Jump to content
BANGKOK 16 July 2019 11:29
webfact

Flynn detailed attempts to obstruct Russia probe - U.S. court filing

Recommended Posts

23 minutes ago, cbtstorm said:

so we are still on about russian collusion  by trump team? or can we put that to rest now?

If Mueller had something  illegal he would have moved on it and filed charges.

 

 

 

Read the report, Mueller explains precisely why he has not pressed charges against Trump.

 

Manafort, Stone, Cohen and others are a different matter, as are the 14 indictments within Mueller’s report.

 

Do try to keep up.

  • Thanks 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 5/17/2019 at 4:03 AM, JusticeGB said:

I thought that many Asian Countries were corrupt but obviously the USA beats them all. A 2 year investigation by Mueller didn't reveal any collusion only that Trump is a habitual liar. But the Mueller investigation was based on a flawed document that may have involved Obama! 

The two year Mueller investigation documented how Russia interfered with the US election and how the Trump attempted to obstruct the investigation.

 

The investigation is based on the conclusion of all intelligence agencies that Russia interfered in the election, Trump's embrace of this interference ("Russia, if you're listening...., " "I love wikileaks", etc), and the Trump campaign staffers having criminal links to Russia and lying about their contacts.

  • Thanks 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 5/17/2019 at 12:14 AM, TopDeadSenter said:

Still beating this dead 4 legged quadruped? While most people have moved on to the delicious new and most important phase of the Russia collusion hoax ie the hunters becoming the hunted. I expect Mueller, Comey, those that paid for the fantasy Steele report which was known to be nonsense by the FBI, and the rest of the swamp beasts to be behind bars for spying on Trump and launching an illegal investigation/soft coup attempt in the not too distant future. A much more exciting development than still harping on about the collusion that wasn't.

Still hoping for a fascist political system?  While Attorney General Barr does a passable impersonation of Himmler, the officers of the Justice Department have sworn allegiance to the constitution, not to Trump.  It's not Trump's SS yet.  The investigation was legal and necessary.  Investigating the investigators will simply keep the issues of Trump's bad judgment and crooked friends in the news.

 

On 5/17/2019 at 3:06 AM, Boon Mee said:

Flynn was set up by Sally Yates. Gonna be real interesting as the truth comes out. These Deep State characters are already turning on each other. 

Pure fantasy.  The only characters turning on each other are past and present Trump officials.

  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 5/17/2019 at 7:26 AM, riclag said:

But yet , after knowing this, Mueller concluded  of the probe  "no additional indictments"

Actually Mueller followed Justice Department policy of not indicting a sitting President, but made it very clear that there are political remedies for the obstruction he documented.

  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
42 minutes ago, cbtstorm said:

oh I thought the democrats are trying to drag this russian collusion conspiracy to 2020.

what exactly would land Trump in prison? do you have some secret info? something Muellers team missed? 

 

 

The Russian conspiracy is not the issue in question. It's about obstruction of justice.

  • Thanks 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
53 minutes ago, cbtstorm said:

oh I thought the democrats are trying to drag this russian collusion conspiracy to 2020.

what exactly would land Trump in prison? do you have some secret info? something Muellers team missed? 

 

 

Guess this( ?) Can’t get by the not indicting a sitting potus lol

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
11 minutes ago, bristolboy said:

The Russian conspiracy is not the issue in question. It's about obstruction of justice.

so the  false narrative was created and investigated with the help of some fraudulently obtained fisa warrants so that some obstruction claims can be made when the original story doesnt quite pan out.  ok

now its going to back fire on all the perpetrators.

  • Haha 2
  • Confused 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, cbtstorm said:

so the  false narrative was created and investigated with the help of some fraudulently obtained fisa warrants so that some obstruction claims can be made when the original story doesnt quite pan out.  ok

now its going to back fire on all the perpetrators.

Please tell us where you get this hogwash from?

  • Thanks 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, Tug said:

Guess this( ?) Can’t get by the not indicting a sitting potus lol

if ya knew that going in, then the investigation was all about entrapping for an obstruction charge for hopes at impeachment.

clever but an utter failure.

  • Haha 1
  • Confused 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 minutes ago, cbtstorm said:

if ya knew that going in, then the investigation was all about entrapping for an obstruction charge for hopes at impeachment.

clever but an utter failure.

Erm no.

 

But nice Non Sequitur.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 minutes ago, Chomper Higgot said:

Please tell us where you get this hogwash from?

since you know a sitting president cannot be indicted and collusion does not equal to crime, why would you spend 2 years investigating if not to entrap for an obstruction charge. the goal along. 

prosecutors are known for doing this. most masic method, find a reason to investigate, you'll find something or another and if not go for obstruction.

 

game over, next we find out how this all got constructed. 

 

  • Confused 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, cbtstorm said:

since you know a sitting president cannot be indicted and collusion does not equal to crime, why would you spend 2 years investigating if not to entrap for an obstruction charge. the goal along. 

prosecutors are known for doing this. most masic method, find a reason to investigate, you'll find something or another and if not go for obstruction.

 

game over, next we find out how this all got constructed. 

 

No please do tell us where you are getting your misinformed nonsense from?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
11 minutes ago, Chomper Higgot said:

No please do tell us where you are getting your misinformed nonsense from?

easy just take off your 2016 tds filled spectacles, you'll see it clearly. turn off msnbs or whatever rag you read. think about it from opposing view point 

and evaluate your position and it's lack of accomplishment to date.

Eitherway tables have turned. try keeping up.

I tried to find an overview for ya, I think this will suffice but only as an intro.

https://thenationalsentinel.com/2019/05/17/treason-docs-prove-deep-state-hacks-obama-comey-brennan-and-clapper-aided-russian-efforts-to-divide-americans-with-spygate/

  • Haha 2
  • Confused 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...