Jump to content
BANGKOK 22 April 2019 01:35
snoop1130

Macaulay Culkin laughed off Michael Jackson abuse allegations IN FRONT of late singer's daughter Paris

Recommended Posts

Macaulay Culkin laughed off Michael Jackson abuse allegations IN FRONT of late singer's daughter Paris

By KATE THOMAS

 

11265202-6833957-image-a-14_1553159636231.jpg

Making light of it? Macaulay Culkin laughed off the Michael Jackson abuse allegations in front of late star's daughter Paris Jackson

 

Macaulay Culkin has stayed quiet on the Michael Jackson sexual abuse scandal in the wake of controversial new documentary Leaving Neverland.

 

But the former Home Alone star - who stayed with Michael a dozen times between the ages of 9 and 14 and testified in the late singer's defence in his 2005 trial - has now seemingly joked about the claims during his Bunny Ears Podcast Live.

 

The 38-year-old actor referenced explosive allegations Jackson had molested Wade Robson and James Safechuck, featured in the HBO film, in front of the King of Pop's daughter Paris.

 

Macaulay, who is 20-year-old Paris' godfather, was speaking at the Largo at the Coronet in Los Angeles on Tuesday night, where he was supported by Paris and her boyfriend Gabriel Glenn.

 

Full Story: https://www.dailymail.co.uk/tvshowbiz/article-6833957/Macaulay-Culkin-laughed-Michael-Jackson-abuse-allegations-Paris.html

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I guess it possible that he didn't molest Culkin but it seems very unlikely.

  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, Curt1591 said:

But, now those "nobodies" are "somebodies". 

Sure, but I’m not envious if their claim to fame is being given a hand job by Michael Jackson ... shamoan!!

 

🤩

  • Haha 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 hours ago, Jingthing said:

It was much more than that. Did you watch the doc? Doesn't sound like it. I believe them both. 

As far as understanding Caulkin's motivations it's impossible to know. He could still be lying because he's still in love with MJ and wants to continue to protect his memory, or perhaps he wasn't ever in love with MJ so MJ knew not to risk it as he was into totally controlling the boys emotions, or not his type, or Caulkin might feel being associated as being a molestation victim does nothing for his celebrity image. Also he could be lying because if he reports the crimes now it would be admitting that he lied all that time before, even as an adult, and that would reflect poorly on him. So overall you can see there are possible motivations for Caulkin to be truthful now also not so I discount his account based on the documentary which was overwhelmingly damning. 

 

A world famous celebrity like Culkin would be untouchable ... so I've no reason to doubt his statement. Given that he's had all sorts of drug issues as a young adult it's unlikely that abuse took place and is being hidden. Paedos go for those that are vulnerable, the one's least likely to expose them ... they don't go for every kid.

 

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
 

A world famous celebrity like Culkin would be untouchable ... so I've no reason to doubt his statement. Given that he's had all sorts of drug issues as a young adult it's unlikely that abuse took place and is being hidden. Paedos go for those that are vulnerable, the one's least likely to expose them ... they don't go for every kid.

 

 

 

Perhaps. But an obvious pedo like MJ was likely went for boys that he had frequent bed sharing sleepovers with as he did with Caulkin. Either way watch the doc. Or don't because if you do you'll probably feel like most people that watched it that MJ was a monster.

 

But he wasn't a rapist. He seduced the boys and more importantly to his getting away with it he seduced the families.

 

Sent from my Lenovo A7020a48 using Thailand Forum - Thaivisa mobile app

 

 

 

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Posted (edited)
3 hours ago, Jingthing said:

But an obvious pedo like MJ

 

 

 

But an obvious alleged and unproven pedo like MJ...

 

 

 

Edited by Chelseafan
  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
8 hours ago, Jingthing said:

It was much more than that. Did you watch the doc? Doesn't sound like it. I believe them both. 

As far as understanding Caulkin's motivations it's impossible to know. He could still be lying because he's still in love with MJ and wants to continue to protect his memory, or perhaps he wasn't ever in love with MJ so MJ knew not to risk it as he was into totally controlling the boys emotions, or not his type, or Caulkin might feel being associated as being a molestation victim does nothing for his celebrity image. Also he could be lying because if he reports the crimes now it would be admitting that he lied all that time before, even as an adult, and that would reflect poorly on him. So overall you can see there are possible motivations for Caulkin to be truthful now also not so I discount his account based on the documentary which was overwhelmingly damning. 

Or the few million of hush $ he has been living off.

 

You think he like D ?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
35 minutes ago, Jingthing said:

Watch the doc.

Sent from my Lenovo A7020a48 using Thailand Forum - Thaivisa mobile app
 

I've seen it and I'm sure they have had coaching in what to say, how to react etc.

 

I'm sorry but there's no evidence whatsoever and it's very easy to beat up on a dead man who can't defend himself.

We live in a society based on evidence and fact not conjecture and hearsay...

 

 

  • Thanks 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Posted (edited)
33 minutes ago, JimmyTheMook said:

Or the few million of hush $ he has been living off.

 

You think he like D ?

It's well documented that MJ paid people off but look at it from his perspective, it's better to spend a few quid than have these "allegations" dragged out in court damaging his image. This isn't an uncommon event among celebs.

 

Do I think MJ was a fruitloop? Sure...Do I think he was a pedo?...No. If conclusive evidence comes to light then I'll change my mind. Until that point I'm not going to judge someone for their eccentric lifestyle.

 

 

 

Edited by Chelseafan
  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I've seen it and I'm sure they have had coaching in what to say, how to react etc.
 
I'm sorry but there's no evidence whatsoever and it's very easy to beat up on a dead man who can't defend himself.
We live in a society based on evidence and fact not conjecture and hearsay...
 
 
Are you a big fan of MJ?

Sent from my Lenovo A7020a48 using Thailand Forum - Thaivisa mobile app

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...