Jump to content
BANGKOK 18 June 2019 04:39
webfact

U.S. officials seek to tamp down Trump rhetoric on Iran

Recommended Posts

U.S. officials seek to tamp down Trump rhetoric on Iran

By Patricia Zengerle

 

2019-05-21T200624Z_1_LYNXNPEF4K1VZ_RTROPTP_4_USA-IRAN-CONGRESS.JPG

U.S. Acting Defense Secretary Patrick Shanahan arrives to hold a classified briefing on Iran, with Secretary of State Mike Pompeo and Chairman of the Joint Chiefs U.S. Marine Corps General Joseph Dunford, for members of the House of Representatives on Capitol Hill in Washington, U.S. May 21, 2019. REUTERS/Jonathan Ernst

 

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - U.S. officials who briefed Congress about Iran on Tuesday sought to convince lawmakers that President Donald Trump's administration wants to deter Tehran's aggression, not attack the Islamic republic, members of Congress said.

 

"I hope they're tamping down (the rhetoric). They tried to give that impression," Representative Eliot Engel, chairman of the Foreign Affairs Committee, told reporters after the classified briefing for the full House of Representatives.

 

Secretary of State Mike Pompeo, Joint Chiefs of Staff Chairman General Joseph Dunford and Acting Secretary of Defense Patrick Shanahan held the briefing after lawmakers, including Trump's fellow Republicans as well as Democrats, clamoured for weeks for more information about escalating tensions with Iran.

 

The administration officials held a similar briefing, also behind closed doors, for the full Senate later on Tuesday.

 

At the closed-door sessions, they spelled out to lawmakers what they described as the imminent threat from Iran, or its proxies, to U.S. personnel in the Middle East. Several Democrats said they were sceptical about the extent of the threat, but Trump's fellow Republicans generally agreed there was a heightened risk to Americans.

 

"There is no intention to go to war in the region. This is a deterrent operation to stop Iran's escalation and aggression," Representative Mike McCaul, the ranking Republican on the House foreign affairs panel, told reporters.

 

After speaking to lawmakers, Shanahan said the administration does not want the situation to escalate and that its actions to date had deterred attacks by Iran on U.S. forces.

 

"This is about deterrence, not about war. We're not about going to war," Shanahan told reporters.

 

Pompeo, who has been an Iran hawk since he served in the House, made only a general comment that the administration officials had discussed their "strategic campaign" in the briefings.

 

ESCALATING RHETORIC

Tehran and Washington have been escalating rhetoric against each other this month, following Trump's decision to try to cut Iran's oil exports to zero and beef up the U.S. military presence in the Gulf in response to what he said were Iranian threats.

 

Trump said the tightened sanctions were intended to push Iran to make concessions beyond the terms of the 2015 international deal to curb Iran's nuclear programme. Trump withdrew the United States from the pact a year ago.

 

Last week, Washington pulled some diplomatic staff from its embassy in Baghdad following attacks on four oil tankers in the Gulf.

 

Iranian President Hassan Rouhani on Tuesday rejected talks with the United States, after Trump saidIran would call and ask for negotiations "if and when they are ever ready."

 

After the Senate meeting, Republican Senator Lindsey Graham said they had told lawmakers the recent attacks on shipping and a pipeline in the Middle East were directed by the Iranian government and that U.S. officials had detected worrisome communication between Tehran and a Shi'ite militia that prompted the military to quickly relocate an aircraft carrier.

 

"They explained to us how the Iranian threat streams were different than in the past, that the attack on the ships and the pipeline was coordinated and directed by the Iranian government, the ayatollah," Graham told reporters.

 

Some House Democrats accused the administration officials of twisting intelligence to make the case for what they see as an aggressive response to any Iranian actions.

 

"In my opinion, there was not any information there that pointed to any reason why we should be engaging in talk of war with Iran," said Representative Ruben Gallego, a Democratic member of the House Armed Services Committee.

 

Democrats also faulted Trump's administration for, as they put it, lacking a long-term plan to deal with Iran now that Washington has withdrawn from the nuclear agreement.

 

"They're just hoping that in the end the Iranians decide to come to the table, without any clear plan on how that is going to happen," Democratic Senator Chris Murphy, a Foreign Relations Committee member, told reporters.

 

(Additional reporting by David Alexander and Mohammad Zargham; Editing by James Dalgleish)

 

reuters_logo.jpg

-- © Copyright Reuters 2019-05-22
  • Haha 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

This is how it works, Trump makes a lot of noises waring words and veiled threats, while his aids ar 'holding him back and calming him down'

It's all a game, a brinkmanship games that is full of bravado and posies, and the winner/s? while everybody knows how it started, nobody really knows how will it end...

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
31 minutes ago, webfact said:

U.S. officials seek to tamp down Trump rhetoric on Iran

Plain English;  Shut him up!

  • Haha 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Oh no. I need comic relief everyday.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The committee should instead call in the hosts of Fox & Friends and ask them to discuss the dangers of a war with Iran on their show.  Instead of reading his presidential daily briefs, Donald get his briefings on TV during his "executive time."

  • Like 1
  • Haha 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Posted (edited)

Who's gonna smack his fat but when he transgresses? All the grown-ups left the WH long ago and what remains is a perfect real life example of "Lord Of The Flies" with the unfortunate added consequence that the whole world is suffering because of it.

May the McD diet have mercy on us all post haste!

Edited by Becker
  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

My life would improve immeasurably if the media didn't report on and print every asinine tweet that Trump sends out.

For the first month of his presidency I could not wait to get out of bed each morning to read what monstrous idiocy he had tweeted while I was asleep. 

It became boring as all the tweets were lies. 

Then it started to irritate me. 

Now it is making me depressed.

 

  • Thanks 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...