Jump to content

Thaksin given 3-year imprisonment for Exim Bank’s loan to Myanmar


webfact

Recommended Posts

Thaksin given 3-year imprisonment for Exim Bank’s loan to Myanmar

 

Thaksin.png

 

The Supreme Court’s Criminal Division for Holders of Political Office has sentenced fugitive former prime minister Thaksin Shinawatra to three years in prison without suspension after finding him guilty of malfeasance in office for approving a 4-billion-baht low interest loan from the Thai Exim Bank to Myanmar for the purchase of telecom equipment and services from his family-owned company, Shin Satellite.

 

The court also issued a warrant for the arrest of Thaksin who has been in self-exile since 2008.

 

After his overthrow in a military coup in 2006, a special Assets Scrutiny Committee was set up by the junta-appointed government to investigate Thaksin’s massive wealth and his alleged conflicts of interest which may have enabled him to amass considerable wealth.  The Exim Bank’s loan to Myanmar is just one of about a dozen cases investigated by the panel and, subsequently, by the National Anti-Corruption Commission.

 

Full story: https://www.thaipbsworld.com/thaksin-given-3-year-imprisonment-for-exim-banks-loan-to-myanmar/

 

thaipbs.jpg

-- © Copyright Thai PBS 2019-04-24
Link to comment
Share on other sites

i'll admit i'm biased, but I really struggle to see how most of the charges are as serious as they are making out, the exim bank is supposed to loan money so neighbouring countries can but thai goods and services

 

conflict of interest? possibly, but it's also very possible that the conflict of interest was acknowledged, disclosed, etc

Link to comment
Share on other sites

46 minutes ago, perthuniversity said:

i'll admit i'm biased, but I really struggle to see how most of the charges are as serious as they are making out, the exim bank is supposed to loan money so neighbouring countries can but thai goods and services

 

conflict of interest? possibly, but it's also very possible that the conflict of interest was acknowledged, disclosed, etc

Conflict of interest, yes totally, read the full details, easy to find all published in detail before.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Probably has a lot to do with the Pheu Thai party insisting it has the last election's majority to form and head the new government, so here comes the added warning and deterrent to anyone who thought that Thaksin will be brought home soon... 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

in my book overthrowing an elected government was treason, punishable by death, oh sorry wrong country. wonder how many years this lot would get, ha ha the first thing this lot done was make an act of parliament protecting any wrong doings they might be part of.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This poor bloke can't win a trick. Must have "killed a Chinaman", a common saying in Oz when you are down on your luck.

 

2006 until 2019? Must have been very careful in gathering evidence. I heard they even spoke to the cleaner in the bank building?

 

I suppose when his team wins the current election and then after the revolution, he will pass a law to fix everything.

 

Hope he passes a law about wearing watches of dead mates?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, webfact said:

The Supreme Court’s Criminal Division for Holders of Political Office has sentenced fugitive former prime minister Thaksin Shinawatra to three years in prison without suspension after finding him guilty of malfeasance in office for approving a 4-billion-baht low interest loan from the Thai Exim Bank to Myanmar for the purchase of telecom equipment and services from his family-owned company, Shin Satellite.

He's not even here in Thailand anymore:cheesy::cheesy::cheesy::cheesy::cheesy:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, perthuniversity said:

i'll admit i'm biased, but I really struggle to see how most of the charges are as serious as they are making out, the exim bank is supposed to loan money so neighbouring countries can but thai goods and services

 

conflict of interest? possibly, but it's also very possible that the conflict of interest was acknowledged, disclosed, etc

The loan required Myanmar to buy services from Shin Satellite a subsidiary of Shin Corp, which is own by his family. 

 

There are numerous cases where Thaksin use his position to get ministries to buy stuff from  company his family owns, other examples include police force buying computers.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, perthuniversity said:

i'll admit i'm biased, but I really struggle to see how most of the charges are as serious as they are making out, the exim bank is supposed to loan money so neighbouring countries can but thai goods and services

 

conflict of interest? possibly, but it's also very possible that the conflict of interest was acknowledged, disclosed, etc

Not sure, the loan was to buy telecommunications equipment from his company, so a definite conflict of interest. Was the loan ever paid back? I am not sure. But lending that kind on money to a military dictatorship that was under UN sanctions to purchase equipment from your company is highly unethical. Ordering the loan to be made when the bank did not want to, basically amounts to theft if it was not fully repaid. A three-year sentence when he made millions of dollars seems like a very lite sentence. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, phutoie2 said:

yes , not a long read.  It was on the fiction shelf at Asia Books.

The replies seem to be totally ignorant of the facts. The corruption charge is Taksins terms of giving Burma the loan were that they would purchase his own companiy's satellite equipment. Also, he bypassed Parliament in authorising the loan. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

32 minutes ago, mike324 said:

The loan required Myanmar to buy services from Shin Satellite a subsidiary of Shin Corp, which is own by his family. 

 

There are numerous cases where Thaksin use his position to get ministries to buy stuff from  company his family owns, other examples include police force buying computers.

Yes, he misled the police force into believing other computers were inferior as his had the best solitaire games.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, Chang_paarp said:

Is the statute of limitations running out on the other warrants?

 

Speaking of statute of limitations, how long ago was this offence? And is there a statute of limitations on this type of offence?

This was filed in 2008, two years after the act.  Therefore well within the SoL (if there even is one for corruption of this kind - I am not sure).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, perthuniversity said:

i'll admit i'm biased, but I really struggle to see how most of the charges are as serious as they are making out, the exim bank is supposed to loan money so neighbouring countries can but thai goods and services

 

conflict of interest? possibly, but it's also very possible that the conflict of interest was acknowledged, disclosed, etc

It certainly was not acknowledged.  It was extremely shady to say the least.  There is no "possibly" about it.  Think about it, the Prime Minister of a nation authorising / ordering a government bank to give a low interest loan to a cruel military dictatorship, under several UN sanctions, for it to buy equipment from his personal company, thereby enriching him greatly.

 

Why is that only "possibly" a conflict of interest?  It couldn't be a clearer breach.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The article in Thai pbs lacks precision, as often. The part of the loan that was later used to buy Shin Corps products was 400 Million, accordind to the ASC. What was the cost of the reduced interest rate for a 400 Million loan over 3 years? 10% (40 million), 20% (80 million)?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.




×
×
  • Create New...