hours ago, mrmicbkktxl said:

I  think a new referendum would be fair now that most of the people know the consequences of a brexit.In a new referendum the question should be 'stay or leave without a deal" and set a date for the brexit, for example two months after the referendum.Three years ago most of leavers didn't know the impact of a brexit,if they still vote for leave then be it

We already had that one, in effect. No need, thanks. 

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
9 minutes ago, nauseus said:

BS

 

Get ready to melt snowflakes, Brexit ain't happening!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...