Jump to content
BANGKOK 17 June 2019 13:57

Iran has accelerated enrichment of uranium, IAEA says

Recommended Posts

Iran has accelerated enrichment of uranium, IAEA says
By Sabine Siebold and Francois Murphy



International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) Director General Yukiya Amano addresses a news conference during a board of governors meeting at the IAEA headquarters in Vienna, Austria March 4, 2019. REUTERS/Leonhard Foeger


TEHRAN/VIENNA (Reuters) - Iran has followed through on a threat to accelerate its production of enriched uranium, the head of the U.N. atomic watchdog said on Monday, departing from his usual guarded language to say he was worried about increasing tension.


The assessment comes at a time of sharply increased U.S.-Iranian confrontation in recent weeks, a year after Washington abandoned an agreement between Iran and world powers to curb Tehran's nuclear programme in exchange for the lifting of international financial sanctions.


Washington tightened sanctions from the start of May, ordering all countries and companies to halt all imports of Iranian oil or be banished from the global financial system. It has also dispatched extra troops to the region to counter what it describes as Iranian threats.


Iran has responded with a threat to increase its enrichment of uranium, saying it is up to Europeans who still support the nuclear deal to save it by finding ways to ensure Tehran gets the economic benefits it was promised.


IAEA chief Yukiya Amano, whose agency is responsible for monitoring Iranian compliance with the nuclear deal, said Iran was now producing more enriched uranium than before, but it was not clear when it might reach stockpile limits set in the pact.


"Yes, (the) production rate is increasing," he told a news conference when asked if enriched uranium production had accelerated since the agency's last quarterly report, which found Iran compliant with the nuclear deal as of May 20. He declined to quantify the increase.


Iran said last month it was still abiding by the deal but would quadruple its production of enriched uranium - a move that could take it out of compliance if stockpiles rise too far. It demanded European countries do more to shield it from sanctions.


On Monday, German Foreign Minister Heiko Maas became the most senior Western official to visit Iran since the new war of words erupted last month between Washington and Tehran.


"The situation in the region here is highly explosive and extremely serious," Maas told a news conference alongside Iran's foreign minister, Mohammad Javad Zarif. "A dangerous escalation of existing tensions can also lead to a military escalation."


In his meeting with Maas, President Hassan Rouhani blamed the United States for the soaring tension and called on the European signatories of the deal to "resist the economic war on Iran imposed by America".


"This war ... will never be beneficial for any country and the Iranian people will resist these pressures and bullying behaviours," Iran's state TV quoted Rouhani as saying.


Zarif said Iran would cooperate with the European Union to save the deal. "Reducing tension is only possible through stopping the economic war by America," he said. "Those who wage such wars cannot expect to remain safe."


Maas called on Iran to avoid an escalation and stick to its commitments from the nuclear deal. Otherwise, Tehran would risk further isolation on the international stage and more instability in the region, Maas warned in an interview with ZDF television, broadcast shortly after his return to Berlin on Monday evening.



Amano said he was worried about increasing tensions over the nuclear issue. He added he hoped "that ways can be found to reduce the current tensions through dialogue. It is essential that Iran fully implements its nuclear-related commitments" under the deal.


In Washington, State Department spokeswoman Morgan Ortagus said the IAEA findings showed "that Iran is going in the wrong direction and it underscores the continuing challenge Iran poses to international peace and security."


Washington's European allies opposed its decision last year to abandon the nuclear deal, reached in 2015 between Iran and the United States, Germany, France, Britain, Russia and China. They have promised to help Iran find other ways to trade, although with no success so far. All major European companies that had announced plans to invest in Iran have since called them off for fear of U.S. punishment.


Iran says the Europeans have not done enough to provide it with alternative ways to trade.


"We have not seen any serious measures taken by the Europeans in the past year despite their fairly good political stance," Rouhani said.


Maas said there were limits to how much help the European countries could provide.


"We want to fulfil our obligations," Maas said during his news conference with Zarif. "We cannot work miracles, but we will try to avert a failure" of the nuclear deal.


France, Britain and Germany have set up a special-purpose vehicle called Instex, designed to allow payments to Iran that would legally bypass sanctions. It has yet to be launched.


It is a new instrument and not straightforward to put into effect, Maas told reporters, adding: "But all the formal requirements are in place now, and so I'm assuming we'll be ready to use it in the foreseeable future."


Washington has denounced the European plans. Diplomats say the system is unlikely to have much impact on commercial business with Iran but could be used for humanitarian transactions that are permitted under U.S. sanctions.


The State Department's Ortagus said the United States would not support any payment mechanism that allowed countries or businesses to conduct transactions with sanctioned Iranian entities.


Washington says the nuclear deal should be expanded to cover other issues including Iran's missile programme and its role in wars in the region.


European countries argue that while they share those concerns, it would be harder to address them without the nuclear deal in place.


Iran has ruled out any negotiation over its ballistic missile programme and its activities in the Middle East, where Tehran has been involved in proxy wars with Saudi Arabia for decades.


(Additional reporting by Tuqa Khalid in Dubai and Michael Nienaber in Berlin; Writing by Parisa Hafezi in Dubai and Lesley Wroughton in Washington.; Editing by Peter Graff, Frances Kerry and Peter Cooney)



-- © Copyright Reuters 2019-06-11

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, Pedrogaz said:

How on earth do you know....are you past of the IAEA? Have you undertaken inspections? Now who to believe, the experts at the IAEA or someone expressing a silly opinion on TV?

As I pointed out above, even Israeli intelligence says Iran has been abiding by the agreement.

  • Like 2

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites

What has happened since the US reneged (yet again) on their agreement (at the behest of Netanyahu, who somehow seems to run US foreign policy), is that the slimy EU has failed to keep its end of the bargain. The US is ordering them around, you must buy this for America or else, you must not deal with Iran etc etc.

Anyone with a whit of self-respect would tell the US to sling their hook...but the spineless leadership of the spineless EU falls in line but expects Iran to continue to abide by the terms of the agreement.

  • Like 1
  • Haha 1

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites

Goliath strode forth in battle splendor, rattling saber and banging shield, screaming his war challenge across the plain, but from the serried ranks of his cowering enemies, one man stepped forward, sling in hand, intently searching the ground around, with hooded eyes.


David calmly bent and retrieved a stone. Not any stone, but a perfectly rounded orb of hardest quartz. Straightening slowly he seated it securely in the worn leather saddle of his sling and started spinning it above his head

  • Like 1

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites

Try to honestly answer this question: why wouldn't Iran attempt to enrich uranium? 


You have an extremely devious force in the world who now has a growing history of toppling regimes for their own economic gain. What other weapon do they have to fight against such an invasion? 


I think Iran would be incompetent not to pursue nuclear weapons given the US penchant for going out of their way to topple regimes for their own gain. 


There is also that little inconvenient fact that the US has nuclear weapons, and tells other nations not to develop them. 

  • Like 2

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

  • Create New...