Jump to content

Bitcoin Seastead backer in battle with Thai authorities


webfact

Recommended Posts

Bitcoin Seastead backer in battle with Thai authorities

By The Thaiger

 

79977f395644b4e066fd3d9d553dda08.jpeg

 

A ‘seastead’ project, launched by an early bitcoin adopter off the coast of Phuket island in Thailand’s south is running into trouble with local government authorities.

 

The Royal Thai Navy and Phuket Maritime authorities boarded the structure on Sunday, saying that the structure violates criminal law and poses a navigation hazard.

 

‘sea-stead’, noun – a permanent settlement on a structure located in an area of sea outside the jurisdiction of any country.

 

Full story: https://thethaiger.com/hot-news/bitcoin-seastead-backer-in-battle-with-thai-authorities

 

thtthaiger.png

-- © Copyright The Thaiger 2019-04-16
Link to comment
Share on other sites

This seems like a great idea (to me).

If Thailand doesn’t want this 21st century community outside its territorial waters, I’m reasonably sure many other countries would welcome it. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Romantic and moronic at the same time...

 

Someone should suggest he build his floating community next to the controversial Chinese military base in the South China sea...

 

Both could find common ground as a rogue enterprise...????

Link to comment
Share on other sites

An interesting topic this seasteading . I'd be more concerned about the safety aspects. It has no safety colors. No markings other than a orange buoy. I didn't see any life raft/boat or safety equipment like life jackets, fire extinguishers, lights, radar reflectors etc in any of the videos/pictures. Did they issue a Notice to Mariners on the position of the structure? Does the structure comply with IMO, SOLARIS, and/or MARPOL international conventions? Dreams all start somewhere I guess. Have fun but be safe and don't be surprised when the first storm sinks your house or get sued from a fisherman who runs into it. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

A bit of a whacky idea...  Even though he's beyond 12 NM putting him beyond Thai Territorial waters - placing him in International Waters. 

 

It would seem he has internationally recognized legal rights providing he is not interfering with shipping navigation - which, without electricity / lighting he could be. 

 

That said, how deep is the seabed for him to secure his structure - it may be too shallow for shipping anyway. 

 

Quote

But local maritime authorities argue that the claim that the seastead is built on international waters is untrue. 

 

If the structure is 12 NM (22.2km) from the Nearest Coast line - then it's in International Waters - no debate there and easy to measure. 

 

 

Personally - China's encroachment on the South China Sea & Spratley Island area is a far greater concern for the whole region than 1 guy who's a little nuts building a seastead.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

International Waters blah blah blah -  Yer right - as if that's the only thing that matters...

 

He is located in one of Thailand's Thailand Exclusive Economic Zone (EEZ).

 

This gent would not be the first to be burnt assuming that being in international waters he was outside Thailand's field of influence - he isn't.

 

The Thai have flexed their musles before with these kind of issues. It will not end good for him if he does not comply with a Thai gun boats instructions, as in the Mike Hatcher Australia Thai incident.

 

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, richard_smith237 said:

 

Personally - China's encroachment on the South China Sea & Spratley Island area is a far greater concern for the whole region than 1 guy who's a little nuts building a seastead.

True, but does he have an air craft carrier, own most of the USA debt and command a billion shouting tourists?  These are key factors when planning marine squatting.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, YTP said:

Why would you want to maroon yourself in the middle of the ocean, in a 15sqm floating can, with a Thai woman and no escape?

Try to listen to her in the video they made was enough for me. Imagine a life with her babbling away and no escape. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 hours ago, richard_smith237 said:

 

If the structure is 12 NM (22.2km) from the Nearest Coast line - then it's in International Waters - no debate there and easy to measure. 

 

 

In International waters BUT also in Thailands Contiguous Zone:

 

"The contiguous zone is a band of water extending farther from the outer edge of the territorial sea to up to 24 nautical miles (44.4 km; 27.6 mi) from the baseline, within which a state can exert limited control for the purpose of preventing or punishing "infringement of its customs, fiscal, immigration or sanitary laws and regulations within its territory or territorial sea"

 

......which indeed extends to 24 NM, as promulgated in 1995:

 

"1. The contiguous zone of the Kingdom of Thailand is the area beyond and adjacent to the territorial sea of the Kingdom of Thailand, the breadth of which extends to twenty-four nautical miles measured from the baselines used for measuring the breadth of the territorial sea.

 

2. In the contiguous zone, the Kingdom of Thailand shall act as necessary to:(a) Prevent violation of customs, fiscal, immigration or sanitary laws and regulations, which will or may be committed within the Kingdom or its territorial sea;(b) Punish violation of the laws and regulations defined in (a), which is committed within the Kingdom or its territorial sea.

 

Proclaimed on the 14th day of August, B.E. 2538, being the forty-ninth year of the present reign."

 

 

The zone where things start to get......murky.

 

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 hours ago, neeray said:

This seems like a great idea (to me).

If Thailand doesn’t want this 21st century community outside its territorial waters, I’m reasonably sure many other countries would welcome it. 

Each to their own, of course. I respect that the situation appeals to you, but I'm sure I'd hate it and would feel more like I was in prison than actually having a life. This is definitely not for everyone. It would be interesting to run a survey in this thread to see how many people would give that lifestyle a try. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

We already have acro

14 hours ago, Inn Between said:

nd would feel more like I was in prison than actually having a life.

True, and if you want to live out in the ocean, we already have cruise ships you can live on all year round.

On Symphony of the Seas , the largest cruise ship in the world, you can retire and live your life on the ship for a yearly cost of $120 000 , all inclusive.  Not cheap but if you have the money, why not?

That means luxury at sea and not inside a "prison" where you can't go nowhere, 

 

Coast-Guard-searching-for-cruise-perform

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 hours ago, Inn Between said:

Each to their own, of course. I respect that the situation appeals to you, but I'm sure I'd hate it and would feel more like I was in prison than actually having a life. This is definitely not for everyone. It would be interesting to run a survey in this thread to see how many people would give that lifestyle a try. 

Reliable internet connections??

Cost of going to the shops for provisions, boat required, car maintained on land, medical emergencies??

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.




×
×
  • Create New...