Jump to content

NACC lifts water loan misconduct charges against Yingluck


rooster59

Recommended Posts

NACC lifts water loan misconduct charges against Yingluck

tewit kemtong

 

6b67db1befabf55746ed5e50f453f670_small.jpg

 

BANGKOK, 20 April 2019 (NNT) -The National Anti-Corruption Commission has lifted misconduct charges against former prime minister Yingluck Shinawatra involving an executive decree for water management loans, due to lack of evidence.

 

NACC Secretary General Worawit Sookboon announced on Thursday that the NACC had resolved to lift the misconduct charges against Yingluck and her cabinet which had issued the executive decree for the acquisition of 350 billion baht in loans to finance the water management projects in 2012.

 

The NACC had set up an investigative committee which had compiled pieces of evidence and followed the rulings of the Constitutional Court delivered earlier that year on the executive decree which provided for the Ministry of Finance to borrow funds to finance the implementation of water management projects and relevant plans primarily designed to maintain national economic stability and prevent public disasters in accordance with the constitution’s Article 184, considered an inevitable emergency case, prompting the NACC to reach the unanimous decision to lift the misconduct charges due to lack of substantial evidence.

 

Nevertheless, the NACC is currently in the process of investigating whether the Terms Of Reference for the implementation of the water management projects might have rendered undue profits to certain contractors or might have violated the 2007 constitution.

 

nnt_logo.jpg

-- © Copyright nnt 2019-04-21

Link to comment
Share on other sites

22 minutes ago, Odysseus123 said:

They are on the back foot a little bit.I wonder why?

 

"Lack of evidence" has never impeded their immense enthusiasm for their favourite pastime before-persecuting their political rivals/enemies through the courts.

The modus operandi may well be the same as last time: first start by exonerating her from some charge before convicting her for another one. It allows them to look fair and neutral.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

Hmmm. Didn't this involve the intended awarding of contracts to a Korean company, without any competitive or open tendering process? A company that was just before the award visited by Yingluck's fugitive brother for whom they rolled out the red carpet? And wasn't this all to happen without EIA's? Remember a certain scientific genius in the government threatening environment protesters and calling them garbage? Wasn't that also connected to this?

 

But as the man says, maybe no real evidence to bring charges.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.




×
×
  • Create New...