Jump to content
BANGKOK 20 May 2019 06:21
rooster59

Defiant Iran says it can 'easily' hit U.S. ships, works to counter sanctions

Recommended Posts

Defiant Iran says it can 'easily' hit U.S. ships, works to counter sanctions

 

800x800 (4).jpg

FILE PHOTO: Iran's Foreign Minister Mohammad Javad Zarif sits for an interview with Reuters in New York, New York, U.S. April 24, 2019. REUTERS/Carlo Allegri/File Photo

 

DUBAI (Reuters) - Iran said on Friday it could "easily" hit U.S. warships in the Gulf, the latest in days of saber rattling between Washington and Tehran, while its top diplomat worked to counter U.S. sanctions and salvage a nuclear deal denounced by President Donald Trump.

 

Tensions have risen in recent days, with concerns about a potential U.S.-Iran conflict. Earlier this week, the United States pulled some diplomatic staff from its embassy in Baghdad following weekend attacks on four oil tankers in the Gulf.

 

"Even our short-range missiles can easily reach (U.S.) warships in the Persian Gulf," Mohammad Saleh Jokar, the deputy for parliamentary affairs of the elite Revolutionary Guards (IRGC), was quoted by Fars news agency as saying.

 

"America cannot afford the costs of a new war, and the country is in a bad situation in terms of manpower and social conditions," he added.

 

Washington has increased economic sanctions and built up its military presence in the region, accusing Iran of threats to U.S. troops and interests. Tehran has described those steps as "psychological warfare" and a "political game".

 

In Washington, a senior administration official said the United States is "sitting by the phone" but has heard no message yet from Iran that it is willing to accept Trump's overtures for direct talks.

 

"We think they should de-escalate and come to negotiations," the official, who declined to be identified, told a small group of reporters.

 

Trump has urged Iran's leadership to hold talks over its nuclear programme and regional influence amid rising tensions between the two countries that has fanned fears of armed conflict after the United States deployed an aircraft carrier group to the region.

 

Iranian army chief Major General Abdolrahim Mousavi vowed: "If the enemy miscalculates and commits a strategic error, it will receive a response which will make it regret (its action)," the semi-official news agency Mehr reported.

 

Senior lawmaker Heshmatollah Falahatpisheh called on Twitter for an Iran-U.S. "red desk" to help prevent a war.

 

"Top authorities in Iran and America have rejected a war, but third parties are in a hurry to destroy a large part of the world. A red desk should be set up in Iraq or Qatar with officials from the two sides ... to manage tensions," said Falahatpisheh, head of parliament’s national security committee.

 

Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei said this week Tehran would not negotiate another nuclear deal after Washington last year quit a 2015 international pact that put curbs on Iran's potential pathway to build a nuclear bomb in exchange for the lifting of international sanctions.

 

Trump believes the economic pressure will force Tehran to accept tougher restrictions on its nuclear and missile programs and on its support for proxies in Iraq, Syria and Yemen. He has said publicly he wants to pursue diplomacy after withdrawing from the deal and moving to cut all Iranian oil exports.

 

'SUPPORTIVE STATEMENTS' NOT ENOUGH

 

Foreign Minister Mohammad Javad Zarif, on a visit to Japan and China, said the international community and remaining signatories of the nuclear deal should act to save the accord as "supportive statements" are not enough.

 

Last week, Iran notified the five remaining signatories that it would reduce some commitments under the accord.

Tehran has asked the other signatories, including Germany, Britain and France, to help protect its economy from U.S. sanctions.

 

"Safeguarding the (nuclear accord) is possible through practical measures, and not only through supportive statements," Zarif was quoted as saying by the state news agency IRNA.

 

"If the international community feels that this (nuclear) accord is a valuable achievement, then it should take practical steps just like Iran does," Zarif said on Iranian state television. "The meaning of practical steps is fully clear: Iran's economic relations should be normalised."

 

Iran's economy is expected to shrink for the second year running and inflation could reach 40 percent, an International Monetary Fund senior official said last month, as the country copes with the impact of tighter U.S. sanctions.

 

The curbs under the nuclear deal were aimed at extending the time Iran would need to produce a nuclear bomb, if it chose to, to a year from roughly 2-3 months.

 

The United States and the U.N. nuclear watchdog believe Iran had a nuclear weapons programme that it abandoned. Tehran denies ever having had one.

 

reuters_logo.jpg

-- © Copyright Reuters 2019-05-18
  • Haha 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Possibly so but in the long run not such a good idea let us all hope that doesent happen

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, ThaiFelix said:

What is the point of having talks when history has proven repeatedly that agreements mean nothing to the US??

 

Would going to war be preferable, then?

  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
9 hours ago, rooster59 said:

"Even our short-range missiles can easily reach (U.S.) warships in the Persian Gulf,"

This is one of the political conundrums for the US.

Foreign fully loaded and armed warships are free to navigate the Hormuz Strait.

That includes Iran's right to sail Iranian-flagged missile-armed ships (regardless of whether the ships are designed as warships or commercial carriers) through the strait. Further complications might arise with unflagged or surrogate-flagged armed ships. One attack by any vessel and the US will assume the high-ground for quick retribution against Iran, ie., destruction of its naval sea ports. The "shoot first and ask questions later" policy that I'm sure Bolton would favor.

What's needed is a multi-nation treaty to demilitarize the strait (aside from some provision to protect against legitimate piracy). But with the US engaged in a policy of economic blockade and regime change in Iran, that's not going to happen.

  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
26 minutes ago, roquefort said:

A little country? You mean like Vietnam?

 

Iran has 500,000 under arms and the 14th strongest military in the world. Hardly little.

 

First rule of war. Never underestimate your enemy. 

Indeed.  Another cool adage is, "That which inhibits me also inhibits my enemy".

 

Iran's forces, gear, capabilities and limitations, are well documented by the US, and others.

 

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 minutes ago, 55Jay said:

Indeed.  Another cool adage is, "That which inhibits me also inhibits my enemy".

 

Iran's forces, gear, capabilities and limitations, are well documented by the US, and others.

 

Another cool adage is "always have an exit plan" or at least acknowledging the Clausewitzian wisdom that "War is a continuation of politics by other means."

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 hours ago, ThaiFelix said:

What is the point of having talks when history has proven repeatedly that agreements mean nothing to the US??

Point would be willingness to deescalate 

  • Thanks 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...