Jump to content

Three young women from Chaiyaphum store incinerated in horror smash


webfact

Recommended Posts

Three young women from Chaiyaphum store incinerated in horror smash
 
7pm1.jpg
Picture: Daily News
 
Daily News reported that three people who died after a Mitsubishi Mirage hit a sugar cane truck and burst into flames this morning were all aged 23 and worked at the same store. 
 
Police arrived on the scene at 2.45 am. The accident happened on Route 202, Chaiyaphum to Bua Yai between KM markers 13 and 14 heading to Chaiyaphum. 
 
Sugar cane truck driver Bunyang Meunraksa, 47, said he had made a delivery to a sugar factory in Korat and was on his way back. Shortly after visiting a gas station he noticed a car coming at considerable speed behind him.
 
7pm.jpg
Picture: Daily News
 
He said it hit the back of his vehicle then careered off the road and burst into flames. He tried to help but the doors were locked and he could no nothing.
 
He reported the accident to the police one kilometer away but they were not in time to help. 
 
The three occupants of the car were burnt beyond recognition. 
 
Daily News later reported they were all 23 and were workers at the same well known store in Chaiyaphum.
 
They were named as Laddawan Phimphila, Sirinnapha Thongtheng and Koithip Luangjampa. 
 
Police are investigating where the ladies had been before the accident and are re-interviewing the truck driver.
 
Autopsies have been ordered. 
 
Daily News further reported that relatives of the victims were on their way to pick up the deceased. 
 
Sources: Daily News | Daily News
 
thai+visa_news.jpg
-- © Copyright Thai Visa News 2019-03-20
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 85
  • Created
  • Last Reply
2 hours ago, webfact said:

Shortly after visiting a gas station

 

He left the gas station without paying attention to the traffic coming in front of and behind him;
the little car could not avoid this big vehicle that came out under his nose.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, happyaussie said:

No taillights or tail lights obscured by low hanging cane. 

I was thinking the same thing. I see so many of these big trucks with their tail lights out or barely visible because of the low wattage or bad lenses covering them.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, manicmike68 said:

I was thinking the same thing. I see so many of these big trucks with their tail lights out or barely visible because of the low wattage or bad lenses covering them.

 

Could be no or obscured tail lights + the car driver possibly being drunk (coming from a bar at 2:45am?) + possibly texting. I'd check her phone records on that last one. Or, a 'proper' investigation would do that. Not sure it'll happen in this case. Tragic no matter the cause. RIP to the three ladies. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, happyaussie said:

No taillights or tail lights obscured by low hanging cane. 

If you read the article you will find out he made his delivery to the sugar factory, so it might be possible he was empty?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Was the car fitted with LPG ?, so many burn after an accident yet in Australia and most other countries auto shut off valves prevent gas escape.

I often wonder about the safety rules for gas fitting and wonder if they are applied by the fitters or checked by anyone.

Anyhow that’s another three added to the never ending list , so very sad.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

46 minutes ago, hansnl said:

If you read the article you will find out he made his delivery to the sugar factory, so it might be possible he was empty?

Exactly! All the accident, air-crash, forensics and crime-scene investigators in TVF, together with their superpowers (especially the ability to see and judge without ever being on the site of an incident or have all the relevant info) are so quick to vilify the truck driver. Sure, Thai drivers aren't the smartest of the bunch, but not ALL commercial vehicle drivers are bad.

 

How do we know if the car wasn't speeding? The driver texting, or just distracted, while speeding? Or perhaps they were intoxicated? Who knows? And, all things being equal, even in the dead of the night with zero illumination at the back of the truck, the car would've been able to stop/avoid the truck IF IT WAS NOT SPEEDING and was going at a speed at which it was able to stop within the distance of its headlights' range (defensive driving 101). Even if the truck did pull out in front of the car without looking, the car could still have avoided the truck if it wasn't speeding. Or at least wouldn't have burst into flames. It would take very, very high speeds for the car to smash into it AND burst into flames.

 

Still tragic, no matter how we look at it, but I just think it's too premature to point the finger at any one party at this point.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Assurancetourix said:

 

He left the gas station without paying attention to the traffic coming in front of and behind him;
the little car could not avoid this big vehicle that came out under his nose.

Please don't  traduce peoples  reputations by telling. lies about things of which you have no evidence.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Khunbilly said:

Could be no or obscured tail lights + the car driver possibly being drunk (coming from a bar at 2:45am?) + possibly texting. I'd check her phone records on that last one. Or, a 'proper' investigation would do that. Not sure it'll happen in this case. Tragic no matter the cause. RIP to the three ladies. 

Sherlock....................

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, jlwilliamsjr18 said:

My exact thoughts, if not obscured, then very likely no lights at all.  I see them often near Hua Hin with overloads, no lights and driving like mad men. 

So the girls car didn't have headlights to see a truck...?..????

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, tlandtday said:

Sounds a bit odd that a speeding car runs into the back of a truck.  Was he turning?  I guess he can't say his brakes failed in this instance.  Requires further investigation.

back of  a truck , r u joking  its a daily occurrence too fast not look

Link to comment
Share on other sites

29 minutes ago, Fred31 said:

Please don't  traduce peoples  reputations by telling. lies about things of which you have no evidence.

I may have been here for too long?
I drive almost every day and see this kind of behavior ten times, twenty times a day;
whether from trucks, coaches or light vehicles, cars, pickups, minibuses

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, hansnl said:

If you read the article you will find out he made his delivery to the sugar factory, so it might be possible he was empty?

It doesn't matter... . most of this old, broken and black smoke spitting trucks here don't have any working rear lights. and often driving less then 30 kmh. Loaded or empty... Very hard to spot them in the night. Very sad. RIP, three young lives... 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Assurancetourix said:

 

He left the gas station without paying attention to the traffic coming in front of and behind him;
the little car could not avoid this big vehicle that came out under his nose.

 

2 hours ago, Assurancetourix said:

 

He left the gas station without paying attention to the traffic coming in front of and behind him;
the little car could not avoid this big vehicle that came out under his nose.

Aw for Gods sake. Where does it say came out under his (there) nose. I do not know where a lot of you come out with so much B/S. It did not say he just pulled out of a gas station. Wait till he is fully questioned. Don't condem before you know. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, happyaussie said:

No taillights or tail lights obscured by low hanging cane. 

Read the post again... he had made the delivery and was on his way back, ie empty truck !!!

Having said that my monies on him filling up at the gas station and turning back onto the road in front of the car, he said it was speeding but if he was hardly moving after just making the entry then the car would have run into the back of him quickly with no-where to avoid him !

I'd charge the driver for triple manslaughter !!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, shaurene said:

 

Aw for Gods sake. Where does it say came out under his (there) nose. I do not know where a lot of you come out with so much B/S. It did not say he just pulled out of a gas station. Wait till he is fully questioned. Don't condem before you know. 

I so agree , all this speculation , Only thing for certain is 3 young ladies died horribly !.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.





×
×
  • Create New...