Jump to content
BANGKOK 17 June 2019 02:34
webfact

Trump, Saudi Arabia warn Iran against Middle East conflict

Recommended Posts

Trump, Saudi Arabia warn Iran against Middle East conflict

By Marwa Rashad and Stephen Kalin

 

2019-05-19T120356Z_4_LYNXNPEF4I00X_RTROPTP_4_SAUDI-OIL-EMIRATES-TANKER-ECONOMY.JPG

FILE PHOTO: A technical staff is seen at the Port of Fujairah, United Arab Emirates, May 13, 2019. REUTERS/Satish Kumar

 

RIYADH (Reuters) - U.S. President Donald Trump issued a new threat to Tehran on Sunday, tweeting that a conflict would be the "official end" of Iran, as Saudi Arabia warned it stood ready to respond with "all strength" and said it was up to Iran to avoid war.

 

The heightened rhetoric follows last week's attacks on Saudi oil assets and the firing of a rocket on Sunday into Baghdad's heavily fortified "Green Zone" that exploded near the U.S. embassy.

 

"If Iran wants to fight, that will be the official end of Iran. Never threaten the United States again!"Trump said in a tweet without elaborating.

 

A U.S. State Department official said the rocket attack in Baghdad did not hit a U.S.-inhabited facility and produced no casualties nor any significant damage. No claims of responsibility had been made, but the United States was taking the incident "very seriously."

 

"We have made clear over the past two weeks and again underscore that attacks on U.S. personnel and facilities will not be tolerated and will be responded to in a decisive manner," the official said in an emailed statement. "We will hold Iran responsible if any such attacks are conducted by its proxy militia forces or elements of such forces, and will respond to Iran accordingly."

 

Riyadh, which emphasized that it does not want a war, has accused Tehran of ordering Tuesday's drone strikes on two oil pumping stations in the kingdom, claimed by Yemen's Iran-aligned Houthi group. Two days earlier, four vessels, including two Saudi oil tankers, were sabotaged off the coast of the United Arab Emirates.

 

In response, countries of the Gulf Cooperation Council (GCC) began "enhanced security patrols" in the international waters of the Arabian Gulf area on Saturday, the U.S. Navy's Bahrain-based Fifth Fleet said on Sunday.

 

Iran has denied involvement in either incident, which come as Washington and the Islamic Republic spar over sanctions and the U.S. military presence in the region, raising concerns about a potential U.S.-Iran conflict.

 

"The kingdom of Saudi Arabia does not want a war in the region nor does it seek that," Minister of State for Foreign Affairs Adel al-Jubeir told a news conference on Sunday.

 

"It will do what it can to prevent this war and at the same time it reaffirms that in the event the other side chooses war, the kingdom will respond with all force and determination, and it will defend itself and its interests."

 

Saudi Arabia's King Salman on Sunday invited Gulf and Arab leaders to convene emergency summits in Mecca on May 30 to discuss implications of the attacks.

 

"The current critical circumstances entail a unified Arab and Gulf stance towards the besetting challenges and risks," the UAE foreign ministry said in a statement.

 

The U.S. Navy's Fifth Fleet said in its statement about increased maritime patrols that GCC countries were "specifically increasing communication and coordination with each other in support of regional naval cooperation and maritime security operations in the Arabian Gulf," with navies and coast guards working with the U.S. Navy.

 

Saudi Arabia's Sunni Muslim ally the UAE has not blamed anyone for the tanker sabotage operation, pending an investigation. No-one has claimed responsibility, but two U.S. government sources said last week that U.S. officials believed Iran had encouraged the Houthi group or Iraq-based Shi'ite militias to carry it out.

 

The drone strike on oil pumping stations, which Riyadh said did not disrupt output or exports, was claimed by the Houthis, who have been battling a Saudi-led military coalition in a war in Yemen since 2015.

 

The Houthi-controlled SABA news agency said on Sunday, citing a military source from the group, that targeting Aramco's installations last week was the beginning of coming military operations against 300 vital military targets.

 

Targets include vital military headquarters and facilities in the United Arab Emirates, Saudi Arabia, as well as their bases in Yemen, the source told SABA.

The head of the Houthis' Supreme Revolutionary Committee, Mohammed Ali al-Houthi, derided Riyadh's call to convene Arab summits, saying in a Twitter post that they "only know how to support war and destruction".

 

A Norwegian insurers' report seen by Reuters said Iran's Revolutionary Guards were "highly likely" to have facilitated the attack on vessels near the UAE's Fujairah emirate, a main bunkering hub lying just outside the Strait of Hormuz.

 

SAUDI PRINCE CALLS POMPEO

Iranian Foreign Minister Mohammad Javad Zarif has dismissed the possibility of war erupting, saying Tehran did not want conflict and no country had the "illusion it can confront Iran". This stance was echoed by the head of Iran's elite Revolutionary Guards on Sunday.

 

"We are not pursuing war but we are also not afraid of war," Major General Hossein Salami was cited as saying by the semi-official news agency Tasnim.

 

Washington has tightened economic sanctions against Iran, trying to cut Tehran's oil exports to zero, and beefed up the U.S. military presence in the Gulf in response to what it said were Iranian threats to United States troops and interests.

 

Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman discussed regional developments, including efforts to strengthen security and stability, in a phone call with U.S. Secretary of State Mike Pompeo, the Saudi Media Ministry tweeted on Sunday.

 

"We want peace and stability in the region but we will not sit on our hands in light of the continuing Iranian attack," Jubeir said. "The ball is in Iran's court and it is up to Iran to determine what its fate will be."

 

He said the crew of an Iranian oil tanker that had been towed to Saudi Arabia early this month after a request for help due to engine trouble were still in the kingdom receiving the "necessary care". The crew are 24 Iranians and two Bangladeshis.

 

Saudi Arabia and Shi'ite Iran are arch-adversaries in the Middle East, backing opposite sides in several regional wars. In a sign of the heightened tension, Exxon Mobil evacuated foreign staff from an oilfield in neighbouring Iraq.

 

Bahrain on Saturday warned its citizens against travel to Iraq and Iran and asked those already there to return. The U.S. Federal Aviation Administration has issued an advisory to U.S. commercial airliners flying over the waters of the Gulf and the Gulf of Oman to exercise caution.

 

(Additional reporting by Lisa Barrington in Dubai, Nandita Bose in Wahsington, Ali Abdelaty in Cairo, Babak Dehghanpisheh in Geneva; Writing by Stephen Kalin, Ghaida Ghantous and David Lawder; Editing by Raissa Kasolowsky, Mark Potter, Chris Reese and Sandra Maler)

 

reuters_logo.jpg

-- © Copyright Reuters 2019-05-20

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

i pissed myself laughing,  (advice for commercial arlines)  so you are a passenger in a jet liner flying over the Gulf of Oman, pilot looks out the window, missile at 2 o, clock. dive dive,  yep, that will work, lol !!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Inflammatory post reported and removed.

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
20 minutes ago, Tug said:

That’s our Donald tear up a working agreement that was being followed replace it with nothing give the ok to give the Saudis nuclear tec (the ones that did the World Trade Center)yea Donald sounds great ya clown 

I agree with all except the term working. Working in what way? What is working to you?

 

1. working. politically expedient for Obama*, great new businesses for EU partners, huge money for Iran to support both their economy and extend regional military influence. Yes.

 

2. Working: To prevent Iran becoming another nuclear threat and thorn in the West's side. No. Note: Iran was already working on explosive mechanisms for nuclear weapons at least ten years ago. Their angelic claims of 'peacefulness' are just posturing (true of all sides, btw)

 

*Why is the spell checker not spelling Obama, but has no trouble with Osama??

  • Thanks 1
  • Haha 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

A troll post containing a flaming animated meme has been removed. 

  • Haha 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, rabas said:

Baseless bravado. The second time the US threatened to fire missiles into Syria because of the use of Chemical weapons, Mr Putin threatened "Not only will I shoot down your missiles we will also destroy the platforms they were fired from (aircraft, vessels)"

 

Trump: Here they come Mr. Putin and they are very smart. 100+ missiles fired, known targets removed, no evidence of any shot down, no aircraft, vessels fired on.

 

Putin bravado +5

Trump bravado  0

Known targets removed reliant upon US propaganda.  Collateral damage to civilians ratified by independent reporting.

  • Like 2
  • Confused 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...