Jump to content

Update: No evidence of dangerous chemicals at port blaze site


rooster59

Recommended Posts

Update: No evidence of dangerous chemicals at port blaze site

By The Nation

 

ec7526d68971202ed519dca69f6d7c07.jpeg

 

Preliminary investigations have not found any toxic chemicals at Laem Chabang Port, which suffered a disruption due to a fire on Saturday morning, the director of Thailand Port Authority, Kamolsak Phromprayoon, said.

 

The KMTC Hong Kong, registered as a South Korean ship, caught fire in the early hours of Saturday at the port in the Sri Racha district of Chon Buri province. It had unloaded more than 400 containers of goods but a fire broke out when 35 containers still remained on board. Some of the containers were scheduled to be delivered to Vietnam and to the port in Samut Prakan province, close to Bangkok. 

 

Locals living in the vicinity were evacuated and at least 25 port workers were injured.

 

Meanwhile, Yutana Phoolpipat, the director of Customs Department Office at Laem Chabang Port in eastern coastal Thailand, said some chemical goods were responsible for the fire. The department, however, said those goods were neither smuggled into the country nor were falsely declared, he said .

 

Officials would inspect the goods in those containers and find out the cause of the fire, he added.

 

Laem Chabang Municipality officials have set up a support centre for affected people who want to file complaints and seek compensation.

 

Source: http://www.nationmultimedia.com/detail/national/30369989

 

thenation_logo.jpg

-- © Copyright The Nation 2019-05-26
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Not quite the same, but I remember an explosion followed by a fire at Bangkok port on the Chao Phraya river nearly thirty years ago.

We lived four kilometres from the port itself on the eleventh floor of a cheap condo. The entire building shook, very frightening. Never found out if any of the resulting smoke/fumes were dangerous.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, rooster59 said:

The department, however, said those goods were neither smuggled into the country nor were falsely declared,

What a strange thing to stress; almost like there is something to hide.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

“said some chemical goods were responsible for the fire. The department, however, said those goods were neither smuggled into the country nor were falsely declared, he said .

 

Officials would inspect the goods in those containers and find out the cause of the fire, he added.”

 

So even before they have inspected the goods they have determined there was no smuggling or false declaration.

 

Nothing like solving a case before you’ve started the investigation, although it seems common in Thailand.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 hours ago, Classic Ray said:

“said some chemical goods were responsible for the fire. The department, however, said those goods were neither smuggled into the country nor were falsely declared, he said .

 

Officials would inspect the goods in those containers and find out the cause of the fire, he added.”

 

So even before they have inspected the goods they have determined there was no smuggling or false declaration.

 

Nothing like solving a case before you’ve started the investigation, although it seems common in Thailand.

Cart before the horse syndrome... deny everything from the start then slowly back track when the truth comes out... seems to be the Thai way!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

and the very next day

 

"Port Authority says shipper did not disclose flammable cargo.

HIGHLY FLAMMABLE toxic chemicals that were not declared were found inside the burnt cargo at Laem Chabang Seaport in Chon Buri province, the Thailand Port Authority disclosed.

"

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.




×
×
  • Create New...