Jump to content
BANGKOK 26 May 2019 16:48
webfact

U.S. pulls staff from Iraq, says Iran gave 'blessing' for tanker attacks

Recommended Posts

U.S. pulls staff from Iraq, says Iran gave 'blessing' for tanker attacks

By John Davison and Mark Hosenball

 

2019-05-15T155652Z_1_LYNXNPEF4E1BP_RTROPTP_4_USA-IRAN-IRAQ-EMBASSY.JPG

FILE PHOTO: U.S. Secretary of State Mike Pompeo and his wife Susan walk at the U.S. Embassy compound toward the heli pad to catch a helicopter that will transport them to the International Airport, in Baghdad, Iraq, January 9, 2019. Andrew Caballero-Reynolds/Pool via REUTERS/File Photo

 

BAGHDAD/WASHINGTON (Reuters) - Helicopters ferried U.S. staff from the American embassy in Baghdad on Wednesday out of apparent concern about perceived threats from Iran, which U.S. sources believe encouraged Sunday's attacks on four oil tankers in the Gulf.

 

The sabotage of the tankers, for which no one has claimed responsibility, and Saudi Arabia's announcement on Tuesday that armed drones hit two of its oil pumping stations have raised concerns Washington and Tehran may be inching toward conflict.

 

A U.S. government source said American security experts believe Iran gave its "blessing" to tanker attacks, which hit two Saudi crude oil tankers, a UAE-flagged fuel bunker barge and a Norwegian-registered oil products tanker off Fujeirah near the Strait of Hormuz.

 

The source said the United States believes Iran's role was one of actively encouraging militants but indicated the United States does not now have evidence that Iranian personnel played any direct operational role.

 

Iran's Foreign Ministry has called the tanker attacks "worrisome and dreadful" and called for an investigation.

 

There has been a marked increase in U.S.-Iranian tensions since U.S. President Donald Trump's decision to try to cut off all of Iran's oil exports and to designate its Revolutionary Guards as a "foreign terrorist organization."

 

Trump, who last year abandoned the 2015 international nuclear accord with Iran, believes the economic pressure will force Tehran to accept more stringent limitations on its nuclear and missile programs as well as on its support for proxies in Iraq, Syria and Yemen.

 

U.S. SHRINKS DIPLOMATIC PRESENCE

U.S. Secretary of State Mike Pompeo made a surprise visit to Baghdad last week after U.S. intelligence showed Iran-backed Shi'ite militias positioning rockets near bases housing U.S. forces, according to two Iraqi security sources.

 

Pompeo told Iraq's top brass to keep the militias, which are expanding their power in Iraq and now form part of its security apparatus, in check, the sources said. If not, the United States would respond with force.

 

Helicopters took off throughout the day from the vast U.S. embassy compound near the Tigris River in Baghdad, carrying non-emergency staff out, according to an Iraqi source and a diplomatic source inside Baghdad's fortified Green Zone.

 

The Iraqi source said U.S. staff were headed for a military base at Baghdad airport. A U.S. official told Reuters late on Wednesday that the evacuation was complete.

 

Trump is sending an aircraft carrier group, B-52 bombers and Patriot missiles to the Middle East to counter what the United States calls a heightened threat from Iran to U.S. soldiers and interests in the region.

 

Iran described the U.S. moves as "psychological warfare", and a British commander cast doubt on U.S. military concerns about threats to its roughly 5,000 soldiers in Iraq, who have been helping Iraqi security forces fight Islamic State.

 

The U.S. State Department said employees at both the U.S. embassy in Baghdad and its consulate in Erbil, capital of the semi-autonomous Kurdistan region, were being pulled out immediately due to safety concerns.

 

It was unclear how many were affected, and there was no word on any specific threat. Visa services were suspended at the heavily-fortified U.S. missions.

 

Germany, which has 160 soldiers in Iraq, and the Netherlands which has 169 military and civilian staff, suspended military training operations, citing regional tensions.

 

'DANGEROUS SITUATION'

The attack on the tankers near the Strait of Hormuz, through which one fifth of the world's oil consumption flows, appeared designed to test the resolve of the United States and its Sunni Muslim allies without triggering a war, analysts said.

 

"This is a pin-prick event, a little needle-like jab at the maritime trade going into the Strait of Hormuz," said Gerry Northwood, chairman of risk management and security firm MAST.

 

Both the United States and Iran have said they do not want war, and Iraqi Prime Minister Adel Abdul Mahdi said on Tuesday he had indications "things will end well" despite the rhetoric.

 

Iraq is one of few countries with close ties to both the United States and Iran. It has said it will keep strong ties with Iran, and also with the United States and Arab neighbours, some of whom, such as Saudi Arabia, consider Tehran a rival.

 

The United States, which had a large troop presence in Iraq from 2003-2011 after invading to topple dictator Saddam Hussein, sent troops back there in 2014 to help fight Islamic State.

 

Iran has close ties to powerful Iraqi political parties and supports powerful Shi'ite militia groups.

 

"I think we are now in a quite dangerous situation where a miscalculation by either side could lead us into conflict," U.S. Senator Chris Coons, a Democrat on the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, told CNN in an interview on Wednesday.

 

(Reporting by John Davison and Ahmed Rasheed in Baghdad, Raya Jalabi in Erbil and Mark Hosenball in Washington; Additional reporting by Susan Heavey, Makini Brice and Phil Stewart in Washington, Babak Dehghanpisheh in Geneva; Tassilo Hummel and Sabine Siebold in Berlin; and Anthony Deutsch and Toby Sterling in Amsterdam; Writing by Arshad Mohammed; Editing by Grant McCool)

 

reuters_logo.jpg

-- © Copyright Reuters 2019-05-16

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, quandow said:

If Trump handles this problem like he does everything else, then we're screwed. He won't (or can't due to attention span and/or words too big?) read security briefings, he won't listen to his advisors, he chooses behavior that will make his "reality TV star status" look good.

 

What....like the North Korea situation? Oh, wait....the sky didn't fall then. And man, there was much more trash talking going on, even. Notice the same absence of any major ground troop deployed to either front? Yeah. That.

 

Trump's handling of international affairs is crude, simplistic and often inane. That aside, no new major military entanglements to date, and other than talk, it was pretty much just the cruise missile attack on Syria.

 

Trump is a bully. Bullies aren't usually very brave.

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 hours ago, OneMoreFarang said:

"U.S. pulls staff from Iraq" Good! They should pull all staff from Iraq and all staff from the whole region, especially their military. They should all go home and stay home.

The USA started enough wars. No more!

They should fix their local problems. They have enough of them.

Not sure you understand the situation. These are Embassy and consulate staff issuing visas to people who are either escaping the conflict or going to study abroad, amongst other things. Why would you not want them there?

  • Like 1
  • Confused 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
5 hours ago, webfact said:

American security experts believe Iran gave its "blessing" to tanker attacks,

 

5 hours ago, webfact said:

United States believes Iran's role was one of actively encouraging militants

Believe/s??  Many people also believe in the Tooth Fairy, but there exists no evidence.

 

5 hours ago, webfact said:

U.S. intelligence showed Iran-backed Shi'ite militias positioning rockets near bases housing U.S. forces, according to two Iraqi security sources.

What no WMD's this time or troops massing on the border with Saudi Arabia ready to strike at any moment (even though the CIA said there was no evidence at all, even from spy satelites etc and no one to this day has found the WMD's.

 

Bolton and his "crazies" (the neo-cons) would be better suited to writing fairy tales or Marvel comics (apologies Marvel, I know your stories are slightly believable)!

 

In those famous words that have rung through the century "Yankee go home"!

  • Like 2
  • Confused 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...