Jump to content

A bloody Ramadan in the deep South


webfact

Recommended Posts

A bloody Ramadan in the deep South 

By Sunai Phasuk 
Special to The Nation

 

opinion1.jpg

 

When Barisan Revolusi Nasional (BRN) insurgents detonated a motorcycle bomb at the crowded Bor Thong Market in Pattani province on May 27, they could have foreseen there would be many civilian casualties. But that did not stop them. 

 

The bomb, apparently meant to attack Thai security forces guarding the market, killed two civilians, including a 14-year-old boy, and wounded 18 others.

 

Most of the victims were ethnic Malay Muslims buying food to break their Ramadan fast. 

 

Indiscriminate bombings and targeted killings of civilians have been a BRN trademark since they began their armed insurgency in January 2004. 

 

The military stepped up security for the Muslim holiday of Ramadan in the three southern border provinces, but this did not appear to make an appreciable impact on insurgent activity. Human Rights Watch documented 21 attacks between May 6 and June 5, including bomb attacks and shootings that killed and wounded Thai Buddhists and Malay Muslims in Songkhla, Pattani, Yala and Narathiwat provinces. The BRN also targeted ethnic Malay Muslims it accused of being traitors for working with Thai authorities or supporting a peace dialogue with the government. 

 

BRN insurgents, guided by a combination of militant Malay nationalism and Islamist ideologies, seek to liberate Patani Darulsalam (the Islamic Land of Patani) from what they contend is a Thai Buddhist occupation. Their violent campaign aims to drive out ethnic Thai Buddhists, discredit Thai authorities, and control the ethnic Malay Muslim population. 

 

The BRN has repeatedly used tactics that are not only unlawful under international law, but are abhorrent and unjustifiable. 

 

The laws of war, applicable in southern Thailand, prohibit attacks that do not discriminate between military targets and civilians, as well as other common BRN tactics such as the killing of civilians and captured combatants, mutilation or other mistreatment of the dead, and attacks directed at schools and hospitals.

 

Thai security forces have also committed serious abuses. Their extrajudicial killings, enforced disappearances, and torture of suspected insurgents are reinforced by the government’s failure to prosecute any security personnel responsible. 

 

The BRN should cease deliberate and indiscriminate attacks on civilians. And the Thai government should fully prosecute abusive security personnel, regardless of rank. Only then will civilians in Thailand’s deep South escape the violence that has marked this Ramadan with bullets and bombs.

 

Sunai Phasuk is senior researcher in the Asia Division of Human Rights Watch.

 

Source: http://www.nationmultimedia.com/detail/opinion/30370940

 

thenation_logo.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

A gutless  bunch of cowards, that do not understand that

all their killings are for nought , change can only happen by 

communication  and dialogue and by having the will of those people who live in the claimed disputed areas. Bashing down doors with violence never wins, collectively it is seen as abhorrent by main stream muslims and Buddhists alike.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, RichardColeman said:

Just muslims doing what muslims do these days throughout the world

And they are the TRUE reason (besides affordable pussy) why I left Paris/France to relocate to Pattaya/Thailand almost 10 years ago.

I saw it coming. All the suburban areas within a 5 to 10 kilometers radius of Paris and major cities through France are massive rampant Islamic ghettos.

With a birthrate of 5:1 in favor of arabs/muslims in France against true farangs, things are only going to get worse and worse.

Trump was right, France and Europe/Western countries are slowly turning into sh!tholistans.

"Thanks" to the leftists.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, wgdanson said:

Religionist

Got a good laugh outta me... but is religionist even a word in this context?

 

Here is what I found

 

Noun. 1. religionist - a person addicted to religion or a religious zealot. religious person - a person who manifests devotion to a deity.

 

https://www.google.ca/search?source=hp&ei=128AXZ3JM8z1vgTM7rK4Ag&q=religionist&oq=religionist&gs_l=psy-ab.12..0l10.1438.3628..5090...0.0..0.115.1014.9j2......0....1..gws-wiz.....0..0i131j0i10.6i3MQoN1H0g

 

So... let's try to find the "mot juste" cause I dunno what it is...

 

 

https://english.stackexchange.com/questions/151928/is-there-a-word-for-hate-against-religions-or-a-specific-religion

Is there a word for hate against religions or a specific religion? [duplicate]

"We have racism, which implies hate against one or more races.

We have sexism, which implies hate against one of the sexes.

We have nationalism, which implies hate against one or more nationalities.

Is there such a single word for hate against one or more religions?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, tcp7 said:

With a birthrate of 5:1 in favor of arabs/muslims in France against true farangs, things are only going to get worse and worse.

Trump was right, France and Europe/Western countries are slowly turning into sh!tholistans.

"Thanks" to the leftists.

 

Est-ce que le nom le plus populaire est Mohamed tel en Angleterre?

 

Sorry for the Francais... is the name Mohamed the most popular name in France yet as it is in England?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, wgdanson said:

I agree with what you mean, but Muslim is not a race, it is a religion, so it is Religionist.

 Muslims are people who follow or practice Islam, their belief is not a religion it is an Ideology. An ideology is a collection of normative beliefs and values that an individual or group holds for other than purely epistemic reasons.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, webfact said:

The BRN should cease deliberate and indiscriminate attacks on civilians. And the Thai government should fully prosecute abusive security personnel, regardless of rank.

Neither is the cause of the insurgency, so neither will solve the conflict that is basically an issue of sovereignty since the 1700's between the Muslims in the now southern Thailand provinces. 

7 hours ago, webfact said:

The BRN has repeatedly used tactics that are not only unlawful under international law

Yet, the Thai military and specifically Prayut have refused international recognition of the Muslim insurgency in southern Thailand and refused any international facilitators in peace negotiations. 

It begs credibility to cite 'international law' violations when a government often rejects international law as a policy.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 hours ago, LazySlipper said:

 

That's racist...

 

But true...☠️

Not racist, though Muslims tend to act as though any criticism of their actions or medieval ideology should be treated as such.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.




×
×
  • Create New...